Microsoft Azure API Management vs Perforce Acana comparison

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Perforce Acana

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Perforce Acana

Ranking in API Management

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 17.9%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce Acana is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian

Specialist PCC at Danfoss

Efficiently manages and monetizes API

It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.

Read full review

Saurav Krishna

Data Engineering and AI Intern at .3Lines Venture Capital

Authentication mechanism is easy to implement but improvement is needed in documentation

For API security purposes, we use the tool to host all our APIs. This allows us to take advantage of the security features provided by the platform. With the solution, we can implement rules such as rate limiting and restricting the number of API calls for each user. It acts as a secure gateway…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are its importing and publishing."

"The Azure Active Directory Synchronization is quite good."

"Microsoft Azure API Management is better because it has a DevOps integration by default."

"There were no scalability issues."

"The integration and API Connect are valuable when we need to connect with web services and REST APIs."

"The simplicity to learn and apply using API Management is valuable."

"Azure API is scalable."

"The solution has overall high performance."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"Good interface, intuitive solution."

"The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters."

"It allowed us to publish and replace pre-essential transactions in one place, with a uniformity in terms of control and policies."

Cons

"When you start with Azure API management, you also need to onboard the Azure console and the Azure cloud environment, which comes with a price."

"It would be better if it were easier to transition to Azure from JIRA. For example, different nomenclature must be performed when you shift to Azure from JIRA. JIRA's storage, tasks, and ethics are treated differently from Azure. Here they might become functions, which is not an option in JIRA because that nomenclature difference is there. If someone has to get into the nomenclature, then there can be different tasks from clients, and here, they may be treated as functions. JIRA has sub-tasks, but sub-tasks don't exist in Azure. The nomenclature and the linking between ethics and a function and a story are different, and people may have to learn to adapt to the new nomenclature."

"The licensing part of Microsoft is always higher than other platforms, like Amazon services and other cloud services. Microsoft should work on reducing the cost."

"The solution's deployment process could be slightly improved in terms of time. Additionally, they should enhance AI capabilities and more advanced integration features with other platforms."

"Sometimes when immediate support is required, it isn't available."

"Latency is an area that needs improvement, especially for multi-tenant applications."

"Microsoft Azure API Management could be improved by enhancing the preview feature, specifically the workspaces."

"The licensing tiers can be misleading."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation."

"Lacks an integrated billing feature."

"The product has new features that we are going to implement in the next few months, such as API management and analytic reporting."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an expensive solution"

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS. There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time."

"The licensing fees are expensive."

"The price is comparable."

"Microsoft is competitively priced."

"There are no additional costs above the main license."

"Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"For us, the pricing and licensing policies were for an on-premise installation with a fixed cost structure, that matched our budgeting policies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

What do you like most about Akana API Management?

The tool's authentication mechanism is easy to implement. We had to define a few parameters.

What needs improvement with Akana API Management?

Akana API Management needs to improve its documentation.

What advice do you have for others considering Akana API Management?

I rate Akana API Management an eight out of ten.

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Comparisons

Compared 45% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 20% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Apigee vs Perforce Acana

Compared 39% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Perforce Acana

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Perforce Acana

Compared 15% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Perforce Acana

Compared 12% of the time

More Perforce Acana Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure API Management

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

API Management

Download Perforce Acana product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

Perforce Acana optimizes workflows with robust functionality designed for efficient file versioning and collaboration. It offers reliable features suitable for organizations requiring performance and scalability.

Leveraging powerful version control, Perforce Acana enables teams to manage large codebases and complex projects with ease. Its distributed architecture supports concurrent editing, ensuring developers collaborate effectively without workflow interruptions. Integration with popular development tools streamlines operations, making it a preferred choice for high-demand environments needing adaptability alongside stringent compliance standards.

What are Perforce Acana's key features?

Version Control: Offers advanced capabilities for managing large-scale projects with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansive teams and growing codebases efficiently.
Integration: Syncs seamlessly with numerous development tools and platforms.
Concurrent Editing: Facilitates simultaneous collaboration among developers.

Which benefits should users consider from reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined operations that improve team efficiency.
Reduced Downtime: Reliable architecture minimizing workflow disruptions.
Cost-Effectiveness: Long-term savings through improved resource management.
Scalability: Growing projects accommodated without sacrificing performance.

Perforce Acana is widely adopted in industries such as gaming and finance, where robust version control and collaborative capabilities are essential. It ensures large teams operate seamlessly, supporting intense development cycles while adhering to industry-specific regulations.

Perforce

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

British American Tobacco, Credit Suisse, Daimler, eBay, FOX, Liberty Mutual, Marriott, Mayo Clinic, Skandia, Tata communications

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Perforce Acana