Inflectra Rapise vs Tungsten TotalAgility comparison

Inflectra and Tungsten Automation are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Inflectra is ranked #32 with an average rating of 4.0, while Tungsten Automation is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Inflectra holds a 0.6% mindshare in RPA, compared to Tungsten Automation’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

864 Views
389 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Tungsten TotalAgility

Read 23 Tungsten TotalAgility reviews

2,162 Views
778 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Tungsten TotalAgility

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Tungsten TotalAgility and Inflectra Rapise compete in the business automation platform category. Tungsten TotalAgility appears to have an advantage in agility features, while Inflectra Rapise is stronger in testing and automation capabilities, offering a cost-effective solution for specialized needs.

Features: Tungsten TotalAgility includes seamless workflow automation, efficient task management, and advanced analytics. Inflectra Rapise is known for intuitive test management, robust automated testing capabilities, and integration flexibility, focusing on testing automation.

Room for Improvement: Tungsten TotalAgility could improve by enhancing its testing capabilities, reducing complexity in initial setup, and offering better integration with non-Kofax platforms. Inflectra Rapise might benefit from expanding its process automation features, improving user interface for non-technical users, and enhancing cloud deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise offers a straightforward deployment model with comprehensive customer support. Tungsten TotalAgility provides customizable deployment with strong customer engagement. Inflectra is noted for simplicity and accessible support, while Tungsten offers deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Tungsten TotalAgility has higher setup costs with potential for significant ROI through increased process automation efficiencies. Inflectra Rapise presents a lower initial investment, providing cost-effective automation solutions for quicker ROI. Tungsten focuses on broader capabilities, whereas Inflectra emphasizes cost-efficient niche solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Tungsten TotalAgility Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Tungsten TotalAgility

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

32nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (20th), AI Quality Assurance (2nd)

Tungsten TotalAgility

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (5th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tungsten TotalAgility is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tungsten TotalAgility	0.9%
Inflectra Rapise	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Ross Macadam

Director at iicon ltd

Has faced challenges adapting to evolving capture methods and competitive integrations

It's difficult to say what I'd improve in Tungsten TotalAgility because we haven't been actively marketing that particular product in the last probably six to nine months. The speed of product development means that my experience with it is likely out of date in terms of the product suite capabilities. The difficulty with customers nowadays is that they are subject to the winds of change in terms of the adoption of cloud technologies and the offerings those cloud technologies bring. Microsoft, for instance, is rapidly filling in the spaces between various product areas that other vendors typically owned. That makes it difficult for customers to settle on their functional requirements because the offers are competing in the same space. I look for more integration with mainstream subscription based platforms, more security integration, and possibly some more lifecycle management features. However, the difficulty with that is the competition with existing options that people have in their subscription library.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"Kofax TotalAgility is a single package. They provide you with OCR capabilities, BPM capabilities, and case manager features."

"The product is really good, and it is easy to use. It comes with multiple integrations. The solution keeps up with the trend of Microsoft Copilot and AI."

"Kofax is very easy to use, UI-friendly and allows easy data extraction."

"Its integration capabilities are valuable. It has low code/no code features. You have to do minimal coding."

"It is user-friendly and has good documentation. It's good for developing communication and has a lot of the APIs needed for this purpose. There aren't a lot of software options available from this time period; this is the only one from 2013 that has this concept of microservices."

"It's not so complex to design what you need to."

"What I find most valuable in Kofax TotalAgility is its OCR feature. I also find its workflow and business process management capabilities valuable. Kofax TotalAgility also has good integration with other solutions and has an API call feature."

"The tool is low code which saves you from a developer."

More Tungsten TotalAgility pros

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The pricing for Kofax TotalAgility could be more attractive, particularly the cloud version of the solution which was offered to my company. This is its area for improvement."

"The one thing I would like to see more of right now: is a simplified form creation. That would be the most significant improvement I would like to see in their product."

"Kofax TotalAgility could improve the OTR engine. The page OTR engine is not accurate in predicting the data properly. If you provide many features which are good for business process management without an accurate OTR engine people will not want it."

"Room for improvement would be better OCR functionality in terms of Arabic OCR. There should be better accuracy."

"Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts."

"TotalAgility needs to improve communication with ECMs or other file storage systems because TotalAgility does not have file storage. A good improvement would be to create file storage or integrate with other file storage tools that are currently available."

"Kofax needs to improve the low-code or citizen developers."

"They provide sufficient but not excellent technical support. Perhaps there is a point where they could use some improvement."

More Tungsten TotalAgility cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"The licensing cost for Kofax TotalAgility is very expensive, though I'm unable to give you the range, the sales representatives of my company say that the product is quite expensive."

"Kofax TotalAgility is very expensive."

"It is slightly more expensive than other tools."

"It has a perpetual license. You pay once in a lifetime for the volume of scans you will do and the number of users you will have. You can have participants or regular users, and you can have developers and administrators. So, once you purchase it, it is for a lifetime, and then every year, you have to pay for the maintenance. There is an annual maintenance cost, which is about 18% of the licensing cost."

"The price of this solution is less than some of the competition."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

What do you like most about Kofax TotalAgility?

The product is really good, and it is easy to use. It comes with multiple integrations. The solution keeps up with the trend of Microsoft Copilot and AI.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax TotalAgility?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kofax TotalAgility?

I usually recommend Tungsten TotalAgility to any company with a business process that involves large scale capture of unstructured or semi-structured content across a range of processes that need t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 33% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 28% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 21% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 19% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

UiPath IXP vs Tungsten TotalAgility

Compared 18% of the time

ABBYY Vantage vs Tungsten TotalAgility

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Capture vs Tungsten TotalAgility

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten TotalAgility

Compared 8% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs Tungsten TotalAgility

Compared 8% of the time

More Tungsten TotalAgility Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten TotalAgility

January 2026

Download Tungsten TotalAgility product report

Also Known As

Rapise

Kofax TotalAgility, TotalAgility, Singularity IDP, Capture Enabled BPM

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Tungsten TotalAgility revolutionizes customer experience and organizational efficiency by integrating content-intensive workflow automation with advanced technologies like low-code process design and AI-driven intelligent document processing. Offering multiple deployment options including public cloud or preferred cloud service, TotalAgility empowers organizations to choose the solution that best fits their needs. With leading document intelligence, low-code automation, and end-to-end business process handling, TotalAgility ensures seamless workflow orchestration and task automation. Additionally, the platform delivers a frictionless development experience and a comprehensive single-vendor solution, eliminating the need for complex third-party arrangements. The recent unveiling of the TotalAgility-Azure OpenAI Connector further enhances the platform with cutting-edge Generative AI technology, enabling deep understanding, tailored responses, and diverse content creation. TotalAgility stands as the ultimate choice for unlocking innovation, maximizing workforce capacity, and improving customer engagement while ensuring governance, security, and agility for the future.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

AETNA, American Express, BNP Paribas, Citi, CommerzBank, Dexia, GoldmanSachs, HSBC, ING, JP Morgan, Raymond James

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Tungsten TotalAgility

December 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Tungsten TotalAgility

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Tungsten TotalAgility and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Tungsten TotalAgility report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.