ITRS Geneos vs Nagios Fusion comparison

ITRS and Nagios are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ITRS is ranked #42 with an average rating of 6.5, while Nagios is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.5. ITRS holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Nagios’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

2,132 Views
1,206 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nagios Fusion

Read 4 Nagios Fusion reviews

287 Views
207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Nagios Fusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

In the IT infrastructure monitoring domain, ITRS Geneos and Nagios Fusion are key competitors. ITRS Geneos generally has the upper hand in terms of ease of deployment and customer service, while Nagios Fusion is preferred for its robust feature set and extensive monitoring capabilities.

Features: ITRS Geneos provides advanced real-time monitoring, comprehensive analytical tools, and deep insights into complex systems. Nagios Fusion offers data aggregation across distributed networks, centralized system overview, and customizable alerts, catering to environments with vast IT assets.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos could enhance its setup simplicity, increase feature integration for broader functionality, and improve scalability for larger systems. Nagios Fusion might focus on delivering more personalized customer support, expanding its advanced analytics capabilities, and refining its user interface for better intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos requires a more detailed setup process but offers highly rated and supportive customer service to ease implementation and support. Nagios Fusion is quicker to deploy with a simpler setup but lacks the personal touch in customer service found in Geneos.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos involves higher initial setup costs, justified by enhanced ROI through detailed analytics and performance tracking. Nagios Fusion provides a lower-cost setup, emphasizing operational efficiency and reduced total ownership cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Fusion Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Fusion

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

42nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (35th), Network Monitoring Software (63rd)

Nagios Fusion

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

47th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Fusion is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

SyarulIdzuddin Adzmi

Operation Director at Digital Pulse Sdn Bhd

A suitable choice for unified and efficient infrastructure monitoring across diverse environments providing user-friendly GUI, cost-effectiveness, and versatility

We use it for this specific client, they've deployed multiple instances of it across various locations to facilitate monitoring. To effectively monitor their infrastructure, it seems necessary to implement additional monitoring solutions for all three types of devices they have Nagios Fusion…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"The built-in plug-ins allow administrators to easily configure monitoring components for market data systems such as Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform and SRLabs Wombat (formerly NYSE)."

"The clean and colorful UI and easy to use options like snooze and active times."

"The solution is used across the entire investment banking division, covering environments such as electronic trading, algo-trading, fixed income, FX, etc. It monitors that environment and enables a bank to significantly reduce down time. Although hard to measure, since implementation, we have probably seen some increased stability because of it and we have definitely seen teams a lot more aware of their environment. Consequently, we can be more proactive in challenging and improving previously undetected weaknesses."

"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment."

"Being open source lets us customize it for our monitoring needs, saving us money."

"It's very easy to manage and monitor it."

"It is easier for client installation, and the configurations are doable even for a newcomer in the field."

Cons

"Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs."

"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app. This is something that probably everyone asks when they see the tool and they see how powerful it is. If there is any mobile app for this or if there is any way this tool can be more easily accessible other than having a big client installed, it would be great. I know you can build dashboards, et cetera, but there is no quick and easy way. I should be able to download an app, log in, and see my status. That will put this product above everything else out there. I believe it's on their roadmap."

"One thing that could be improved in terms of rapid scaling would be more ability to clone aspects of an implementation. It seems like there are opportunities in this area, where we have repetitive tasks to do when it comes to implementing things on new servers or on new gateways. It would be great if there was an easy way to clone something that had already been done."

"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"Nagios Fusion should include a 'remember me' option when logging in, so we don't need to enter a username and password every time."

"Adding application performance monitoring to the product alongside infrastructure monitoring would make it a more complete and useful solution."

"There are some bugs, although not that many. There are some situations where the solution is not stable but the number of problems is not very high."

"In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is quite reasonable, especially when compared to the broader market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

76%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Fusion?

Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Fusion?

In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nagios Fusion?

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Nagios XI vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 62% of the time

Icinga vs Nagios Fusion

Compared 38% of the time

More Nagios Fusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

May 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

April 2025

Download Nagios Fusion product report

Also Known As

Geneos

No data available

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Nagios Enterprises delivers official products, services, and solutions for and around Nagios – the industry standard in enterprise-grade IT infrastructure monitoring. With millions of users worldwide, Nagios is the undisputed champion in the IT monitoring space. Our team of dedicated professionals works to ensure total customer satisfaction with all the services we provide. Our extensive network of partners helps extend Nagios services and solutions to new organizations and markets worldwide to meet a variety of business needs. Nagios Enterprises was founded in 2007 by Ethan Galstad. Ethan created what would later become known as Nagios in 1999, and currently serves as the President of Nagios Enterprises.

Nagios

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

NuBlue, St.Elisabeth Hospital, Akamit Systems, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, ValueClick, Sunrise Banks

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Fusion

April 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Fusion

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Fusion and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Nagios Fusion report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.