IFS Cloud Platform vs QAD Cloud ERP comparison

IFS and QAD are both solutions in the ERP category. IFS is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while QAD is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.5. IFS holds a 2.6% mindshare in ERP, compared to QAD’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QAD users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 30 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

2,027 Views
1,296 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

QAD Cloud ERP

Read 3 QAD Cloud ERP reviews

423 Views
302 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

QAD Cloud ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

IFS Cloud Platform and QAD Cloud ERP are competing in the cloud-based ERP space. IFS Cloud Platform may hold the upper hand with capabilities more aligned with certain industries, while QAD excels in manufacturing-focused functionalities.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform offers robust asset, project, and service management, making it favorable for aerospace, construction, and energy industries. QAD Cloud ERP is distinct for its manufacturing, supply chain management, and automotive industry solutions, providing deep sector-specific insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IFS Cloud Platform provides flexible deployment options suited for diverse organizational needs with supportive customer service. QAD Cloud ERP is noted for its streamlined deployment and robust support services, often faster to implement in standard configurations, emphasizing quick time-to-value.

Pricing and ROI: IFS Cloud Platform might entail higher initial costs but offers significant ROI through its extensive functionality and industry alignment. QAD Cloud ERP presents a competitive pricing model, with quick implementation times enhancing quicker ROI. The decision may hinge on budget versus long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. QAD Cloud ERP

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in ERP

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (20th), Customer Experience Management (7th), Field Service Management (1st), Help Desk Software (12th), Activity Based Costing Software (7th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (8th), IT Asset Management (10th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (11th), License Management (2nd)

QAD Cloud ERP

Ranking in ERP

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 2.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QAD Cloud ERP is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

Abbas Hirkani

Sr. Project Manager at YASH Technologies

Quick implementation brings comprehensive workflow management and efficient regulation handling

One of the major advantages of QAD Cloud ERP is related to the easy and quick implementation that I have found the most valuable. The entire application of QAD Cloud ERP itself is very valuable for my customers. My impression of the advanced supply chain management feature in QAD Cloud ERP is that it's a very comfortable tool and, if rightly configured, it really helps the business to have clear visibility of the entire supply chain. My impression of the compliance management in QAD Cloud ERP is that it has reduced many overheads of doing manual compliance, and it is quite easily manageable; it is connected with the regulatory authorities, making it a fantastic tool. The positive impact my customers have experienced from using QAD Cloud ERP includes easy integration with multiple different applications, connectivity with regulatory authorities and banks, having bank drivers for easy payments and receiving money, and it has fantastic web UI reporting, which satisfies many different stakeholders within the entire organization worldwide.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The workflow of the solution is very good."

"Feature-wise, I like the way it provides inventory details...It is a stable solution."

"When it comes to financing, the solution has helped us to concentrate finance functions like accounting processes in one system. This includes about 70 internal entities around the world."

"Individual user profiles that can be configured as templates to minimize data entry."

"I like the connectivity and interfaces. In V10, it's easy to modify the interfaces and layouts, but it's becoming more complicated in the cloud. IFS is excellent at asset maintenance and incident management. They have specialized modules for IFS that cover incident and asset management and everything else connected to finance. The reporting in IFS is also easy to use."

"The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."

"All the modules are valuable in their own right, but everything has to go through the ERP. IFS has done an excellent job integrating the various modules to complete these processes. My expertise is in the finance module, but I have used the other verticals. It's an all-around good product."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"The positive impact my customers have experienced from using QAD Cloud ERP includes easy integration with multiple different applications, connectivity with regulatory authorities and banks, having bank drivers for easy payments and receiving money, and it has fantastic web UI reporting, which satisfies many different stakeholders within the entire organization worldwide."

"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."

"The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."

Cons

"Technical support could be improved."

"The CRM was shaky and although this improves in Apps 10, there is room for improvement."

"There should be some improvements in the predefined templates in IFS Applications."

"It would be ideal if, in the future, the product could incorporate IoT and blockchain elements. We'd like to explore more of these types of features going forward."

"IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI."

"Aspects of HR and payroll could be better."

"There are certain digital features that need to be incorporated, such as IOP."

"Some kind of bot assistance, some kind of artificial intelligence to help people solve the problems, would be interesting."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."

"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."

"They could improve by moving away from the architecture of Progress 4GL as currently they are undergoing a very drastic change by redoing the entire application with Java and web-based technologies, projected to be released by 2026 with the incorporation of analytics, process intelligence, and AI to help business users."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"The additional cost that comes with the solution includes the overhead of the people who are trying to fix the tool issues. These people are trying to reproduce the issue and report it to the technical support and testing with them which is huge. It is the cost of quality in the end."

"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

"Compared to SAP, the pricing for IFS Applications was very affordable. People using the solution would find that it's worth the money."

"I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Real Estate/Law Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

See all answers

What do you like most about QAD Cloud ERP?

It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QAD Cloud ERP?

I rate the pricing an eight out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QAD Cloud ERP?

The product lacks a lot of features and technology. It is really limited. The tool must improve in almost all areas. There are a lot of things that should be improved in the manufacturing and shop ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 10% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Salesforce Service Cloud vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 38% of the time

Epicor ERP vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 20% of the time

SAP ERP vs QAD Cloud ERP

Compared 17% of the time

More QAD Cloud ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

June 2025

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

ERP

June 2025

Download QAD Cloud ERP product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

MFG/PRO

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.

QAD

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Tower International, Kendra Scott

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. QAD Cloud ERP

June 2025

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. QAD Cloud ERP

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. QAD Cloud ERP and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. QAD Cloud ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.