ManageEngine OpManager and Kentik are key competitors in the network monitoring and traffic analysis sector. ManageEngine OpManager appears to have an edge with its balanced pricing strategy and rapid ROI, while Kentik offers superior real-time traffic visibility fueled by its robust data exploration capabilities.
Features: ManageEngine OpManager provides robust alerting and monitoring with server and CPU alerts, NetFlow analytics, and risk assessment. Its deployment is straightforward, and it simplifies network monitoring and environmental management. Kentik focuses on flow data analysis and network traffic insights with advanced NetFlow visualization, emphasizing real-time visibility and traffic engineering with extensive data exploration options.
Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could improve its licensing model, reduce configuration complexity, and enhance speed. Users note a need for better backup tools, intuitive setup, and customized dashboards and reporting. Kentik could enhance API usability, cost analysis features, and create better actionable insights for anomaly detection. There is also room for growth in application performance integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager is typically deployed on-premises, offering easy use, though improvements in technical support clarity are needed. The customer support is reliable but requires better-trained support teams. Kentik is available on-premises and in the private cloud. It receives positive feedback on support clarity, yet room exists for clarity improvements in service processes and enhanced local service availability.
Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is recognized for competitive pricing compared to SolarWinds and PRTG, although some view it as costly. Its tiered licensing offers an economical solution with swift ROI due to reduced administration. Kentik's pricing strategy aligns with device and flow analysis needs, potentially resulting in significant costs. The pricing is high but justified by its features, with possible educational discounts and budget negotiations.
In production environments, especially for service providers on IP networks and data centers, Kentik helps in reducing the time to identify and resolve issues.
However, from a sales perspective, it's very challenging for the initial sale, and even renewals are tough when it comes to the price point.
I have mostly used forums for any support needed because the setup is straightforward and the documentation is quite good.
They have monthly calls and discuss the product roadmap with us to determine what is needed.
I would give nine points out of ten for ManageEngine OpManager's technical support.
The rating for support would be six out of ten for ManageEngine OpManager.
More support is needed, especially on weekends.
Kentik's integration with Kubernetes makes scaling easier.
You can scale as many devices and tests as you want, but you should have a good number of credits in your accounts.
Scalability is needed more in automation and AI functionalities.
Based on stability, I would give Kentik a nine.
In production, however, dimensioning of the underlying platforms is something to be mindful of.
More work is required to integrate AI for troubleshooting, simplifying root cause analysis, and providing suggested solutions for network issues.
If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure.
There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality.
Improving the after-sales support and learning materials for local engineers and partners to enhance their capacities and expertise.
Kentik’s pricing is competitive in the marketplace.
The pricing is good and aligns with the market target.
The cost is quite high-end for ManageEngine OpManager, especially in our very price-sensitive market here in Sri Lanka.
Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager is good and negotiable with the distributor;
One of the most valuable features of Kentik, especially for service providers, is its ability to visualize all the BGP peering and the status of the BGP peering platform.
Overall, the ease of use and the fact that it meets client expectations are major positives.
Kentik is easy to use and set up.
The automated reporting back, which includes identifying the top list and trends, as well as session monitoring from the end user to server through routers and firewalls, provides exact issue notifications for network problems.
The biggest benefit of ManageEngine OpManager for our customers is centrally managing the users and assets of an organization, along with link management, bandwidth management, and similar functionalities.
The dashboard is unique and user-friendly.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ManageEngine OpManager | 1.5% |
| Kentik | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
Kentik's AIOps Network Traffic Intelligence platform unifies network operations, performance, security, and business intelligence.
With a purpose-built big data engine delivered as public or private SaaS, Kentik captures a high-resolution view of actual network traffic data and enriches it with critical application and business data, so every network event or analysis can be tied to revenue & costs, customer & user experience, performance & risk.
ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
