"It is very easy to scale the product."
"The most important feature is that this solution is agentless. So, you don't have to install any agents on endpoints."
"It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance."
"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."
"There is an add-on feature for application control to kill unwanted applications when launched on a user's device."
"It's a stable product."
"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."
"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."
"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."
"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."
Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 10th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 1 review while Portnox CORE is ranked 7th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 5 reviews. Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Great dashboards, easy to set up, and very scalable". Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Aruba ClearPass and Portnox Clear.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
