Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs Morphisec comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kaspersky and Morphisec are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Kaspersky is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.7, while Morphisec is ranked #60. Kaspersky holds a 1.1% mindshare in EDR, compared to Morphisec’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Morphisec users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

Morphisec and Kaspersky compete in the endpoint security category. Morphisec seems to have the edge given its lightweight solution and aggressive cost savings, while Kaspersky focuses on detailed threat reports and centralized management.

Features: Morphisec provides comprehensive threat protection without relying on signatures, integrating seamlessly with Microsoft Defender for full visibility through a single console. It emphasizes deterministic attack prevention that adapts autonomously, ensuring no impact on endpoint performance. In contrast, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response emphasizes advanced behavioral detection features, centralized control, and enhanced threat coverage, making it a comprehensive user security management tool.

Room for Improvement: Morphisec could enhance customer interaction through regular updates and more dynamic reporting. Users also seek improved network discovery and simplified licensing across cloud platforms. Kaspersky's interface complexity and lack of configuration options need improvement, as well as AI threat detection and integration capabilities. Both need to address false positives and improve technical support responsiveness, with Kaspersky also needing to reduce system resource usage in cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Morphisec offers deployment flexibility across public, private, hybrid, and on-premises environments. Its setup is noted for ease and fast technical support with strong follow-up. Kaspersky focuses on on-premises and hybrid solutions but faces criticism for complex CLI command use during maintenance. While generally good, their support can be hindered by ambiguous communication and delayed response times in escalations.

Pricing and ROI: Morphisec is priced competitively, often more affordable than premium solutions like CrowdStrike, delivering cost-effective protection per endpoint. Customers report satisfaction with ROI due to a reduced workload and enhanced security. Kaspersky's pricing, while reasonable, is slightly higher, needing significant resource investment to realize full potential. Both solutions provide effective threat mitigation with positive ROI, though Morphisec offers more aggressive cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs. Morphisec Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs. Morphisec

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next XDR Expert is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Morphisec is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Kaspersky Next XDR Expert	1.1%
Morphisec	0.9%
Other	94.3%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Manikumar David

IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates

Experienced weak security checks and increased system load with limited control

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is not up to the mark compared to what I have seen from earlier products. I was using CrowdStrike, and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is not up to the mark compared to CrowdStrike and other products. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response sometimes seems to allow certain files which should not be allowed on its own. I trust Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response to check the files, but I cannot sit and check all the files that are coming in. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response has its own weaknesses. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response slows the system slightly. It uses more resources than what CrowdStrike does. When any attack happens or something is happening with other products I am using, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.

Read full review

Rick Schibler

VP of Information Technology at Kentucky Trailer

Offers in-memory protection at a lower price than competitors

Morphisec's in-memory protection is probably the most valuable feature because it stops malicious activity from occurring. If something tries to install or act as a sleeper agent, Morphisec will detect and stop it. Morphisec's Moving Target Defense is critical to hardening our attack surface. If it detects something, it indicates whether it's valid. That means you've got a breach requiring investigation. It detects anomalies but doesn't necessarily point to what caused them. You still need to do that work. The solution is reasonably easy to administer. They made some changes last year, adding a cloud-based monitoring solution that makes deploying and monitoring our endpoints easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is a new generation XDR that has a lot of artificial intelligence modules."

"Cortex XDR is a very capable solution for protecting large networks and a lot of endpoints. It's very useful because the automation is very high, and if you combine it with the features on Palo Alto firewalls, it provides very strong protection."

"Cortex XDR lets us manage several clients from the same console, and its endpoint defense is more advanced than traditional antivirus."

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome. That is pretty much the use of it. What blows your mind is the ability to access your assets remotely and see what is actually going on with them. You can not only see them in a console. You can also react very rapidly to your assets that are compromised."

