Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jira vs nTask comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jira
Ranking in Project Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
274
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd)
nTask
Ranking in Project Management Software
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Jira is 9.2%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of nTask is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Grigoriy Kneller - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for agile management and project tracking
Setting up on Windows is very easy, while on Linux, it's a bit more complicated. I would rate it around a seven out of ten. It is possible to deploy it both on the cloud and on-premises. The deployment duration varied based on whether it was on the cloud or a server. If it was on the cloud, it took slightly less time, while installing it on a server took anywhere from ten minutes to an hour.
Ayesha Mujeeb - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, cost-effective, and efficient
The most valuable feature of nTask is its user-friendly interface. Its simplicity makes it easy to navigate, and the consistent structure across modules means the tool guides you intuitively. This is especially beneficial for those who aren't tech-savvy or haven't worked with complex tools before. Being part of a small team, cost efficiency is crucial for us, and nTask fits well within our budget while providing all the necessary features. Additionally, we find the Gantt chart feature particularly useful for planning fundraisers with various task dependencies. The reporting feature ensures accuracy in our financial work. Being a small team, we appreciate nTask's customization options in the business plan.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We can cope with processes easily without adapting the tool, but adapting the tool to processes."
"We have the best community to support any problems that we have."
"Kanban board: The board is easy to use and visually impressive to non-IT users, who found it easy to relate to."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The level of stability is quite good."
"It was easy to use. The consultants that we had on board were familiar with it. So, obviously, having a community that had used it before or was familiar with it was a positive thing."
"It's very flexible. I can define workflows and custom fields and dependencies between issues and projects. And every project can have a custom configuration with my fields, my names for fields, my validations, and my workflows. It's very customizable."
"The solution is easy to use and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of nTask is its user-friendly interface."
 

Cons

"Once a story is closed, all the records, versions, and documentation associated with it are gone. We lose the traceability of what was done."
"The CACD solutions on JIRA has some plugins, but they are not easily understandable or workable."
"The tool should improve its pricing."
"The dashboard reports can be improved. Its dashboard reports are good, but you cannot have complex reports. They are currently very basic. For instance, we can only choose two columns for a dashboard, so it is not friendly enough."
"There's a really steep learning curve for configuration."
"Its ability to perform true executive-level status reporting could be improved. There are a lot of benefits there, but there are also a lot of things they can and should expand upon."
"It should have its own repository for test case creation, so that one does not have to resort to third-party tools and plugins."
"Sometimes the solution doesn't communicate well with other platforms. It's quite difficult to integrate things and make the data flow from A to B, to Jira, and then back to other areas."
"nTask currently lacks a direct chat or communication feature."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price at the moment for Jira is okay. I'm absolutely not amused with the plans to try to drive us to the cloud or to other licensing models. For the very simple reason that we are a company in the defense sector where cloud is problematic in a number of the domains. We are now approximately 60 users and the new policy will actually confront us with an upscale to approximately 500 users. I find it unacceptable, and may potentially lead us to look for another solution."
"It does not cost that much."
"We are a regional research and education institute. We're using the free license provided for educational institutes."
"The standard package of Jira is for 100 users. They should offer more packages for other increments, such as 500 or 2,000. In my previous company, there was a free package that provided a minimal number of users."
"The ballpark figure is about $100 a month."
"The price of the solution could be lower."
"There are other solutions that are free making this solution seem expensive in comparison."
"It's not very cheap. It's also not very costly. I'd rate it a five out of ten in terms of pricing."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
49%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?
We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.
What do you like most about nTask?
The most valuable feature of nTask is its user-friendly interface.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for nTask?
The nTask team was accommodating and offered us a discount as a startup. For our business plan on nTask, we pay $8 per month per user. Opting for the annual subscription, the cost comes to around $...
What needs improvement with nTask?
While nTask serves our business needs well, there is room for improvement in a couple of areas. Firstly, in terms of the user interface, some other project management tools offer smoother interface...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Jira Software
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: April 2025.
850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.