We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs iGrafx comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs. iGrafx and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We found the technical support to be helpful.""Provides a valuable BPMN feature."

More iGrafx Pros →

"It is an EA tool that is approved by Open Group. It is in the tool register of Open Group.""The profiles and ready-made templates are an extremely helpful feature. This is one of the biggest features that I find very useful in Sparx.""It's a very practical solution. You don't need to do an advanced course to start using this tool.""It provides good utilization and it's a convenient tool for building exact architectural work.""There are a couple of things. Price is one thing, but we also like the scriptability of it. We got into scripting it and automating tasks with it, and it is super duper easy to do and helpful. The API has improved over the years. We automate everything, and I love the automation aspects of it.""There are a lot of features in Enterprise Architect. It allows us to take on a lot of tasks.""It has led some teams to do better code reviews - to be less focussed on coding conventions (syntax) and more focussed on the semantics because of the abstraction level clear design affords.""Ability to keep inventory of reusable blocks, and use in different diagrams with views of various templates."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pros →

Cons
"The price could be more competitive.""It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."

More iGrafx Cons →

"I think the product is good. When I'm trying to do something specific for some part of project documentation, it's hard to get it figured out if you don't use it all the time. It's such a massive tool, it's hard to figure out how to dig in and get to the documentation where you have to be to get some idea of what to do. There are not a lot of examples that I'm aware of to be able to do that.""It could be more user-friendly. The tools could be more simple to use. It's a very complex solution. Because I am a business analyst, I use these tools to manage requirements, and I make models in UML, BPMN, and ArchiMate, and it's complex. In the next release, I would like to see more integrations.""Even if there are web-based tools in the Enterprise Architecture tool ecosystem (like Prolaborate), the main modeling application is still a fat client application.""Sparx can be a bit slow. If you are trying to design software architecture, sometimes we run into issues and need to refresh.""Its usability needs to be improved. For non-technical users, it is a little difficult to understand how Enterprise Architect works. Users who are not engineers find it difficult to understand how this tool works. This is something they need to work on. They can develop a BPM model to simulate processes.""This solution has some limitations from a business perspective.""The Business Process Modeling or BPM feature can be improved to make it more interactive and user friendly because it is a tool for technical people. My current use is only for business process modeling notation and putting in the icons etc. You need to take them in as a class, which makes things very complex. Because of this complexity, it is not an easy-to-handle solution. Enterprise Architect is not very good for mockups. We cannot create user screens and other similar kinds of stuff, which is bad. For these things, we prefer to use Axure RP and other similar solutions. They should either remove this feature from this product or provide some kind of connectivity with Axure RP so that people can do better mockups of screens and import them. They need to augment and strengthen the BPM feature, which is the main feature. They need to put in some elements like artificial intelligence and augmented reality. They should look into such features because these things are coming up.""The areas of improvement should be focused on utility service such as producing better graphics, perhaps having a wider image library set and producing better models for working directly with customers."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing is not as expensive as some of the other data modeling tools such as Erwin."
  • "Its price is very good for the value that you get with it."
  • "They have the price on their site for the enterprise version, and we do receive a small discount."
  • "The licence has a costly upfront fee which gets you access. You have to pay an annual maintenance fee, which is less."
  • "It is cheaper than other solutions. Its cost is around $686 per year. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "We have an annual license, and it's very affordable."
  • "I think our license costs roughly $1,000 a year, but I could be wrong."
  • "There is a license for this solution. When comparing this solution to others it is priced well."
  • More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    We found the technical support to be helpful.
    Top Answer: 
    Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a reseller in Mexico. The product needs better product distribution. It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us.
    Top Answer: 
    We primarily used the solution as a repository for process management.
    Top Answer: 
    The license I use is on-premise. We haven't gone to the cloud where we have to pay monthly or something like that. Sparx is cheaper than most similar tools.
    Top Answer: 
    I have found the solution is lacking options. The general usability needs improvement and more compliance to CML definitions.
    Ranking
    19th
    Views
    2,259
    Comparisons
    1,632
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    465
    Rating
    8.5
    3rd
    Views
    20,225
    Comparisons
    14,941
    Reviews
    34
    Average Words per Review
    587
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Sparx Systems
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    iGrafx business process management and analysis solutions empower organizations to achieve maximum performance. iGrafx captures and communicates the alignment of strategy, people, processes and technology, and unites the entire organization around delivering business value. iGrafx delivers strategic and operational decision support to enable our customers to become and remain world class competitors.

    Sparx Enterprise Architect is a platform that accelerates and integrates software, business and systems development. Twice winner of Jolt and multiple SD Times Awards with an installed base of 580,000 + licenses, supported by 230 partners in 160 countries. From requirements to implementation and beyond, Sparx Systems' Enterprise Architect is a fully featured tool suite that lets you model, design, simulate, prototype, build, test, manage and trace from vision to solution.

    Offer
    Learn more about iGrafx
    Learn more about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
    Sample Customers
    Multinational Bank
    OmniLink
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Consumer Goods Company38%
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Engineering Company13%
    Pharma/Biotech Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Government17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs. iGrafx and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    iGrafx is ranked 19th in Business Process Design with 2 reviews while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 35 reviews. iGrafx is rated 8.6, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of iGrafx writes "Easy to set up with useful features and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Great pricing with an easy initial setup and a comprehensive toolkit". iGrafx is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, Visual Paradigm, SAP Signavio Process Manager and IBM Blueworks Live, whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, No Magic MagicDraw, Visio, ARIS BPA and IBM Rational System Architect. See our Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs. iGrafx report.

    See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.