Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs Tanium comparison

Kaspersky and Tanium are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Kaspersky is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.1, while Tanium is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.1. Kaspersky holds a 1.2% mindshare in EDR, compared to Tanium’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Tanium users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Tanium and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert compete in the cybersecurity solutions sector. Tanium has the upper hand in scalability and enterprise readiness, making it ideal for complex environments, while Kaspersky excels in advanced threat detection capabilities.

Features: Tanium offers rapid data retrieval, real-time visibility into large networks, and comprehensive patch management, making it well-suited for expansive infrastructures. Kaspersky provides advanced threat intelligence, automated response capabilities, and strong endpoint protection, offering a feature-rich package for organizations focused on cybersecurity.

Room for Improvement: Tanium could benefit from broader platform support, improved UI interaction, and simplified access for restricted environments. Kaspersky could enhance its machine-learning algorithms, reduce false positives, and streamline its central console interface for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tanium's deployment is detailed with extensive customization supported by robust customer service, ideal for large-scale implementations. Kaspersky facilitates quicker deployment with straightforward integration and prompt customer service, appealing to organizations requiring swift implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Tanium's pricing reflects its robust feature set for large enterprises, focusing on long-term ROI, with potentially higher initial setup costs. Kaspersky presents moderate upfront costs with a quicker perceived ROI due to its enhanced features, making it attractive for organizations prioritizing immediate threat mitigation benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs. Tanium Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs. Tanium

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Expert is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tanium is 2.0%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
Kaspersky Next EDR Expert	1.2%
Tanium	2.0%
Other	93.2%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Ravi-Upadhyay

Founder at Inspira Enterprise

Provides strong threat detection and response through behavior analytics and network isolation

I have found the most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert to be its ability to tackle the biggest challenges customers face when they have to mitigate any kind of a malware, ransomware attack, or online theft scenarios. The solution utilizes its HIPS, which is the host intrusion prevention system, behavior analytics system, and device control mechanism, making the antivirus capabilities of EDR quite strong. It is able to detect zero-day threats as well as historical or legacy malware, providing protection against current threats in the market and legacy malware. My opinion on the advanced threat detection algorithms in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is that the ATP functionality is quite strong because it utilizes the behavioral analytics engine in the backend, which employs machine learning mechanisms to identify any kind of vulnerability or exploit running on the operating system level and the network level. If an attack is about to happen on the endpoint, it is able to protect over the network as well and checks for any illegitimate encryption activities. The machine learning capability within Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has contributed to improving detection accuracy and reducing false positives in my environment by helping me identify malicious activity and differentiate between any malicious activity on the operating system level and on the network level. I have seen customers with in-house developed applications that have no public signatures available. Once I whitelist a particular application, it intelligently whitelists not only the executable but also all the dependent services required to run that application. Furthermore, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has successfully blocked network-level attacks on the endpoint. For example, during a recent DoS attack aimed at choking the entire network, Kaspersky detected the attack, isolated the device in a sandbox network, and alerted my SOC team via email for corrective action, thereby proactively helping me detect and protect devices from malicious attacks.

Read full review

Mairajuddin Ahmed

Division Manager, Information Technology at a legal firm with 51-200 employees

Centralized policies have improved remote endpoint control and have simplified data visibility

The integration is not simple and easy. It requires experienced users or people who have done the implementation. When certain policies are applied, they do not immediately push the policies. For example, we manage endpoint device USB access. We set a policy to block it, but it does not come into effect immediately. Sometimes it takes three or four days for it to reflect. That is a pain point. I have raised this issue with support as well, but they said that I need to limit the number of devices in the policy. In terms of application deployment, for us, it was seamless.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable. We chose Traps because it is the only product that we were not able to get anything past."

"It'll not slow down your system when compared to others."

"In one single alert, we are getting the network telemetry, endpoint telemetry, email security telemetry, and proxy telemetry all in one single ticket, making it very easy."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"The integrations are out-of-the-box, as are the playbooks."

"Threat identification and detection are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."

"What I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it is a comprehensive solution that contains everything the organization may need when using endpoints."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky EDR is its simplicity. The console is easy to use and not very complex."

"We enjoy the solution as, when we are online we are secure."

"We previously used Sophos, Crowdstrike, and Microsoft Defender, and the most important reason we transitioned to Kaspersky is the agent that is installed in the endpoints on the cash machine, as the Kaspersky agent is really soft while with the others we noticed that their agents would stop, so that made a big difference."

"Provides web and DNS protection over https."

"The installation of the physical servers is very simple, but the software is not that simple."

"I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans."

"The features I appreciate most about this solution are its good response time, speed, and reliability; it detects most antiviruses and identifies viruses that other antivirus solutions don't detect."

"The performance for Kaspersky is good, and it's not impacted our client performance."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pros

"Tanium’s best features include support for any Windows, Linux, or Mac endpoint, regardless of where it is, and the ability to do IT operations and security operations."

"The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors."

"For incident response tasks, all these tasks can get done in minutes with minimal disruption to the end-user."

"The solution is scalable and helps to understand how infrastructure works. It helps to improve the health of the organization."

"I like the tool's incident response and security patching."

"Tanium is used for endpoint management, specifically patching and configuration management."

"Tanium is highly scalable."

"When I push a quick update, it's done right away, and I can rescan immediately to confirm completion within minutes."

More Tanium pros

Cons

"It's very time-consuming to log support issues and the people that answer the tickets aren't very knowledgeable."

"I think sometimes Cortex XDR agent automatically stops event capturing from the device, and then even the dashboard does not get any notifications from the agent."

