We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I rate Katalon Studio's scalability a four out of five."
"Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"It has been good so far for API testing on Mac. It is not that hard to learn and use. There is so much support out there, so if anyone wants to start using it, there is enough help."
"Smart Wait and XPath healing are valuable features."
"The basic framework and project organization is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is that everything can be managed from one platform."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is visual testing. It compares the look and feel of an application which is useful."
"The most valuable features of Katalon Studio are its user-friendliness and the AI smart healing capabilities."
"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."
"It offers a wide range of testing."
"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."
"The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP)."
"With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files."
"Micro Focus UFT One gives us integration capabilities with both API and GUI components. I like the user interface. It doesn't require that much skill to use and has automatic settings, which is useful for users who don't know what to select. It also has dark and light themes."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."
"The scalability of Micro Focus UFT One is good."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"Katalon Studio's pricing is expensive."
"They need to work on documentation to make it more centralized and easier to find what you are looking for."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"The product is comparatively slow."
"It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature."
"There is not much support offered for the free version, which is something that could be improved."
"The price of Katalon Studio is an area of concern where improvement is required."
"The solution does not have proper scripting."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."
"The artificial intelligence functionality is applicable only on the web, and it should be expanded to cover non-web applications as well."
"Object identification has room for improvement, to make it more efficient."
"We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes."
"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."
"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 41 reviews while OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Regression Testing Tools with 89 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, Appium, Testim and Ranorex Studio, whereas OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, SmartBear TestComplete, UiPath Test Suite and Ranorex Studio. See our Katalon Studio vs. OpenText UFT One report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors, best API Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
