Ionic vs Temenos Quantum comparison

Ionic and Temenos are both solutions in the Mobile Development Platforms category. Ionic is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while Temenos is ranked #8. Ionic holds a 5.5% mindshare in MDP, compared to Temenos’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ionic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Temenos users who would recommend it.

Ionic

Read 14 Ionic reviews

691 Views
629 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Temenos Quantum

Read 15 Temenos Quantum reviews

1,323 Views
529 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Ionic

Temenos Quantum

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Temenos Quantum and Ionic compete in mobile application development. Ionic has the upper hand with its broader feature set, even though Temenos Quantum offers appealing pricing and support.

Features: Temenos Quantum provides pre-configured banking processes, strong security protocols tailored for financial institutions, and user-friendliness that aids customization. Ionic offers a rich library of native and web components, a hybrid development framework allowing code reuse across platforms, and Capacitor for native phone features access.

Room for Improvement: Temenos Quantum could improve in reducing the complexity of its implementation process, enhancing user engagement features for industries beyond banking, and simplifying integrations with non-financial APIs. Ionic could enhance support for complex automation tasks, increase performance in demanding applications, and offer more industry-specific customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Temenos Quantum's deployment model is specialized with robust support for financial apps, offering dedicated customer service. Ionic’s open-source foundation allows straightforward deployment with strong community support and comprehensive documentation, supporting self-service resources extensively.

Pricing and ROI: Temenos Quantum’s competitive pricing targets financial sectors, promising significant ROI in these industries. Ionic, with its lower setup costs and open-source flexibility, offers substantial long-term savings, appealing to businesses needing scalable solutions with a higher potential ROI across multiple industries.

To learn more, read our detailed Ionic vs. Temenos Quantum Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ionic vs. Temenos Quantum

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ionic

Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Temenos Quantum

Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms

8th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Platforms (5th), Rapid Application Development Software (31st), Low-Code Development Platforms (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Mobile Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Ionic is 5.5%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 7.4%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ionic	5.5%
Temenos Quantum	7.4%
Other	87.1%

Mobile Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Dansteve Adekanbi

Senior Frontend Developer Consultant at Modus Create

Great user acceptance and reliability, multiple teams not required, with prompt customer service

As a developer, I would say one of the improvements is more plugins. More plugins give you the ability to do more interactions with the framework over the library. As a user, I would say more flexibility in terms of look and feel. So far Ionic is very fluid. You might not really know, it is web-based technology. I know recently it has gone through a lot of updates, but it can also be improved and become stronger. Ionic allows you to get the best customization ever, but there is nothing like having more. The more customization you get, the easier it is for you to be able to build more quality apps.

Read full review

Zain Omer

Software Engineer (Kony-Temenos | Android) at Xpert Digital

Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability

There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ionic's best feature is that it's not necessary to write your own custom codes as all the hybrid is provided by Angular."

"It's very flexible for UI development."

"The most valuable feature is the one code deployed to all solutions, which means you do not need to have multiple teams."

"What I like the most about Ionic is live reloading, which enables us to develop new features without having to build the application again and re-check the functionality."

"The solution is secure, reliable, and packed with features so we can easily implement apps even in the most complex situations."

"Ionic is easy to upgrade and is helpful for design purposes. It also is quite common and easy to use. It is a very reliable application. It's easy to write on and print. The UI is easy to use as well. My organization chose to go with Ionic because we can access both Android and iOS applications."

"Being able to have one set of code is valuable. I don't have to recode for different platforms. I don't have to recode for Xcode, Angular, or Android. So, the biggest feature for me is that it's a hybrid system, and I can have one set of code, and then the tool sets that are in there convert my code for Xcode or Play Store. It makes work a lot easier."

"With the Capacitor feature, you have access to the native attributes of your phone such as your camera. This makes work a lot easier."

More Ionic pros

"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."

"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."

"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."

"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."

"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."

"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."

"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."

More Temenos Quantum pros

Cons

"The navigation within this solution could be improved; it is currently quite complicated to move through the different tabs."

"The documentation could be improved."

"As a developer, I would say one of the improvements is more plugins."

"There could be better support for augmented reality and other things. Geolocation and background app activity are some of the things that are a little more clumsy at the moment and could be improved."

"In a future release, we would like to have a little more support for the desktop environment. Currently it is still focused on mobile devices."

"Ionic's UI component doesn't always look like the native mobile app."

"It would be better if it had a speed niche system. There are a lot of things we need that weren't in the latest version. But I think they will be adding something."

