Impulse Point SafeConnect vs Sophos Network Access Control comparison

Impulse Point and Sophos are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Impulse Point is ranked #16, while Sophos is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5. Impulse Point holds a 1.2% mindshare in NAC, compared to Sophos’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Impulse Point users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Sophos users who would recommend it.

Impulse Point SafeConnect

Read 1 Impulse Point SafeConnect review

305 Views
305 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 24 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,276 Views
1,238 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Impulse Point SafeConnect

Sophos Network Access Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Impulse Point SafeConnect and Sophos Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).

To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Impulse Point SafeConnect

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Impulse Point SafeConnect is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 2.3%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sophos Network Access Control	2.3%
Impulse Point SafeConnect	1.2%
Other	96.5%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Chong Dan

Director of Computer Information Services at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees

Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support

A lot of campuses use SafeConnect. It gives us good visibility and enforces policies. It helps enforce network security by scanning devices, making sure they have current and valid antivirus solutions with up-to-date antivirus definitions, and steers our end users by enforcing policy groups and steering them to the right access. Technical support is responsive. The stability is pretty good. It is very easy to scale the product.

Read full review

HirenPatel2

Manager at rspl

Have faced delays in support despite strong multi-layer policy configuration

I have observed some disadvantages as we have experienced one particular problem. We were facing an issue of synchronization of the endpoint with our firewall with help on a cloud for heartbeat syncing. However, it was not syncing as per our requirement. The user has to connect our firewall with the help of VPN. We were supposed to assume a solution on a cloud, which has good synchronization on a cloud with Sophos Central. It will sync with our firewall as well with the help of Sophos Central. Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control. We have to connect with VPN. We are expecting that if we have already installed an endpoint on our system and it is connected to the internet, then it must be synchronized on a cloud with Sophos Central. Through Sophos Central, it must connect with our firewall. If the endpoint is configured on Sophos Central and the firewall is also configured in Sophos Central, then there should be no need to connect to VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to scale the product."

"The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer."

"There is really good visibility for the appliance."

"We get full visibility into the network as a product, which is one of the key features of the product because recently they have acquired another product called Secure Wave, which is integrated into Sophos Network Access Control and provides advanced capabilities for managed detection and remediation, MDR, a major plus for customers."

"Sophos Network Access Control saves our clients time and money."

"The scalability of the system and the performance of the system and the solution's most valuable features."

"I found all Sophos Network Access Control features valuable, but IP blocking is the most useful."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Sophos' technical support is great, very fast and responsive, and they always know how to fix the problem."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

Cons

"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."

"Sophos Network Access Control requires a lot of resources to work, which is an area for improvement. Pricing could also be improved because it's costly."

"I would like more details on the incoming connection, like what is the download speed and how it fluctuates. If Sophos can give that information, it would be really good."

"The solution could offer more useful documentation."

"It would be beneficial to consider some improvements regarding the dashboard."

"Users are not controlled by role-based access; it's basically device-based control. The definition of role-based control is a little vague here because on the cloud level, it regulates access rather than tasks."

"I would like to be able to fully customize the reports."

"Sometimes we encounter intermediate-level support staff who use trial-and-error approaches, but sometimes we receive support from excellent staff members who resolve issues within seconds."

"I'd like to see them include direct integration with Active Directory."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For our tier group, for one year, the cost is probably around $10,000 for the license. If you do multi-year, you could get two years, and you could get it for about $8,000 per year. If you do three years, you get it around $7,000 a year."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"It is quite expensive."

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

Government

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

The pricing of Sophos Network Access Control is good, but it is somewhat high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

In my opinion, one feature that should be added is the ability to trace emails from individuals who change their IP address or send misbehaving emails from alternative networks. If someone sends a ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sophos Network Access Control?

Sophos Network Access Control serves primary use cases for both networking purposes and security purposes.

See all answers

Comparisons

Forescout Platform vs Impulse Point SafeConnect

Compared 28% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Impulse Point SafeConnect

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Impulse Point SafeConnect

Compared 18% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Impulse Point SafeConnect

Compared 17% of the time

macmon Network Access Control vs Impulse Point SafeConnect

Compared 15% of the time

More Impulse Point SafeConnect Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 13% of the time

Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 10% of the time

Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 9% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

February 2026

Download Impulse Point SafeConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

February 2026

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Also Known As

SafeConnect

No data available

Overview

SafeConnect provides the ability to automate the enforcement of security compliance and network access control policies (based on identity, device type, location, and ownership), and gathers a wealth of real-time and historical context-aware device data so you can make more informed and intelligent decisions.

Impulse Point

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sophos

Sample Customers

Aerohive Solution

Rushmoor Borough Council

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.