Intercept X Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams comparison

Sophos and Malwarebytes are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Sophos is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.4, while Malwarebytes is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.5. Sophos holds a 1.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Malwarebytes’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Sophos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Malwarebytes users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Malwarebytes Teams and Intercept X Endpoint are competitors in the endpoint protection category. Intercept X Endpoint has the upper hand in advanced machine learning features, while Malwarebytes excels in user-friendly setup and cloud management.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams is appreciated for its ease of use, effective threat detection capacities, and straightforward cloud management. Intercept X Endpoint offers advanced machine learning, deep learning capabilities, and centralized management, enhancing threat analysis and response.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams could improve its user interface to reduce false positives and enhance reporting functions. It also needs better AI integration and platform compatibility. Intercept X Endpoint can enhance processing efficiency and integration with third-party tools, as users report high resource consumption during scans and a complex interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer flexible deployment options. Malwarebytes Teams is easier to deploy with accessible customer service, while Intercept X Endpoint might require more technical support for complex environments. Overall user satisfaction with customer support is reported for both products.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams offers competitive pricing, though perceived as expensive in some regions. It provides value through ease of use and effective protection. Intercept X Endpoint, with a premium price, is justified by advanced features and accessibility compared to alternatives. Both products offer strong ROI, preventing costly breaches, with perceptions of value depending on business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Intercept X Endpoint is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.9%
Intercept X Endpoint	1.8%
Malwarebytes Teams	1.6%
Other	92.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Abhijit Mukherji

IT Head at Dee Development

Has struggled to detect major threats but has offered basic protection over time

Intercept X Endpoint could learn from CrowdStrike in terms of overall performance and filtering because performance is most important, especially these days as Windows is getting buggier and buggier, which puts a huge load on the PC, and even with the most advanced CPUs and everything in place, it still lags in performance in so many places, thanks to Windows' clumsy design of these collaboration suites that make it extremely heavy on PC's resources. The interface of Intercept X Endpoint is quite old-fashioned. The Sophos interfaces, including for Intercept X Endpoint, are quite bad actually; to be very honest, even in UTM boxes, they are not great at all. You can hardly see a very small portion of windows while it's creating the firewall rules, and we have been complaining about this for quite some time, but there hasn't been any improvement on those grounds. Intercept X Endpoint's anti-ransomware capabilities failed us during a bad attack, and just because of our own backup policies, we could restore our normal operations; otherwise, if we had to depend on this solution, we would have been long dead because the infection was so bad, it couldn't even detect the infection. Intercept X Endpoint cannot handle zero-day attacks; in my experience, last year, we had this major issue with a malware attack, and it happened just because of our backup policies that we were able to recover without any support from Sophos, which just told us they would charge us some 1 Crore in rupees. Intercept X Endpoint should improve their implementation; things will never be perfect for the new world. This new world is always facing new kinds of attacks and new ways to compromise the system. They need to learn fast, implement fast, and sometimes redesigning the solution is the solution—not just patchwork. There was a time we used to love Sophos because of its fresh design and innovative thought. In my experience, when technical companies are led by MBA professionals, they lose their shine on the technical part and become more dependent on target sales; it turns into a marketing-centric operation that loses the technical focus completely.

Read full review

reviewer2594097

Chief Executive Officer at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees

Exceptional malware protection with regular updates and behavior-based detection

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have mentioned issues with false positives. It lacks enterprise-level management and more enterprise functionality. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are much more enterprise-grade solutions. Malwarebytes has limited integration with cybersecurity tools and lacks enterprise integrations because it is not an enterprise product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are a lot of lead solutions in this space, however, Palo Alto is number one."

"One thing that I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it is detecting all the suspicious or malicious binaries, and it has integration with Palo Alto Firewall."

"Automation and playbooks have helped me significantly, as Cortex Xnor's playbooks predefine the workflow of the automation, such as response processes, alert triggering, and enriching the context, efficiently detecting and blocking malicious attacks with firewalls while eliminating workload and speeding responses for next-generation operations."

"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is its machine-learning capabilities. Additionally, there is full integration with other solutions."

"I generally believe that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is probably the best in the market right now."

"The biggest positive impact I see from Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a significant reduction in the number of people required to manage it."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to other people."

"It has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable feature of Sophos Intercept X is cloud management."

"Sophos Intercept X is a good protection service package for small businesses and large corporations."

"The initial setup is straightforward, the installation is easy, and it's faster than SAP, with Sophos Intercept deployable in a couple of minutes, taking about one hour for a firewall and only 15 minutes for endpoint protection, needing just one engineer."

"The dashboard is user-friendly."

"My advice to others would be to use centralized management because it makes it much easier to implement, manage, track the installations, and the day-to-day usage."

"I find the security heartbeat feature with synchronized security very useful. It's a very nice feature that allows you to basically switch off an endpoint. When an endpoint has got a virus or something like that, or it's infected or compromised, you can isolate it from the network, but only if you've got an XG Firewall as well. It also provides ease of use. It is the only antivirus that can recognize 25 out of the 36 ransomware and virus techniques that have been often used in terms of the behavior base using heuristics. It's beautiful, utterly amazing. No other antivirus can do that."

"The stability on offer is fine."

"To this point-in-time, we have found that the technical support is very responsive, we can reach them by phone and by email, and we get answers to the issues and questions we bring up."

More Intercept X Endpoint pros

"From our experience, it provides 100% visibility and detects hundreds of infections."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the agents, user experience, efficiency of the findings, and MDR features."

