Kentik vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM comparison

Kentik and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Kentik is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #85. Kentik holds a 1.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kentik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Kentik

Read 16 Kentik reviews

5,920 Views
5,269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Read 3 NETSCOUT vSTREAM reviews

1,303 Views
1,251 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kentik

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kentik and NETSCOUT vSTREAM compete in the network monitoring domain. Kentik often appeals with its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while NETSCOUT vSTREAM stands out with robust, in-depth features.

Features: Kentik provides comprehensive network visibility, effective analytics, and cloud integration. NETSCOUT vSTREAM offers deep packet inspection, detailed traffic analysis, and is effective in high-performance scenarios.

Room for Improvement: Kentik could enhance detailed traffic analytics, refine high-performance support, and expand extensibility. NETSCOUT vSTREAM may improve on cost-effectiveness, ease of integration, and quicker setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kentik's deployment is swift with extensive support, fitting agile environments. NETSCOUT vSTREAM requires more complex deployment but benefits from strong technical support, fitting larger infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Kentik's lower entry cost with flexible pricing boosts its ROI quickly. NETSCOUT vSTREAM, although pricier, delivers value through its extensive features, with ROI realized over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Kentik vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kentik

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

22nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (16th)

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

85th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kentik is 1.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT vSTREAM is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kentik	1.9%
NETSCOUT vSTREAM	0.4%
Other	97.7%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Shubham-Saxena

Network Engineer III at Fortanix

Integrating synthetic tests and network monitoring enhances traffic pattern visualization

The Kentik support team is good. If you want me to rate them on a scale, I would give them eight. I had a call with the Kentik support team for fifteen minutes, so I'm going to give them eight for now. The reason for giving them an eight is that they are good and address our issues. They have monthly calls and discuss the product roadmap with us, including what is needed and what is not. However, when we are working on some real issues with Kentik, I sometimes feel there's a delay due to the busyness of their teams. We faced some outages and were not able to get the desired results from Kentik tools, so that took a little time to resolve.

Read full review

Keval Lodaya

Network Engineer at Inniti Network Solution

A user-friendly solution that is easy to install and improves visibility

I would like to see improvements made to the user guide. From my personal experience, it is helpful to see a list of steps describing what to do next in different situations. An example is what to do and what to back up in the case of certain types of failure. There are also cases where a customer can't understand specific features. Enhancements to the user guide would be helpful for this. More features for network fragmentation would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers a simple yet powerful feature of classifying applications, going beyond basic statistics."

"Before using the solution, we had to do all these manual tasks, such as running all these queries manually, and building our tech cost-report used to be a two or two-and-a-half-week effort, and using Kentik, and the automation that it provides us, we've brought that down to a day or two, which is a massive time savings."

"The drill-down into detailed views of network activity helps to quickly pinpoint locations and causes. All the information is there."

"The most valuable feature is being able to pull traffic patterns; to and from destinations. We're able to understand where our traffic is going, our top talkers from an AS set, as well as where our traffic's coming from."

"Technical support is second to none."

"Monitoring operational efficiency is easy."

"Kentik answers the flow question: what are my flows, where are they are going, and what can I do to better optimize my connectivity."

"We're pretty happy with the API functionality. It's web, and it's very simple to set up queries. It has served us well and you don't need to be an expert on the API or the product to set these things up."

More Kentik pros

"Sometimes it took a month to troubleshoot something that we can now do within days."

"One of the valuable features is the packet decoding."

"The generation of KPI-like information that feeds to the nGeniusONE (management) server is the most valuable feature."

"vSTREAM gives us better visibility and reporting about our network infrastructure, allowing for cost-optimization."

Cons

"We faced some outages and were not able to get the desired results from Kentik tools, so that took a little time to resolve."

"The only downside to Kentik, something that I don't like, is that it's great that it shows you where these anomalies lie, but it's not actionable."

"Sometimes it's difficult to order the dimensions correctly when trying to make Sankey flow diagrams."

"I would like to see more granular user and security rights."

"I believe they're already working on this, but I would love for them to create better integrations from network flow data to application performance — tracing — so that we could overlay that data more readily."

"I've checked out the V4 version of the interface and it's still a little bit clunky for me to use."

"The only downside to Kentik, something that I don't like, is that it's great that it shows you where these anomalies lie, but it's not actionable. Kentik is valuable, don't get me wrong, but if it had an actionable piece to it..."