"The main benefit of using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks while employing Palo Alto Firewall at the internet edge is that it improves security on our endpoint devices, integrating seamlessly with Palo Alto Firewalls to deliver comprehensive network, analyst, and security details all in a single dashboard, which allows us to manage everything from our network devices."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance."

"The most valuable feature is that you can select remote access of any machine for sandboxing."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"I have Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response firewall on my computer, which sits at the gate, so I manage maximum things through that."

"We have a concept of working from home. Most endpoints are not in the domain. It is our first line of defense. While we had Kaspersky deployed, it gave good insight into the upcoming challenge or threat."

"It is a secure solution with a lot of IT management features."

"One of the most valuable aspects of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions is their ability to detect and respond to spam and viruses in their early stages."

"The advanced detection features are valuable."

"From my point of view, one of the best aspects of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is its high detection rate, which surpasses many other solutions. Its valuable features include behavior detection, threat prevention, device control, adaptive anomaly control, and centralized protection detection."

"It is a stable solution...It is a very scalable solution."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Kaspersky Next XDR Expert pros

"Morphisec also provides full visibility into security events for Microsoft Defender and Morphisec in one dashboard... in the single pane of glass provided by Morphisec, it's all right there at your fingertips: easy to access and easy to understand. And if you choose to go down further to know everything from the process to the hash behind it, you can."

"With Morphisec, at least when it does happen, I feel confident that we have in place solutions that will not only prevent it, but also let us know when something has happened."

"Morphisec has enabled us to become a lot less paranoid when it comes to staff clicking on things or accessing things that they shouldn't that could infect the whole system. Our original ransomware attack that happened came from someone's Google drive and then just filtered on through that. It has put our minds at ease a lot more in running it. It's also another layer of security that has been proven to be effective for us."

"Morphisec has absolutely helped save money on our security stack. The ransomware at the end of the day can cost organizations millions upon millions of dollars. Investing in tools like Morphisec is a great reduction in that cost. If I can spend $10,000 in a year to protect assets that could be ransomed for $20,000,000, that's definitely a bet that one should pursue. Morphisec absolutely it's worth the investment."

"We haven't had any cybersecurity incidents on machines running Morphisec."

"The fact that Morphisec uses deterministic attack prevention that does not require human intervention has affected our security team's operations by making things much simpler. We don't have to really track down various alerts anymore, they've just stopped. At that point, we can go in and we can clean up whatever needs to be cleaned up. There are some things that Morphisec detects that we can't really remove, it's parts of Internet Explorer, but it's being blocked anyway. So we're happy with that."

"Morphisec as the last line of defense is as good as you can get."

"In a month, we are saving the effort of four to five days, and earlier we used to have a dedicated person and now we don't need a dedicated resource, which has reduced our security spending and we are saving approximately $600 a month."

More Morphisec pros

Cons

"There's an overall lack of features."

"Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms."

"The onboarding process could be better."

"The solution should add unwanted malicious hash values to a block list so that whenever the action is triggered, it will automatically prevent the malicious content."

"Currently, if you use Palo Alto endpoint protection as the only solution it's very complicated to remove pre-existing threats."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response."

"Based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response needs vast resources on the central node. Not all maintenance tasks are in the GUI, so we often use commands. The lack of documentation for these processes means we frequently reach out to support, open tickets, and run complex CLI commands. It's not the most straightforward process. It should also improve stability."

"My team was struggling with the reporting when we were doing an audit. The console features are a little more interactive and user-friendly. There's some issue, or maybe some fixing has to be done."

"First, it would be beneficial if they could optimize the solution to be less resource-intensive, as it currently tends to put a heavy load on our machines and requires specialized servers for deployment."

"Incorporating an AI protection tool with the capability to detect and prevent zero-day threats, particularly those with a five-star rating in terms of severity would be beneficial."

"I think it's just a normal tool; compared to other market EDRs, this is a very poor product."

