OpenText UFT One and UiPath Test Cloud both operate in the test automation tools category. UiPath Test Cloud appears to have the upper hand due to its integrated suite of tools and flexibility with cloud deployment options.
Features: OpenText UFT One supports a broad spectrum of browsers and environments, offers advanced functionalities including integration with ALM configurations, and supports various test types like GUI and API. UiPath Test Cloud provides robust document understanding, offers simplified maintenance, and integrates seamlessly with its extensive suite of tools.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One users highlight the need for better object recognition, improved browser compatibility, and more efficient integration with .NET applications, alongside concerns about resource consumption and speed. UiPath Test Cloud users suggest enhancing its Test Manager tool, improving manual testing integration, and better management of test files stored in the cloud.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One typically runs on-premises, with reliable but sometimes slow technical support. UiPath Test Cloud offers deployment flexibility through public and hybrid cloud options, with quick and responsive technical support. Both tools have scalable support, but UiPath’s cloud-native capabilities ease deployment.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is considered expensive due to licensing costs but offers strong ROI for extensive automation needs across platforms. UiPath Test Cloud also has a high cost but offers competitive pricing for its features. It provides compelling ROI when used for comprehensive automation tasks, although costs might be a barrier for smaller enterprises.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.
Read white paper
UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.
UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.
What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
