InfoScale vs MetaDefender Storage Security comparison

InfoScale and OPSWAT are both solutions in the Data Storage for Kubernetes category. InfoScale is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while OPSWAT is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. InfoScale holds a 8.8% mindshare in DSfK, compared to OPSWAT’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfoScale users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OPSWAT users who would recommend it.

InfoScale

Read 9 InfoScale reviews

1,804 Views
253 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MetaDefender Storage Security

Read 3 MetaDefender Storage Security reviews

1,995 Views
100 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfoScale

MetaDefender Storage Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

MetaDefender Storage Security and InfoScale compete in data security and integrity enhancement for enterprise environments. MetaDefender holds an advantage in ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, while InfoScale’s robust features justify its higher price for businesses needing advanced capabilities.

Features: MetaDefender Storage Security includes malware detection, incident response, and proactive data protection. InfoScale offers scalability, advanced data replication, and disaster recovery capabilities, making it appealing for enterprises with complex needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MetaDefender Storage Security is characterized by a user-friendly deployment process, facilitating faster implementation. InfoScale, while having a more complex setup due to advanced capabilities, provides extensive customer support to assist in deployment, ensuring customers can utilize its full potential.

Pricing and ROI: MetaDefender Storage Security is attractive for its competitive pricing, offering a quicker return on investment. InfoScale, despite a higher initial cost, delivers significant value with its advanced features, benefiting organizations in the long term. MetaDefender suits budget-conscious buyers, while InfoScale attracts those seeking comprehensive functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed InfoScale vs. MetaDefender Storage Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. MetaDefender Storage Security

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfoScale

Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), High Availability Clustering (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Autonomous Operational Resilience (4th)

MetaDefender Storage Security

Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Storage Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Storage for Kubernetes category, the mindshare of InfoScale is 8.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MetaDefender Storage Security is 2.7%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Storage for Kubernetes Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfoScale	8.8%
MetaDefender Storage Security	2.7%
Other	88.5%

Data Storage for Kubernetes

Featured Reviews

TABISH JAVED

Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India

Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover

Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Read full review

Lhami Bilici

Cyber Security Engineer at NSC BİLİŞİM HİZMETLERİ TİC LTD ŞTİ

Layered security has protected sensitive data and supports compliance across storage environments

There are always areas for improvement for MetaDefender Storage Security. One common challenge is the performance impact, especially when dealing with large volumes of data. Some users have reported that the scanning process can occasionally slow down storage access times, particularly in high-traffic environments. Another area for improvement is the complexity of configuration. Some users find that fine-tuning the policies and integrating it with existing infrastructure can sometimes be a bit complex and time-consuming. Additionally, while the multi-scanning feature is a huge plus, it can sometimes lead to compatibility issues with certain file types or custom applications. Ongoing updates and ensuring compatibility is key. Finally, user feedback sometimes points to the need for more streamlined reporting dashboards, making it easier to quickly identify and address potential threats. Overall, these are relatively minor challenges compared to the benefits, but they do provide areas for future enhancements. One area that could be enhanced in MetaDefender Storage Security is even more streamlined integration with a wider range of third-party security tools and SIEM platforms. That would help create a more unified security ecosystem. Another improvement could be more advanced machine learning capabilities to detect zero-day threats and sophisticated malware patterns, making the detection even more proactive. Improving the user interface and making the reporting dashboards even more intuitive could help security teams get quicker insights and take action faster. Additionally, better scalability and performance optimizations for very large data environments would be great, ensuring that performance remains smooth even as data volumes grow. Overall, these enhancements would just make it even more robust and user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature is that it supports high availability and automatic failover, which minimizes downtime and helps the environment reduce downtime and improve high availability for critical applications."

"Over the last two years, we did not experience any application failover or receive alerts due to the immediate switchover mechanism in active-active mode that ensures no downtime, helping us significantly with confidence and trust in our organization."

"It's a stable solution."

"In a live incident scenario, the data replication process occurs in real-time, and compared to other products, this data replication feature works effectively, ensuring data availability, and we can implement this scenario using Veritas Volume Replication (VVR), which is the most usable feature in InfoScale for data replication."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"InfoScale's ability to maintain data integrity and availability during a cyber event such as a ransomware attack is excellent."

"InfoScale does that all by itself without any dependency on different solutions."

"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."

More InfoScale pros

"MetaDefender Storage Security offers robust protection for storage infrastructure, data safety, and compliance, integrating seamlessly to safeguard against threats, making it an excellent choice for businesses handling sensitive information."

"Implementing MetaDefender Storage Security has definitely reduced incidents like malware attacks and data loss incidents."

"Overall, any industry dealing with sensitive or regulated data can benefit from the robust multi-layer protection that MetaDefender Storage Security promotes."

Cons

"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."

"Many customers can see the benefits of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to buy the products and solutions because of the licensing costs."

