We performed a comparison between QAD Cloud ERP and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."
"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."
"Responsive, comprehensive and optimized solution."
"SAP S4HANA version 1909 is stable. We have not gone live with 2020 yet."
"The most useful features of SAP S4HANA are the consolidation reports. The BI is very strong and the manufacturing and finance sections we like a lot."
"S4HANA is relatively stable."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S/4HANA is the innovational process. We are able to receive more efficiency or accuracy than previous versions."
"The most valuable feature is the perfect end-to-end integration."
"It is the most stable solution provided by SAP and can be used on all levels."
"I find the Production Planning Cockpit (PPC) and Material Requirements Planning (MRP) most valuable modules."
"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."
"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."
"The cost of the solution is quite high. It needs to be adjusted."
"S/4HANA could be improved with better integration. At the moment, a main issue I see is that there's so much growth in the functionality, complementary modules, and cloud solutions which were acquired by SAP and which extend the functionality of the SAP ERP suite. It looks to me that they tend to acquire more and more functionality from acquisitions, but they don't invest enough effort into making them integrated with S/4HANA or ERP. I would say that the functionality is great, but integration is something which still needs more attention. Instead of focusing on acquisitions, they should invest, integrate, and better the existing portfolio of products in SAP. It would help us, as implementors, to have a more complex or compact solution."
"Thi solution can improve the Bill of Materials (BOM) and production planning."
"The product's use of resources could be improved, as it is quite intensive at the moment."
"If S4HANA has more AI and machine learning, it will be better and easier for reporting and dashboarding."
"I would like to see the AI included to help from a data standpoint."
"This is a costly solution."
"In a feature release, they could improve by adding budgetary features."
QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 25th in ERP with 2 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.