InfluxDB vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

InfluxData and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. InfluxData is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.1, while OpenText is ranked #59 with an average rating of 8.0. InfluxData holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

8,219 Views
2,384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

2,244 Views
1,683 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfluxDB and OpenText Network Operations Management are competing in the data management sector. InfluxDB has an edge in flexibility and integration capabilities, while OpenText excels in comprehensive network management features for extensive environments.

Features: InfluxDB specializes in handling time-series data with high-performance monitoring and analytics. It integrates seamlessly with various platforms, catering to diverse data environments, and offers flexible cloud and on-premise options. OpenText Network Operations Management provides robust network visibility and automation, extensive management features tailored for enterprise-level operations, and a comprehensive deployment solution for large networks.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could enhance its interface for less technical users, expand its pre-built integrations, and improve documentation for complex deployments. OpenText might address the need for simpler initial setup, lower the expertise barrier for new users, and offer more flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfluxDB provides a straightforward deployment model supported by a broad community, offering various resources for cloud and on-premise implementations. OpenText Network Operations Management, while optimized for large-scale networks, may involve a complex setup, relying more on its structured customer service to support enterprise installations.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB offers more accessible initial costs with scalable pricing, making it appealing for cost-effective solutions focused on time-series data management. OpenText Network Operations Management typically involves higher upfront costs justified by its robust features for significant network operations, promising substantial ROI for enterprises emphasizing network management efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (12th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

59th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.5%
OpenText Network Operations Management	0.4%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I recommend going with the cloud version of InfluxDB, as it's very cheap and effective."

"The platform operates very quickly. It is easy to configure, connect, and query and integrates seamlessly with Grafana."

"This product has been working well and it is serving our purpose, so I can recommend it to others."

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

"InfluxDB positively impacts my organization because I have optimized my database storage, and by using powerful queries, I am able to find my data logs efficiently and also manage logging."

"InfluxDB has positively impacted Energy Box by being the best choice for our needs."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

More InfluxDB pros

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

Cons

"In terms of features that I would like to see or have, in the community version, some features are not available. I would like to have clustering and authentication in the community version."

"Sometimes, when we write too much data within a minute, the data count becomes excessive, reaching perhaps 100,000 or 500,000 data points, and InfluxDB gives a timeout exception, which we must handle in our application."

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"InfluxDB can be improved by addressing issues such as performance drops, queries being more difficult to understand, and its high memory usage."

"If it gets a little bit more into the metric side, then it would really be great, similar to Prometheus."

"I chose an 8 out of 10 because there is room for improvement, such as regarding backups and enhanced security through other types of authentication or encrypted data in TLS."

"However, I cannot ignore the challenges I faced while configuring the database with my message brokers, whether Rabbit or Kafka, because the documentation is not properly provided."

More InfluxDB cons

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

"It may need a more customizable UI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

23%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

FireMon Asset Manager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

September 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

September 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

OpenText Network Operations Management offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed for efficient network operations and management. It helps organizations streamline their network processes, ensuring enhanced performance and reliability in complex IT environments.

The platform is robust, providing capabilities that align with industry needs for automation and integration. Its powerful analytics and monitoring features enable IT teams to effectively manage network performance, detect anomalies, and ensure uptime. OpenText Network Operations Management supports scalable IT infrastructures, ensuring reliable operations in both cloud and on-premises settings.

What are the key features of OpenText Network Operations Management?

Scalable Monitoring: Provides continuous visibility into network performance across all environments.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks through automated workflows and alerts.
Incident Management: Enables rapid detection and resolution of network issues.
Analytics: Offers insights through advanced analytics tools to optimize operations.

What benefits or ROI can be expected from OpenText Network Operations Management?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlined processes and automation lead to higher productivity.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes downtime and reduces maintenance costs.
Improved Reliability: Enhances network uptime and performance.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.

OpenText Network Operations Management is utilized in sectors like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where reliable network performance is crucial. It supports critical operations by ensuring seamless integration and effective management of network resources in these industries.

OpenText

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

September 2026

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.