"They started writing Capacitor to get rid of PhoneGap and Cordova, but they haven't yet got all the libraries and all the functionalities. They want you to start using Capacitor, but they don't have all the libraries there. They're developing them as they go. So, currently, you have to mix and match the three. When it comes to mobile applications, I would only like to use Capacitor. I don't want to jump between Cordova and Capacitor or have both of them. That's the main thing for me, but they have been working on it."

More Ionic cons

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."

"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."

"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."

"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."

"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."

More Temenos Quantum cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think most of the plugins for Ionic are open source, and you can do a lot with many of the basic features. However, if you need to use a premium plugin for something like extra scroll list functionality, Ionic will ask for a certain sum of money."

"Ionic is an open-source solution, it is free."

"We pay 50,000 dinars per month."

"You don't have to pay anything except for certain projects. For example, Appflow has some costs related to it but you don't have to use it. You can also pay for extra support."

"Ionic is an open source solution, and there are no hidden fees."

"You can use the free version, but if you still want to buy it, the price starts from $499/month."

"The starting cost for the enterprise option is around one hundred dollars per month."

"The solution's open source option is free with no licensing fees."

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"It is expensive solution."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it"

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

18%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

University

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Comparisons

OutSystems vs Ionic

Compared 18% of the time

IBM MobileFirst vs Ionic

Compared 14% of the time

Xamarin Platform vs Ionic

Compared 14% of the time

Mendix vs Ionic

Compared 13% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Ionic

Compared 11% of the time

More Ionic Competitors

Appzillon Digital Platform vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 34% of the time

Apple iOS SDK vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

Jitterbit Vinyl vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

Pega Platform vs Temenos Quantum

Compared 6% of the time

More Temenos Quantum Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ionic

January 2026

Download Ionic product report

Buyer's Guide

Temenos Quantum

January 2026

Download Temenos Quantum product report

Also Known As

No data available

KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum

Overview

Ionic is an open-source UI toolkit for developing high-quality mobile and desktop apps with web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Ionic focuses on the frontend UX and UI interaction of an app – UI controls, interactions, gestures, and animations. It is simple to learn and can be used without any frontend framework by utilizing a simple script inclusion.

While previous versions of Ionic were strongly connected to Angular, version 4.x of the framework was re-engineered to serve as an independent Web Component library, with integrations for the newest JavaScript frameworks, such as Angular. Ionic works well in most frontend frameworks, including React and Vue, however some frontend frameworks require a shim to enable full Web Component support.

The official Ionic CLI, or Command Line Interface, is a tool that enables developers to easily construct Ionic apps and offers a number of useful commands. The CLI installs and updates Ionic and also includes a built-in development server, build and debugging tools, and much more. If you are an Appflow member, you may manage your account and carry out cloud builds and deployments via the CLI.

Ionic Features

Ionic has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

One codebase: Ionic is the first mobile app stack that allows web developers to use a single codebase to create apps for all major app stores and the mobile web. Ionic apps look and feel natural on every device thanks to Adaptive Styling.
High performance: Ionic is designed to run and behave well on the latest mobile devices, using best practices such as efficient hardware accelerated transitions and touch-optimized gestures.
Simple, clean design: Ionic is built to function and display well across all popular mobile platforms and devices. You'll be building in style thanks to pre-made components, typography, and an attractive (but flexible) base theme that adjusts to each platform.
Native and web-friendly: Ionic uses native SDKs and emulates native app UI guidelines to combine native app device features and UI standards with the full flexibility and power of the open web. Ionic operates as a Progressive Web App in the browser or deploys natively via Capacitor (or Cordova).

Ionic Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Ionic. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Cross-platform: Create and distribute apps with a single code base. Apps run natively on iOS, Android, desktop, and the web as Progressive Web Apps. Publish once and go anywhere.

Based on web standards: Ionic is developed using cutting-edge web APIs like Custom Elements and Shadow DOM on top of reliable, industry-standard web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Ionic components have a solid API as a result, and they aren't subject to the whims of a single platform vendor.

Good design: Ionic is made to operate and look great right out of the box across all platforms. Start with typography, interactive paradigms, pre-designed elements, and an attractive (yet extensible) base theme.

Simplicity: Ionic was created with simplicity in mind, making it fun, simple to learn, and available to almost anyone with basic web development skills.

Ionic

Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.

Temenos

Sample Customers

MRA, Napa Group, Sworkit, Airbus, Sense Corp, Interactive Gaming Company, Pacifica, Untapp'd, Diesel, National Museum of African American History and Culture

Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank

Buyer's Guide

Ionic vs. Temenos Quantum

December 2025

Free Report: Ionic vs. Temenos Quantum

Find out what your peers are saying about Ionic vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ionic vs. Temenos Quantum report.

See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.