Imperva Application Security Platform vs Windows Azure CDN comparison

Imperva and Microsoft are both solutions in the CDN category. Imperva is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. Imperva holds a 7.3% mindshare in CDN, compared to Microsoft’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Imperva users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Imperva Application Securit...

Read 147 Imperva Application Security Platform reviews

19,691 Views
6,104 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Windows Azure CDN

Read 13 Windows Azure CDN reviews

1,995 Views
1,995 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Imperva Application Securit...

Windows Azure CDN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Imperva Application Security Platform and Windows Azure CDN compete in the web security domain. Imperva holds a slight upper hand due to its extensive security features and customizability.

Features: Imperva provides excellent web threat protection, custom profiling, and DDoS defense, tailoring security for specific web applications. Its profiling and dynamic learning capabilities are its strengths. Windows Azure CDN offers integrated WAF, content optimization, and caching capabilities. Azure's strength is in its robust integration with Azure services.

Room for Improvement: Imperva needs better analytics depth and policy configuration flexibility. Improvements in bot protection and certificate management are necessary. Windows Azure CDN should enhance its pricing model and support response speed while simplifying domain and feature integration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva supports diverse environments like public, private, and hybrid clouds, but experiences with customer support vary. Windows Azure CDN is mainly used in public and hybrid cloud setups, with reliable customer service, though it can lag in localized high-tier support.

Pricing and ROI: Imperva is considered expensive yet delivers solid ROI through its extensive protection capabilities. Its complex licensing model may be cost-prohibitive for smaller businesses. Windows Azure CDN has variable pricing based on usage, perceived as high, but offers good value with its comprehensive features and Azure integration. ROI is substantial for businesses regularly targeted by web threats.

To learn more, read our detailed Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Windows Azure CDN Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Windows Azure CDN

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imperva Application Securit...

Ranking in CDN

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

147

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (1st), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (4th), Bot Management (1st), API Security (1st)

Windows Azure CDN

Ranking in CDN

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the CDN category, the mindshare of Imperva Application Security Platform is 7.3%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Azure CDN is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

CDN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Imperva Application Security Platform	7.3%
Windows Azure CDN	2.8%
Other	89.9%

CDN

Featured Reviews

reviewer2818155

Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Application protection has improved and reporting and dashboards still need refinement

I believe Imperva Application Security Platform should have a more interactive wizard. While the dashboard is good, it could be more eye-catching. Based on my perspective, I recommend modifying the dashboards, especially the main dashboard where I can see the traffic hit count, alerts, and other latest information. In terms of reporting, I find it challenging to create reports; in my earlier days, it was difficult. Over time, I have learned how to create reports, but it should be easier to do so. I have used other tools such as firewalls or SolarWinds, where creating a report is straightforward and does not take much time, unlike in Imperva, where I have to add many elements. Modifications in the integration aspects would also be beneficial.

Read full review

Anto Anish

Consultant at NatWest Group

Our data is cached faster and sites load faster

We use the solution for hosting static web applications. We use it to cache images or files We mostly distribute images through the CDN. Earlier, we were directly caching from the server to CDN. Since we started using the solution, there has been a significant improvement in the response time.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On the real time, you can see live traffic, which is flowing into our website."

"Technical support provides good, quick responses."

"There are some features that are configured by default, so even without doing much, it can still provide a level of protection."

"Compared to other web application firewalls in the market, Imperva does things in the most accurate way."

"There is a quick switch between any of the the nodes if something goes wrong, where there's a there's an attack against a specific area. The security setup is reasonably easy. It's not a problem to do setups and rules and integrations. And, yeah, just the the back end team is also very willing to insist if there's questions that that we cannot answer or with these questions that we do have"

"Hands down, the WAF is the most valuable feature; being able to identify, block, whitelist or blacklist as needed, are all valuable."

"I have had a positive experience with Imperva Web Application Firewall's tech support so far. They are knowledgeable and respond on time."

"Protection is the best solution since it has profile functionality."

More Imperva Application Security Platform pros

"One of the most valuable aspects is the capability to store extensive datasets and objects in the cloud, enabling their download through shared access signatures."

"The UI is very intuitive."

"I like that CDN offers a routing feature."

"The fact that it just delivers what it is supposed to do is its most valuable feature...The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of Windows Azure CDN is its effectiveness."

"I enjoy engaging in discussions with colleagues possessing unique expertise. I leverage the three platforms—Azure, Google, and AWS extensively. This allows me to offer diverse solutions to customers, commonly referred to as a multi-cloud approach."

"We use the product for faster content delivery with low latency."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that one can access Windows Azure CDN from anywhere."

More Windows Azure CDN pros

Cons

"There is nothing specific where the application firewall is falling short."

"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."

"It should be more user-friendly. Like other web solutions, it would be helpful to be able to easily do policy configuration and identification inside the application. Understanding the in-depth configuration of a policy is somewhat difficult for an engineer, and they can improve that."

"The interface seems a bit outdated and simplistic."

"No major improvements are required, but it should still work on reducing the false positives."

"The signature updates could be faster."

"I would say that technical support is average."

"They once terminated a free account without warning, resulting in a few days downtime."

More Imperva Application Security Platform cons

"There were a few bugs that were very disappointing. So, that is a part of the reason why we started using Fastly."

"I aim to enhance the reporting."

"The high price of Windows Azure CDN is an area of concern where improvements can be made."