"One of the main areas where the tool could improve is its integration capabilities. For example, I find it challenging to integrate it with other solutions. It would be helpful if the tool could make it more open to integration with other tools."

"Enhancing user-friendliness should be a priority."

"The main issue was compatibility with the cloud itself. The CPU usage immediately spiked, causing the machines to hang and sometimes even forcing server or computer restarts."

More Kaspersky Next XDR Expert cons

"The only problem is that their support lives in Israel, so the time zones are a bit off, but I've never had any complaint beyond that."

"In the Windows Defender integration, they have put in a report of computers that need Windows Defender updates. If those updates could be kicked off directly from the dashboard, instead of having to go to another system entirely, that would be good."

"I haven't been able to get the cloud deployment to work."

"I haven't been able to get the cloud deployment to work. When there's an update, I'm supposed to be able to roll it out for the cloud solution, but right now I'm continuing to use our SCCM solution to update it."

"Morphisec is a venture startup. They are still early in their growth stage. They need to get mature on their customer support and on how they interface with system tools."

"It would be nice if they could integrate Morphisec with other traditional antivirus solutions beyond Microsoft Defender. That is probably my biggest gripe."

"Right now, it's just their auto-update feature. I know they are currently working on that."

"If anything, tech support might be their weakest link."

More Morphisec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"Very costly product."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I was satisfied with the pricing of Kaspersky."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The pricing falls within the average range."

"It is cost-effective in terms of services and features compared to other more expensive EDR solutions like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro."

"I would say that their pricing is generally competitive and attractive."

"The product is cheap."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution."

More Kaspersky Next XDR Expert pricing and cost advice

"It is priced correctly for what it does. They end up doing a good deal of discounting, but I think it is priced appropriately."

"Price-wise, it's on the higher side. A traditional antivirus solution is cheaper, but in terms of security and manageability, its ROI is better than a traditional antivirus. I would recommend it to anybody evaluating or considering an antivirus solution. If your system gets compromised, the cost of ransom would be a lot more. This way, it saves a lot of cost."

"Licenses are per endpoint, and that's true for the cloud version as well. The only difference is that there is a little extra charge for the cloud version."

"Our licensing is tied into our contract. Because we have a long-term contract, our pricing is a little bit lower. It is per year, so we don't get charged per endpoint, but we do have a cap. Our cap is 80 endpoints. If we were to go over 80, when we renewed our contract, which is not until three years are over. Then, they would reevaluate, and say, "Well, you have more than 80 devices active right now. This is going to be the price change." They know that we are installing and replacing computers, so the numbers will be all over the place depending on whether you archive or don't archive, which is the reason why we just have to keep up on that stuff."

"It is an annual subscription basis per device. For the devices that we have in scope right now, it is about $25,000 a year."

"Morphisec is reasonably priced because our parent company's other subsidiaries use different products like CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is four or five times more expensive than Morphisec. The competitive pricing saves us money in our overall security stack."

"It does not have multi-tenants. If South Africa wants to show only the machines that they have, they need their own cloud incidence. It is not possible to have that in a single cloud incidence with multiple tenants in it, instead you need to have multiple cloud incidences. Then, if you have that, it will be more expensive. However, they are going to change that, which is good."

"We are still using a separate tool. I know for our 600 or I think we're actually licensed for up to 700 users, it runs me 23 or $24,000 a year. When you're talking to that many users plus servers being protected, that's well worth the investment for that dollar amount."