"The dashboard could use some significant improvement, just making it more useful with more information. It has a limited amount of information right now. It is customizable, but I'd love to see a better out-of-box dashboard."

"There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly."

"I feel that it should not be a licensed activity because a feature should allow us to see applications running on end devices."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

"They've been having some issues with updating their endpoint agents, and it has been quite frustrating."

"The deployment is pretty hard."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"There are some cases that take three days to deal with. It's too long."

"There are some issues with EDR's web policy blocking sites that are marked as exceptions."

"It is not easy to follow the kill chain of a potential infection or malware."

"Kaspersky EDR currently has limited OS support. They only focus on Windows Server and Windows."

"The user interface of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert could be more intuitive, and I would appreciate more flexibility or optimization in certain aspects."

"The solution is expensive in comparison to CheckPoint and Fortinet."

"We'd like more integrations to be available in the future."

"The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert cons

"The problem or challenge is a pre-sales and go-to strategy for the SMB market delivered through a channel or model. It's very convoluted and vague, which leads to some confusion about the various types of modules, and the device-to-seat cost is extremely difficult to calculate."

"I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments."

"Tanium's limitations should be improved because although it is a great tool, it is limited to only a few classes during a session."

"There are downsides and drawbacks in Tanium, and there is room for improvement from my perspective."

"The main issues are the network connection because different customers have issues with their networks. It's difficult implementing this type of solution because the network is the main feature in the architecture for these types of solutions. Tanium could improve by creating some network optimization."

"They could improve the UI."

"There are some bugs in the product. The tool needs to improve in the area of reporting."

"Tanium required local admin or root rights on Mac devices, which did not comply with our security policies. This made the solution less suitable for our restrictive environment."

More Tanium cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"The solution is worth its cost so I rate pricing a ten out of ten."

"Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis."

"We have been satisfied with the license of the solution."

"The license for EDR costs about 1,000 pesos per user. I would rate the pricing as four out of five."

"We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better."

"The solution is expensive in comparison to CheckPoint and Fortinet."

"The pricing is reasonable. Not too cheap, not too expensive."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pricing and cost advice

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

"The solution offers value for money."

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	53

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The price of the solution is economical.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The user interface of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert could be more intuitive, and I would appreciat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

My usual use cases for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert involve detecting ransomware earlier and proa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tanium?

While there is always room for improvement, I am pleased with Tanium.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

The primary use case for Tanium ( /products/tanium-reviews ) is compliance, patching, and inventory as part of the co...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tanium?

For smaller companies, Tanium is quite a big investment, and one needs to have a considerable setup to make it econom...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 12% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 9% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 5% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 4% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 3% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 1% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

June 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Expert product report

Buyer's Guide

Tanium

June 2026

Download Tanium product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Kaspersky EDR

Tanium Inc Cloud, Tanium XEM

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a robust cybersecurity tool that delivers protection against cyberthreats while enhancing visibility and response capabilities for IT security teams.

This comprehensive solution integrates with Endpoint Protection Platform to block and detect cyberthreats while providing tools for IT security professionals. Backed by 30 years of experience, it is trusted by over 600 enterprise customers, safeguarding more than 2.5 million endpoints across the globe. The system is built with a powerful set of detection engines, enabling proactive threat investigation with clear visualization. It features an open architecture supporting broad integration capabilities, making it versatile for diverse IT environments.

What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses machine learning and behavior analytics to identify sophisticated threats.
Comprehensive Endpoint Protection: Provides robust security measures, including intrusion prevention and firewall capabilities.
Open Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Kaspersky SIEM, Endpoint Security, and third-party workflows.
Embedded Sandbox: Analyzes suspicious files in depth to determine threat levels.
Centralized Management: Facilitates encryption and reporting for enhanced usability.

What benefits can users expect when using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Effective Security: Offers reliable protection against malware and ransomware.
Scalability: Designed to support expanding infrastructures.
Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with centralized control.
Responsive Support: Provides swift assistance for technical issues.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and corporate IT, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is employed for network and endpoint security, shielding against malware, zero-day threats, and unauthorized access. It empowers these sectors with enhanced threat intelligence, secure data protection, and effective patch management, facilitating robust protection across diverse ecosystems.

Kaspersky

Tanium offers robust endpoint protection, patching, and inventory management, consolidating the functions of tools like BigFix with capabilities in incident response, network security, and cloud or on-premise deployments.

Known for real-time capabilities, Tanium provides detailed analytics, security features, and device management. Users benefit from quick implementation, real-time updates, and patching campaigns. Despite its strengths, integration and custom plugin expansion remain areas to improve, along with data visualization and network optimization. Reporting enhancements and user training could advance its usability, and some UI elements may require updates for clarity and security.

What are the essential features of Tanium?

Detailed Analytics: Provides actionable insights for better decision-making.
Security Capabilities: Offers strong defense measures against threats.
Real-Time Queries: Facilitates immediate information access.
Patch Management: Streamlines software updates across devices.
Device Management: Efficiently handles comprehensive inventory and monitoring tasks.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex IT tasks.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT infrastructure needs.
Integration Flexibility: Merges with existing systems effortlessly.
Real-Time Updates: Ensures current data availability for informed actions.

Tanium's deployment spans industries focusing on endpoint protection and compliance, ensuring reliable device and server management in settings where safety and quick adaptation are critical. Organizations use it for application deployment, compliance checks, and integrating it as an EDR solution, enhancing overall security and operational efficiencies.

Tanium

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs. Tanium

June 2026

Free Report: Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs. Tanium

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs. Tanium and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs. Tanium report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.