We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Sophos Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"ClearPass is effortless to use and configure. It's not hard to learn the tool, and it has lots of features."
"Aruba ClearPass's most valuable features are simple accessing, operating, and management. Additionally, the dashboard and performance work well."
"We are mainly using Aruba ClearPass for our clients for securing access to their on-premise assets. As per customer expectations, we are trying our best to track the complete user activity in the network. This is the main and the core feature we require."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba ClearPass is the ease of deployment and integration with other equipment in the network."
"Stable with good QBT technology."
"Aruba ClearPass has complete NAC features."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the GUI and its ease-to-do configuration. Additionally, we can troubleshoot many things in one window."
"A lot of the issues in Forescout are mitigated in Aruba ClearPass, it supports all the expected protocols."
"The installation is very straightforward."
"The pricing is very reasonable and you can negotiate on the price."
"Sophos' technical support is great, very fast and responsive, and they always know how to fix the problem."
"It is intuitive in the sense that I don't have to struggle with the configuration."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve when it comes to troubleshooting, it can be difficult. Some advanced problems are difficult."
"The initial setup was quite complex, it is not that easy."
"The GUI of Aruba ClearPass could improve, it is not user-friendly."
"We have had some issues with the installation of Aruba ClearPass."
"The technical support has some room for improvement. It takes them a long time to respond sometimes. I rate Aruba support six out of 10."
"Lacks the ability to handle more than one certificate for both the management process and the Captive Portal."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve the user interface, it is a bit chunky."
"I would like to see better integration with the firewall for zeroing out blacklisted users."
"In order to provide better management, it would be ideal with they offered better plugins for their firewall."
"I would say that anything that makes it easier to use and obtain statistics and metrics on any issue is always welcome. Anything that provides more information or insights into what is going on on the network would be beneficial."
"The interface on the cloud could be a bit better - just to give more performance on it."
"An area that could be improved is the information about licensing, which is fairly confusing at present."
More Sophos Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 22 reviews while Sophos Network Access Control is ranked 5th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 4 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Sophos Network Access Control is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Has an access tracker that's helpful when you want to troubleshoot authentication failures". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Network Access Control writes "Great security with a user-friendly interface and excellent stability". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and macmon Network Access Control, whereas Sophos Network Access Control is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), ExtremeControl and Ruckus Cloudpath. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Sophos Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
