We performed a comparison between kdb+ and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."The solution returns data quickly, and data retrieval is fast in kdb+."
"The solution operates well."
"The product handles high volumes very well and provides good integration."
"If you want to scale with new processes and new reports, that's fairly easy."
"The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well."
"What I like most are the dashboards and pervasive analytics."
"The best feature of SAP HANA is column computing. The computing speed of the solution is also very high, so developers can easily develop programs through SAP HANA."
"It has a very huge bandwidth and data transfer."
"Provides us with predictive capabilities for asset maintenance, and real-time forecasts."
"The solution should have a more user-friendly user interface."
"In my limited experience using SAP, the process of granting access to different modules is difficult. Specifically, the requirement to assign roles and key codes to users rather than being able to assign them individually made the process more complex. It would be beneficial if there was a way to assign key codes separately, rather than having to create multiple roles. This would make managing access easier."
"When we are using SAP HANA we have some difficulty with the customization. We would like to be able to add and make customized menus."
"I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has."
"The initial setup of SAP HANA is complex. We did the implementation of one site, and a global deployment will take another three to four years."
"The surface side or Attack dashboard needs improvement because there are some gaps after sales services."
"Uses a large amount of RAM and is costly."
"You cannot apply mulit-join inside the calculation views, for example, when you are joining tables."
"The solution is very expensive, however. The pricing depends on the number of users and many other factors that affect licensing."
kdb+ is ranked 19th in Relational Databases Tools with 1 review while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. kdb+ is rated 9.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of kdb+ writes "An easy-to-deploy solution that can be used for data ingestion and usage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". kdb+ is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory, MariaDB, SingleStore and SQL Server, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.