"When it comes to frontend protections, it has some of the best definitions. In addition, they do traditional signature and heuristic detection a lot better than Microsoft and some other players in that space."

"The most valuable features of the solution are malware scanning and malware removal."

"I never have to look at it or do anything with it, and then my system just stays clean."

"This solution helps us by providing central management of anti-malware and anti-exploit functionality."

"I like the solution's ability to detect potentially unwanted programs. For some reason, it seems superior to other solutions, or at least in comparison to McAfee."

"The product keeps our company safe."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

Cons

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"The server sometimes stops continuously to check things so it would be helpful to receive access updates or technical reasons."

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files. It was unable to retrieve new file verdicts. It was using a thing called "local analysis" to determine if something was a malicious file or not. There was no dynamic analysis."

"The MAC agent is not as robust feature-wise as the PC version."

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

"The solution should enhance the ADR and reporting."

"The solution needs better reports. I think they should let the customer go in and customize the reports."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Through Sophos Central I would like to see the ability to zero in and produce a report about the challenges being faced by a particular machine and user, to know if a virus is appearing only on that specific machine or also on others."

"We've had difficulty with uninstalling the solution. When we try to uninstall an old version of the basic Sophos Antivirus, it doesn't seem to uninstall completely."

"The price of this product should be reduced because it is a little high."

"While Sophos is helpful technically, their tech support is not so good."

"It's a challenge to do system maintenance work on a notebook. You always have to disable Sophos first."

"Intercept X Endpoint's anti-ransomware capabilities failed us during a bad attack, and just because of our own backup policies, we could restore our normal operations; otherwise, if we had to depend on this solution, we would have been long dead because the infection was so bad, it couldn't even detect the infection."

"Pricing is high."

"The after sales service and support could be improved, particularly on the technical side."

More Intercept X Endpoint cons

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

"The stability and performance of the solution are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"This solution reports far too many false positives!"

"Even though we're satisfied with the product, we don't like the bait-and-switch pricing style."

"The product has major problems in almost every facet of setup and use including setup, configuration, lack of functionality, lack of stability, false positives, questionable reporting, inability to protect from randsomeware and poor technical support and development."

"There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity."

"We had a little performance problem with the solution, but that's been resolved. Since then, it's been running well."

"My clients have frequently encountered some tech support scams where when you go to a particular website, it throws up a fake warning to you and states that you need to call this number."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price was fine."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"Very costly product."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"You can purchase a license for one to three years."

"The solution is not expensive."

"There is a license required to use this solution."

"Compared to other solutions, such as CrowdStrike, we are most certainly happy with its pricing. We did a three year-business deal."

"We were able to eliminate the ransomware using the one-month, full-featured trial license."

"Licensing fees are paid monthly."

"We have an annual subscription."

"There is a yearly payment to be made. For each client, it costs around 15 dollars. There are no additional costs besides the licensing price we pay to use the solution."

More Intercept X Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"It is expensive."

"The platform pricing is competitive with other antivirus products."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	76
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

How does Crodwstrike Falcon compare with Sophos Intercept X?

I like that Crowdstrike Falcon allows me to easily correlate data between my firewalls. Its detection and machine lea...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Intercept X?

Intercept X Endpoint has some impact on the budget. It is quite costly when measuring Intercept X Endpoint's protecti...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Intercept X?

Intercept X Endpoint can be improved in several ways. Currently, it is only available on the cloud, and having it ava...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Malwarebytes?

My primary use case is that it's protecting me against malware.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Intercept X Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Intercept X Endpoint Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Intercept X Endpoint

July 2026

Download Intercept X Endpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

July 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Sophos Intercept X

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Intercept X Endpoint is known for its advanced threat detection, user-friendly interface, and centralized management, alongside powerful cloud-based capabilities that enhance security using AI and machine learning.

Intercept X Endpoint strengthens security posture through AI and machine learning, effectively countering unknown threats. It includes ransomware protection, server lockdown, application control, and synchronized security with Sophos Firewall. Appreciated for preventing data leaks, it ensures superior malware and web filtering, while offering a robust EDR component for managed detection. Highlighted for its scalability and cost-effectiveness, it serves well in endpoint protection, covering antivirus, ransomware, malware, and DLP services across PCs, servers, and mobile devices.

What are the key features of Intercept X Endpoint?

Threat Detection: Utilizes AI for advanced threat detection.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies centralized management.
Cloud-Based Capabilities: Enhances security operations and scalability.
Ransomware Protection: Guards against data encryption threats.
Server Lockdown: Restricts unauthorized server access.
Application Control: Manages application usage securely.
Synchronized Security: Integrates with Sophos Firewall for comprehensive security.

What benefits should be sought in reviews?

Effective Threat Management: Protects against emerging cyber threats.
Scalability: Caters to growing organizational demands smoothly.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides competitive pricing for advanced features.
Advanced AI Applications: Leverages AI for superior threat mitigation.
Comprehensive Endpoint Coverage: Extends protection across multiple device types.

Intercept X Endpoint finds usage across industries by protecting endpoints against cyber threats. Deployable through Sophos Central for remote management, it suits entities lacking extensive security expertise. AI algorithms deliver advanced threat protection, making it a smart choice for organizations across different sectors. Aligning with varied technological environments enhances its acceptability, while integration with existing systems is supported.

Sophos

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Flexible Systems

Knutson Construction

Buyer's Guide

Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams

June 2026

Free Report: Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams

Find out what your peers are saying about Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Intercept X Endpoint vs. Malwarebytes Teams report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.