"I've checked out the V4 version of the interface and it's still a little bit clunky for me to use. I still go back to the old interface. That's definitely one that they still need to work on. It doesn't seem like everything that you get in the V3, the older interface, is there. For instance, I was trying to add a user or do the administrative tasks in V4, and I couldn't figure out where I was supposed to do that."

More Kentik cons

"The stability is okay, but sometimes we see that the memory on the server is not 100 percent correct and we need to stop and start the software to have it reallocated again."

"I would like to see improvements made to the user guide."

"I would like for it to have a smaller footprint of the virtual appliance and better performance."

"I would say that this is not a scalable solution."

"Room for improvement exists in filtering in the packet decode."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"Licensing is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

I would say Kentik's pricing is not cheap. From my perspective as part of the technical team, I would not categorize it as expensive, but I know it is not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kentik?

There's always room for improvements and better relations when using any kind of product. We faced some issues with Kentik UI and alerting, which we asked them to fix, and they succeeded. They have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

We are using Kentik mostly for synthetic tests, and from one last year, network monitoring as well. We are using it for inter DC BGP tests and server monitoring as well.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs Kentik

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 20% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 14% of the time

Arista Data ANalyZer vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 12% of the time

NetMon vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 10% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 9% of the time

More NETSCOUT vSTREAM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kentik

May 2026

Download Kentik product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download NETSCOUT vSTREAM product report

Also Known As

No data available

vSTREAM

Overview

Kentik provides real-time visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on monitoring, data visualization, and flow analysis to manage traffic patterns efficiently.

With robust analytics capabilities, Kentik offers insights into BGP peering status, aids in DDoS detection, and allows for detailed telemetry through its intuitive interface. The platform's SaaS nature simplifies operations by eliminating server maintenance concerns. Multi-vendor support and synthetic testing enhance network security and performance by simulating customer scenarios, while its API offers automation for querying and reporting tasks.

What are the key features of Kentik?

Real-Time Visibility: Monitors network infrastructure effectively.
Data Visualization: Offers powerful tools for viewing complex data.
Flow Analysis: Analyzes traffic flow for optimal management.
BGP Peering Insights: Provides in-depth peering status checks.
DDoS Alerting: Notifies about potential DDoS threats.
Data Explorer: Aids in understanding traffic patterns.
Synthetic Testing: Simulates scenarios to enhance security and performance.

What benefits can be found in user reviews?

Automation: Users value the flexibility of its API for automating tasks.
Ease of Use: SaaS model streamlines user engagement, eliminating server maintenance.
Flexibility: Report customization and query settings are highly appreciated.
Enhanced Observability: Telemetry and multi-vendor support increase oversight.

Industries implement Kentik for network monitoring, traffic management, and flow data analysis across both on-prem and cloud setups. It proves valuable for detecting DDoS events, managing peering relationships, and optimizing costs, besides managing CDN configurations and performing synthetic tests in diverse environments.

Kentik

NETSCOUT vSTREAM provides advanced network visibility and troubleshooting capabilities, making it essential for digital enterprises seeking enhanced operational efficiency and robust service assurance.

Designed to capture and analyze network traffic efficiently, NETSCOUT vSTREAM offers deep packet-level intelligence and real-time analytics, enabling organizations to maintain a comprehensive view of their digital environment. Its powerful features support a range of use cases, from ensuring optimal application performance to safeguarding network health and integrity.

What are the key features of NETSCOUT vSTREAM?

Packet-level Analysis: Delivers granular visibility into network transactions.
Real-time Analytics: Provides instant insights for quick troubleshooting.
Scalable Architecture: Supports large-scale data traffic and complex network structures.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing network infrastructures for enhanced monitoring.
Multi-cloud Support: Extends capabilities across diverse cloud environments.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Minimizes service interruptions with proactive monitoring.
Enhanced Performance: Improves application reliability and user satisfaction.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by optimizing network resources.
Improved Security: Strengthens enterprise defense with detailed traffic analysis.

In finance, NETSCOUT vSTREAM is utilized for performance monitoring to manage high-frequency trading activities efficiently. Healthcare organizations leverage its features to ensure secure data transmission and reliable patient care systems. Retailers apply it to enhance online shopping experiences while maintaining transaction security. Industries adopting this tool see a marked improvement in operational insights and risk management.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.

Metropolitan Police Agency, Banpara, PropertyRoom.com

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

April 2026

Free Report: Kentik vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Find out what your peers are saying about Kentik vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kentik vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.