Kiteworks vs Thru comparison

Kiteworks and Thru are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Kiteworks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Thru is ranked #18. Kiteworks holds a 5.2% mindshare in MFT, compared to Thru’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thru users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

3,788 Views
2,046 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Thru

Read 1 Thru review

652 Views
619 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Thru

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kiteworks and Thru based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).

To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 891,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (17th), Email Security (26th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

Thru

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 5.2%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thru is 1.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kiteworks	5.2%
Thru	1.7%
Other	93.1%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

reviewer1090674

Business Analyst at a media company with 1-10 employees

Scalable, reliable, and excellent support

I have been using Thru for approximately two years The stability of Thru is very good. Thru is a scalable solution. We have approximately 50 people using this solution. The technical support from Thru is great. I rate the support of Thru a five out of five. Positive The initial setup of Thru…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"The most useful feature of this solution is to share files with external parties and we can use this functionality to share files internally too."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"The solution can be used remotely, including from mobiles, and it's easy to upload and share files."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

More Kiteworks pros

"The stability of Thru is very good."

"The technical support from Thru is great."

Cons

"We mainly had stability issues with kiteworks, where we were pushing the limits of its capability."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"The system is extremely stable, but because it is a "COTS" system access is restricted and you must use the solution's support to make even simple changes, which increases the downtime."

"File location could be improved."

"There is one particular thing that is a nuisance."

"File location could be improved."

More Kiteworks cons

"The initial setup of Thru needed an engineer to be involved."

"We purchased the basic solution, only to realize that there is an add-on model that would allow us to manage workflows automatically. However, it was very expensive, so we did not use it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"Overall, the price of the solution is good for what it does, but when you want to add some features it can get expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

891,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

GoAnywhere MFT vs Thru

Compared 27% of the time

Files.com vs Thru

Compared 17% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs Thru

Compared 15% of the time

MetaDefender Managed File Transfer (MFT) vs Thru

Compared 14% of the time

Aspera On Demand vs Thru

Compared 11% of the time

More Thru Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

April 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

March 2026

Download Thru product report

Also Known As

Accellion

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Kiteworks

Thru

Overview

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Kiteworks

Thru offers a comprehensive file transfer solution tailored for enterprises, enabling secure and efficient data exchange across platforms while ensuring compliance with various data management requirements.

Thru serves businesses by facilitating seamless, secure integration between multiple systems, streamlining data transfer processes, and supporting collaboration. With tools that enhance data security and management, it caters to diverse industry-specific needs, ensuring robust performance and reliability.

What are the valuable features of Thru?

Secure File Transfer: Provides encrypted pathways for safe data transit between entities.
Multi-Platform Integration: Ensures compatibility and operational unity among different systems.
Audit and Reporting: Offers comprehensive logs and reports for data transfer monitoring.
Compliance Support: Aligns with industry standards for data protection and governance.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces the time and resources needed for data exchanges.
Enhanced Security: Minimizes the risk of data breaches with strong security protocols.
Operational Reliability: Ensures consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Scalability: Adapts to changing business needs without major upgrades.

Implementations of Thru in industries such as healthcare, finance, and logistics reflect its adaptability to high-stakes environments requiring compliance and data integrity. In healthcare, Thru enhances patient data exchange security. Logistics benefit from streamlined shipment data management, while finance uses its encryption features to safeguard sensitive transactions.

Thru

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Dell EMC, Plus 500, Manhattan Associates, NetworkRail, Blackbaud, AB InBev, Blackwoods, Sage, Crocs

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

891,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.