Icinga vs Nagios Fusion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Icinga Logo
3,564 views|3,156 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Nagios Logo
394 views|314 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Icinga and Nagios Fusion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. Nagios Fusion Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine.""The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.""This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted.""We have found the solution to be stable.""The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything.""Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga.""Icinga does the job and is fairly stable.""I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

More Icinga Pros →

"It's very easy to manage and monitor it.""Being open source lets us customize it for our monitoring needs, saving us money.""It is easier for client installation, and the configurations are doable even for a newcomer in the field.""Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment."

More Nagios Fusion Pros →

Cons
"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me.""Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do.""Icinga’s automation could be improved.""In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI.""The user interface should be improved.""The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support.""One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine.""I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

More Icinga Cons →

"Adding application performance monitoring to the product alongside infrastructure monitoring would make it a more complete and useful solution.""In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software.""Nagios Fusion should include a 'remember me' option when logging in, so we don't need to enter a username and password every time.""There are some bugs, although not that many. There are some situations where the solution is not stable but the number of problems is not very high."

More Nagios Fusion Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."
  • "This is an open-source solution with paid support."
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "We're using the free version of Icinga."
  • "Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."
  • "The solution is free to use."
  • "The solution is cheap."
  • More Icinga Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is quite reasonable, especially when compared to the broader market."
  • More Nagios Fusion Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.
    Top Answer:I wasn't involved with the finance side of the product. I just tested the product and gave feedback to the IT team in our company.
    Top Answer:I didn't have a problem with Icinga since I just use it for monitoring purposes. I haven't faced any issues with Icinga to date, and I think that it is a good solution. Right now, in my company… more »
    Top Answer:Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment.
    Top Answer:In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,564
    Comparisons
    3,156
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    596
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    394
    Comparisons
    314
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Zabbix logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Checkmk logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Nagios Core logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Nagios XI logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Centreon logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Icinga Cloud Monitoring
    Learn More
    Overview
    Icinga monitors infrastructures of all sizes with the integrated cluster system secured by SSL, Integrates with DevOps tools and uses an object based configuration or provision on users' monitoring code through the REST API. Icinga has a lightweight and extensible web interface to keep an eye on your environment and provides modules that extend the functionality of Icinga Web 2. Additionally, it offers a fully preconfigured monitoring stack or just add an external perspective.

    Nagios Enterprises delivers official products, services, and solutions for and around Nagios – the industry standard in enterprise-grade IT infrastructure monitoring. With millions of users worldwide, Nagios is the undisputed champion in the IT monitoring space. Our team of dedicated professionals works to ensure total customer satisfaction with all the services we provide. Our extensive network of partners helps extend Nagios services and solutions to new organizations and markets worldwide to meet a variety of business needs. Nagios Enterprises was founded in 2007 by Ethan Galstad. Ethan created what would later become known as Nagios in 1999, and currently serves as the President of Nagios Enterprises.

    Sample Customers
    Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
    NuBlue, St.Elisabeth Hospital, Akamit Systems, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, ValueClick, Sunrise Banks
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Educational Organization14%
    University14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Icinga vs. Nagios Fusion
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. Nagios Fusion and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Icinga is ranked 23rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 16 reviews while Nagios Fusion is ranked 49th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 4 reviews. Icinga is rated 7.6, while Nagios Fusion is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Icinga writes "A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nagios Fusion writes "Helps to make sure everything runs smoothly and reliably". Icinga is most compared with Zabbix, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and Centreon, whereas Nagios Fusion is most compared with Nagios XI. See our Icinga vs. Nagios Fusion report.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.