Appzillon Digital Platform vs Temenos Quantum comparison

"Omni-channel banking is valuable."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."

"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."

"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."

"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms.​"

"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."

"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."

"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."

"Development ease should be improved. It should be easier for developers."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."

"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"

"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."

"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."

"It is an on-prem solution. It comes at a one-time cost, and then there is probably a yearly subscription."

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."

"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"

"It is expensive solution."

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."