"It could be more stable and more secure."

"It's very difficult to implement."

"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."

"Many customers can see the benefit of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to purchase the product because the license cost is very high."

"While InfoScale is mainly used by enterprise-level customers, it does not inherently support many applications, which presents a scalability issue."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."

More InfoScale cons

"Improvements that could be made to MetaDefender Storage Security, based on feedback from technical staff, include better daily malware signature updates for automatic current malware signature updates and an improved integration process across complex infrastructures."

"One of the most frequently seen common challenges organizations face when implementing MetaDefender Storage Security is that the integration process into the existing infrastructure is complex."

"I wish to see a daily malware signature update feature in the future for MetaDefender Storage Security that updates the current malware signatures automatically."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Storage for Kubernetes solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Media Company

Construction Company

49%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?

InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MetaDefender Storage Security?

In terms of pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I believe the pricing is fair for an enterprise product, with good deployment options, customization, and free trials available. With our channel par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with MetaDefender Storage Security?

Improvements that could be made to MetaDefender Storage Security, based on feedback from technical staff, include better daily malware signature updates for automatic current malware signature upda...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MetaDefender Storage Security?

My main use case for MetaDefender Storage Security is selling it every day through our partners, who then take it to their customers, and I am also on end-user calls, speaking about OPSWAT and Meta...

See all answers

Comparisons

Windows Server Failover Clustering vs InfoScale

Compared 13% of the time

Portworx Enterprise vs InfoScale

Compared 11% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Platform Computing LSF vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs InfoScale

Compared 9% of the time

More InfoScale Competitors

ignio AIOps Platform vs MetaDefender Storage Security

Compared 100% of the time

More MetaDefender Storage Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale

August 2026

Download InfoScale product report

Buyer's Guide

MetaDefender Storage Security

August 2026

Download MetaDefender Storage Security product report

Also Known As

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes

No data available

Overview

InfoScale delivers robust data availability and protection for enterprises by managing critical workloads across hybrid cloud environments, ensuring minimal downtime and seamless performance.

InfoScale is designed to enhance data resilience and operational efficiency. By enabling quick data access across hybrid infrastructures, it reduces potential downtime and enhances business continuity. Its scalable architecture adapts to dynamic workloads, providing reliable performance under pressure while maintaining seamless integration with cloud-based solutions.

What are the key features of InfoScale?

Data Resiliency: Ensures continuous data availability through advanced clustering and replication technologies.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Offers seamless transition and operation within cloud environments.
Automated Operations: Streamlines management processes with automation to reduce manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Uptime: Improved reliability translates to reduced business interruption.
Cost Efficiency: Potentially lowers operational costs through optimized resource allocation.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection measures for critical data assets.
Operational Agility: Facilitates swift adaptation to evolving business requirements.

InfoScale is particularly effective in sectors such as healthcare and finance where data integrity and uptime are crucial. Its implementation empowers industries to handle data-intensive operations efficiently, ensuring continuity and compliance with industry standards.

InfoScale

MetaDefender Storage Security provides robust protection for storage infrastructure, ensuring data safety and compliance. It integrates seamlessly to safeguard against threats, offering peace of mind for businesses handling sensitive information.

Designed for modern businesses, MetaDefender Storage Security features advanced threat detection and data sanitization, ensuring that all uploaded files are thoroughly scanned for malware. It maintains high standards for data protection and regulatory compliance, making it a trusted choice for enterprises seeking comprehensive security measures. With flexible deployment options, it adapts to diverse environments, offering enhanced protection without compromising performance.

What are the key features of MetaDefender Storage Security?

Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates malware threats with precision.
Data Sanitization: Ensures files are safe by stripping away potentially harmful elements.
Regulatory Compliance: Aids in adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Flexible Deployment: Adapts to different operational environments seamlessly.

What benefits and ROI might users find in reviews of MetaDefender Storage Security?

Enhanced Security: Users often highlight improved safety and reduced threats.
Efficiency Gains: Automation and streamlined processes save time and resources.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reviews note the reduction in security breaches saving potential costs.
Compliance Assurance: Many users recognize the ease of maintaining regulatory standards.

MetaDefender Storage Security is implemented successfully across several industries, including finance and healthcare, where data protection is crucial. Its application in finance ensures that client data remains secure against potential threats, while in healthcare, it assists in maintaining patient confidentiality. The versatile implementation options enable industry-specific solutions, helping businesses to meet unique challenges in data handling and security requirements.

OPSWAT

Sample Customers

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. MetaDefender Storage Security

June 2026

Free Report: InfoScale vs. MetaDefender Storage Security

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale vs. MetaDefender Storage Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfoScale vs. MetaDefender Storage Security report.

See our list of best Data Storage for Kubernetes vendors.

We monitor all Data Storage for Kubernetes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.