InfoVista VistaInsight vs Statseeker comparison

InfoVista and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. InfoVista is ranked #96, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. InfoVista holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfoVista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

InfoVista VistaInsight

Read 2 InfoVista VistaInsight reviews

223 Views
140 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

416 Views
252 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

InfoVista VistaInsight

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfoVista VistaInsight and Statseeker are products in the network management domain. InfoVista gains an edge with its advanced analytics, but Statseeker's simplicity and speed often make it the preferred choice for many users.

Features: InfoVista VistaInsight provides advanced analytics offering deep insights, predictive analysis, and detailed reporting of network performance. Statseeker is strong in real-time monitoring, lightning-fast speed, and efficient detection of network issues.

Room for Improvement: InfoVista could improve user interface intuitiveness, streamline deployment for diverse environments, and enhance real-time capabilities. Statseeker could expand its analytics capabilities, offer more comprehensive reporting, and increase adaptability for complex network scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfoVista VistaInsight utilizes a flexible deployment model suitable for various infrastructures, supported by robust customer service ensuring satisfaction. Statseeker is designed for straightforward deployment, enabling rapid setup with minimal downtime, backed by responsive customer support for quick issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: InfoVista VistaInsight, though involving higher initial costs, offers strong ROI with its comprehensive features and predictive analytics, appealing to organizations in need of in-depth insights. Statseeker, with its lower setup cost, provides quick ROI due to efficient monitoring and simplicity, attracting buyers seeking cost-effective solutions with essential network management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfoVista VistaInsight

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

96th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfoVista VistaInsight is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Tariq Nasim

User at Mobily

An excellent product with an expensive license

The product is excellent. However, the license is expensive.

Read full review

Jessie Hackney

Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education

Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise

The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My experience with technical support has been perfect."

"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"The solution reduces the complexity of our network monitoring because it can make my engineers do their jobs faster. The solution also reduces troubleshooting time for network administrators to pinpoint issues quicker."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The presentation of the features can be improved. It can be more user-friendly for the visual part of the portal and to allow the customer to be able to use."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is expensive."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 100% of the time

More InfoVista VistaInsight Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 54% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 46% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download InfoVista VistaInsight product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

April 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

VistaInsight

No data available

Overview

InfoVista VistaInsight is a pre-built service assurance solution that provides the benefits of off-the-shelf software, while enabling rapid configuration and tailoring to meet the unique needs of communications service providers (CSPs) and sophisticated large enterprises. Built upon InfoVista's scale-as-you-grow, distributed collection and reporting, organizations are empowered to monitor the performance of their data center infrastructure, network layers and domains, and physical and virtual components. VistaInsight delivers usage and forecasting to engineering, enables service exception alerts for operations, and manages and demonstrates SLAs for both internal stakeholders and end customers all through a web-based portal.

InfoVista

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Ooredoo Tunisia

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.