Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Perforce Acana comparison

Kong and Perforce are both solutions in the API Management category. Kong is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Perforce is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Kong holds a 7.2% mindshare in APIM, compared to Perforce’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Kong users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Read 25 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews

7,416 Views
7,416 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Perforce Acana

Read 3 Perforce Acana reviews

701 Views
701 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Perforce Acana

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 8, 2025

Perforce Acana and Kong Gateway Enterprise are competitors in the API management sector. Kong Gateway Enterprise has a leading position due to its comprehensive features and perceived investment value.

Features: Perforce Acana provides robust version control capabilities, integration flexibility, and scalability, making it suitable for large enterprises. Kong Gateway Enterprise stands out with its microservices architecture, advanced traffic management, and enhanced security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perforce Acana offers straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support, enabling quick setup and responsive assistance. Kong Gateway Enterprise provides container support and Kubernetes integrations for deployment, although its customer service response could be improved.

Pricing and ROI: Perforce Acana comes with a competitive pricing structure that offers strong ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Kong Gateway Enterprise requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant long-term ROI due to its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Perforce Acana Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Perforce Acana

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Perforce Acana

Ranking in API Management

30th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 7.2%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce Acana is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ASHOK YADAV

Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions but lacks software upgrades

Upgrading Kong Gateway Enterprise should be more sophisticated and innovative. The main issue is with the update process. Our DevOps and admin teams need to update multiple files, which is cumbersome. For instance, in cases where Palantir countries are involved, they have to update many files, which is not ideal. However, for other tasks like configuring the message routing and services and handling all the configurations, the process is acceptable. The software version upgrade process should be improved. Additionally, the DevOps portal should be integrated more natively. There are a few other areas for improvement, such as implementing automatic load balancing. The status of the office team, whether it is up or down, should be checked at the API gateway level to facilitate load balancing.

Read full review

Saurav Krishna

Data Engineering and AI Intern at .3Lines Venture Capital

Authentication mechanism is easy to implement but improvement is needed in documentation

For API security purposes, we use the tool to host all our APIs. This allows us to take advantage of the security features provided by the platform. With the solution, we can implement rules such as rate limiting and restricting the number of API calls for each user. It acts as a secure gateway…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Kong Enterprise are the out-of-the-box open source easy functionality."

"It boasts remarkable speed and stability, and these qualities, particularly the gateway's resilience, are standout features for me."

"There are a few features that I like about Kong when it comes to authentication and authorization. Specifically, being able to use Kong for role-based access control (RBAC), and then further being able to integrate the RBAC mechanism with our enterprise directory, was very useful."

"The features I like include ease of operation and implementation in a cloud environment, the dashboarding features for API statistics, and the user-friendly developer portal."

"Kong enterprise has significantly enhanced our ability to manage and secure our Microservices. Its most valuable feature is monitoring."

"We use the solution for load-balancing, caching, and rate-limiting APIs."

"Kong Gateway helped to improve performance. It's good enough for our users."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it seamlessly supports a vast number of tools."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros

"Good interface, intuitive solution."

"It allowed us to publish and replace pre-essential transactions in one place, with a uniformity in terms of control and policies."

"The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters."

Cons

"From an improvement perspective, the product should offer more readily available connectors and also allow for more seamless AI integrations."

"The solution should include policy features that are available in other solutions like MuleSoft API manager but missing in Kong Enterprise."

"The OS upgrades are not as frequent as they should be and they are bulky."

"Kong is meant for north-south communications, so it will be interesting to see what solutions they can come up with in the realms of east-west communications, service-to-service communications, and Zero Trust architecture. I believe that if they can provide for these areas, then they will be able to solve the overall integration and security concerns for microservices architecture in general."

"The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful."

"Kong Enterprise needs to improve its pricing, which starts at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Pricing should be based on API usage rather than monthly. It should improve its documentation as well."

"They could focus more on pricing."

"Because it is open-source, it should be less expensive than others."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons

"The product has new features that we are going to implement in the next few months, such as API management and analytic reporting."

"Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation."

"Lacks an integrated billing feature."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is really reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."

"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."

"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."

"Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."

"The product is reasonably priced because it goes by the SaaS model."

"The licensing fees are paid yearly."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice

"For us, the pricing and licensing policies were for an on-premise installation with a fixed cost structure, that matched our budgeting policies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kong Enterprise?

The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?

More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Akana API Management?

The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akana API Management?

Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akana API Management?

I rate Akana API Management an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors

Apigee vs Perforce Acana

Compared 37% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Perforce Acana

Compared 18% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Perforce Acana

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Perforce Acana

Compared 13% of the time

More Perforce Acana Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise

July 2025

Download Kong Gateway Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download Perforce Acana product report

Overview

Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

Kong

Perforce Acana optimizes workflows with robust functionality designed for efficient file versioning and collaboration. It offers reliable features suitable for organizations requiring performance and scalability.

Leveraging powerful version control, Perforce Acana enables teams to manage large codebases and complex projects with ease. Its distributed architecture supports concurrent editing, ensuring developers collaborate effectively without workflow interruptions. Integration with popular development tools streamlines operations, making it a preferred choice for high-demand environments needing adaptability alongside stringent compliance standards.

What are Perforce Acana's key features?

Version Control: Offers advanced capabilities for managing large-scale projects with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansive teams and growing codebases efficiently.
Integration: Syncs seamlessly with numerous development tools and platforms.
Concurrent Editing: Facilitates simultaneous collaboration among developers.

Which benefits should users consider from reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined operations that improve team efficiency.
Reduced Downtime: Reliable architecture minimizing workflow disruptions.
Cost-Effectiveness: Long-term savings through improved resource management.
Scalability: Growing projects accommodated without sacrificing performance.

Perforce Acana is widely adopted in industries such as gaming and finance, where robust version control and collaborative capabilities are essential. It ensures large teams operate seamlessly, supporting intense development cycles while adhering to industry-specific regulations.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner

British American Tobacco, Credit Suisse, Daimler, eBay, FOX, Liberty Mutual, Marriott, Mayo Clinic, Skandia, Tata communications

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Perforce Acana

July 2025

Free Report: Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Perforce Acana

Find out what your peers are saying about Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Perforce Acana and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Perforce Acana report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.