"The response time of the support team must be improved."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Exploring shared access solutions with cloud accounts would be a beneficial choice."

"Azure is continuously improving its CDN but the documentation should be up-to-date."

"They should include configuration for cache rules."

More Windows Azure CDN cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"The cost is on par with other solutions such as Cloudflare and Akamai."

"Pricing could be more competitive."

"The cost of this solution depends on the platform."

"Imperva’s pricing is a bit higher in the market since it offers a full-blown WAF."

"It is very costly, but the return on investment is very high. Its cost was around $70,000, and we got it back in just six months."

"There is a license or subscription renewal that our customers pay."

"For enterprise contracts you will be in touch with a dedicated account manager who will guide you regarding licensing."

More Imperva Application Security Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is extremely high, almost 9 out of 10."

"It comes at a relatively affordable cost."

"The pricing of the solution depends on usage and varies based on the company's needs. If you want additional features like advanced logging, it will be pricier. However, it could be cheaper if you don't need those features. It all depends on the resources and requirements."

"I rate the price of Windows Azure CDN a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is high."

"The solution's price depends on how much traffic you have. So, it was okay for us. Payments are to be made on a monthly basis since one has to pay for what they used."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"The solution's price is above the medium range."

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

More Windows Azure CDN pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CDN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	88
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	70

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?

Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?

The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Imperva DDoS are reasonable for the amount of technical capabilities provided. I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Imperva DDoS?

I would like to see improvements in the pooling of threats and attacks, possibly to enlarge the scale of indicators of compromise. For example, the initiation of an attack on the endpoint level cou...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Azure CDN?

In terms of pricing for Windows Azure CDN and the whole Microsoft products, you cannot compare networking alone or compute alone; you need a full solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Windows Azure CDN?

It is not a weakness of Windows Azure CDN; rather, it is the fact that it is outside Saudi Arabia, leading to some regulation issues. For computing, they could make a flex engine similar to other p...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Windows Azure CDN?

We are using Windows Azure CDN, Azure AI capability for a translator, Azure Front Door for CDN, and from Microsoft's side, we are selling many Microsoft E5 licenses. We are using it for our client.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Akamai vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Link11 vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Fastly vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Imperva Application Security Platform Competitors

Akamai vs Windows Azure CDN

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon CloudFront vs Windows Azure CDN

Compared 17% of the time

Hive Streaming vs Windows Azure CDN

Compared 16% of the time

Uplynk vs Windows Azure CDN

Compared 14% of the time

More Windows Azure CDN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Application Security Platform

August 2026

Imperva Application Security Platform report

Download Imperva Application Security Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Windows Azure CDN

July 2026

Download Windows Azure CDN product report

Also Known As

Imperva Bot Management, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Imperva API Security

No data available

Overview

Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.

Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.

What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?

Correlated Attack Validation: Enhances threat assessment by linking related security events.
Threat Radar: Offers visibility into potential and ongoing threats.
Virtual Patching: Provides protection against vulnerabilities without immediate code changes.
IncapRules: Allows creation of custom security policies.
DDoS Protection: Defends against large-scale distributed denial-of-service attacks.
CDN Integration: Improves content delivery speed and reliability.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

User-Friendly Administration: Simplifies setup and ongoing management tasks.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation with existing infrastructure.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Shields digital assets from a wide range of threats.
Hands-On Support: Provides timely and effective customer service assistance.

Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.

Imperva

Windows Azure CDN provides enhanced global content delivery with fast data caching, intuitive configuration, and seamless Azure services integration. It optimizes performance by accelerating dynamic content and offering Points of Presence for effective caching.

Windows Azure CDN excels in delivering content with minimal latency, boasting global accessibility and efficient data caching. Seamlessly integrating with Azure's versatile services, it enhances application performance, addressing edge cases through geolocation access and an integrated Web Application Firewall for improved security. Users benefit from fast and reliable content distribution, optimizing application delivery while supporting a wide array of business needs. Despite its strengths, some users note the need for enhancements in pricing and support response times. Connectivity issues, monitoring tools, documentation updates, and domain verification processes are also areas for improvement. Regulatory challenges related to geographical placement and occasional bugs prompt some to consider alternatives.

What are the key features?

Global Accessibility: Ensures content is readily available worldwide, reducing latency and server loads.
Data Caching: Provides efficient caching processes with optimized Points of Presence.
Intuitive Configuration: Offers an easy-to-use interface for seamless setup.
Integrated WAF: Enhances security by protecting against web threats.
Dynamic Content Acceleration: Boosts app performance through faster content delivery.
Geolocation Access: Facilitates precise handling of content delivery based on location.

What benefits should users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Experience improved application delivery speed and reliability.
Global Reach: Achieve broader content delivery and accessibility across regions.
Security: Benefit from robust protection against cyber threats with integrated WAF.
Operational Efficiency: Reduce server load and optimize resource allocation.

In industries like construction, Windows Azure CDN is utilized to deliver static web content and strategic information effectively. Companies leverage it for caching images and files, reducing server load, and ensuring smooth global access. Migrating applications and enhancing regional delivery efficiency underline its core utility in boosting global reach and availability.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.

NORAD, Agreeya Mobility

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Windows Azure CDN

August 2026

Free Report: Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Windows Azure CDN

Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Windows Azure CDN and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Windows Azure CDN report.

See our list of best CDN vendors.

We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.