More Morphisec pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	55

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is not up to the mark compared to what I have seen from earlier products. I...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

It seems okay. CrowdStrike was not heavy on my network or usage. I would rate this product an 8.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Next XDR Expert

Compared 13% of the time

ESET EDR/XDR vs Kaspersky Next XDR Expert

Compared 9% of the time

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Kaspersky Next XDR Expert

Compared 6% of the time

MaxPatrol EDR vs Kaspersky Next XDR Expert

Compared 5% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Kaspersky Next XDR Expert

Compared 2% of the time

More Kaspersky Next XDR Expert Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Morphisec

Compared 9% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs Morphisec

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Morphisec

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Morphisec

Compared 4% of the time

Orca Security vs Morphisec

Compared 4% of the time

More Morphisec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next XDR Expert

September 2026

Download Kaspersky Next XDR Expert product report

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec

September 2026

Download Morphisec product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Morphisec, Morphisec Moving Target Defense

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response integrates antivirus, threat response, and EDR with high detection rates, behavior detection, and device control. It supports centralized management for seamless operation across remote and on-premise servers.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a robust platform featuring automated responses, advanced reporting, and customizable policies. Users appreciate its lightweight agent and compatibility, though many report issues with stability and resource intensity. While effective in malware detection and incident response, challenges remain in configuration, integration, and efficient patch management. Zero-day detection and cloud version stability have room for improvement. However, its capabilities make it highly recommended in regions like Pakistan.

What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

High Detection Rates: Combines antivirus and EDR to ensure comprehensive threat detection.
Centralized Management: Offers seamless integration with remote and on-premise servers for efficient oversight.
Advanced Reporting: Provides detailed insights and analytics to support informed security decisions.
Behavior Detection: Identifies anomalous endpoint behavior for proactive threat action.
Device Control: Enables USB usage control and website blocking to enhance security measures.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

Automated Responses: Streamlines incident management with minimal manual intervention.
Ease of Use: Facilitates quick deployment and management with intuitive functionality.
Customizable Policies: Offers flexibility to tailor security settings to specific needs.
Endpoint Monitoring: Provides comprehensive visibility across devices to ensure efficient threat mitigation.

In industries prioritizing security, such as finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids in threat hunting and behavior analysis. It integrates with SIEM systems, allowing precise encryption, targeted attack protection, and device management. Deployed on servers, workstations, and mobile devices, it's particularly esteemed in areas like Pakistan for its robust capabilities.

Kaspersky

Morphisec enhances security with its signatureless attack prevention, integrating smoothly with Microsoft Defender. Users benefit from real-time threat detection and seamless system integration, protecting against zero-day threats and ransomware across networks.

Morphisec's security solution focuses on preventing cyber threats without requiring threat signatures or user action. Its integration with Microsoft Defender offers simplified visibility and management while delivering quick responses. Lightweight in nature, Morphisec ensures zero performance degradation and employs in-memory protection along with Moving Target Defense. This approach effectively counters zero-day threats and ransomware, maintaining a user-centric dashboard that eases administrative workloads. Morphisec's easy deployment also enables small teams to manage risks and uphold robust security measures efficiently.

What are Morphisec's key features?

Signatureless Threat Prevention: Stops attacks without threat signatures or user interaction.
Microsoft Defender Integration: Provides unified management and quick response capabilities.
In-Memory Protection: Shields against zero-day and ransomware threats efficiently.
Moving Target Defense: Minimizes exposure to in-memory attacks.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Simplifies administration by reducing burdens.
Easy Deployment: Facilitates straightforward setup for small teams.

What benefits and ROI should be considered in user reviews?

Real-Time Detection: Immediate identification of threats enhances proactive threat management.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with existing systems, reducing delay risks.
Cloud-Based Updates: Ensures current protection with minimal manual input.
Multi-Layered Security: Adds a solid last defense layer, supplementing other antivirus solutions.

Morphisec is widely used across industries like financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing to bolster defenses against malware and ransomware. Its deployment spans workstations and servers, integrating efficiently into existing infrastructures. Industries value real-time threat detection, ease of deployment, and cloud-based updates, noting its ability to identify threats missed by other antivirus solutions.

Morphisec

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Lenovo/Motorola, TruGreen, Covenant Health, Citizens Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs. Morphisec

September 2026

Free Report: Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs. Morphisec

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs. Morphisec and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs. Morphisec report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.