Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator comparison

IBM and Microsoft are both solutions in the Process Automation category. IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0, while Microsoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 0.2% mindshare in PA, compared to Microsoft’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 33% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 172 Views
  • 39 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Microsoft System Center Orc...
Read 2 Microsoft System Center Orchestrator reviews
  • 1,072 Views
  • 219 Comparison Views
33% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator are competing in business process management solutions with automation capabilities. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator appears to have an advantage due to its comprehensive features, despite IBM WebSphere BPMS's favorable support and pricing feedback.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS provides robust integration, process efficiency improvements, and extensive workflow customization. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator stands out for its robust automation capabilities, seamless orchestration across IT systems, and task automation focus, which differentiates it from IBM's business process integration focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator offers a more flexible deployment model with simplified integrations across IT environments, making it favorable for operations flexibility and support. IBM WebSphere BPMS, noted for favorable support, involves a more complex deployment setup.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS features a lower initial setup cost, offering quick ROI with effective process management. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator tends to be higher in cost but is considered a valuable investment due to its enhanced automation features, which contribute to strong long-term ROI. The distinction lies in IBM's cost-efficiency versus Microsoft's feature set value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
33rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft System Center Orc...
Ranking in Process Automation
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

ST
Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing
The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).
Read full review
Dan Campeanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location
The initial setup was quite complex. It required careful preparation of installation steps, as many tasks were not automated as expected. Special attention was needed to prepare groups, users, and permissions at each step to ensure a smooth setup process. Please do so accurately to avoid having to start over. Challenges encountered during deployment included issues with installation and configuration and difficulties detecting machines and executing tasks as expected. Some solutions were found through trial and error during installation, while others were discovered through recommendations from other users. Despite these challenges, the deployment and rollout of Orchestrator took approximately one and a half months to ensure proper functionality.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
 

Cons

"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."
"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."
"We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?
There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?
We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?
I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?
It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?
The platform was almost free of cost for us. We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?
The product's management aspect needs enhancement. It affects the visibility of powerful scripts that were previously accessible. Furthermore, the focus is shifting towards cloud-based features, sp...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
ServiceNow Orchestration vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
ServiceNow Orchestration vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 19% of the time
Camunda vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
Camunda vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 15% of the time
vCenter Orchestrator vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
vCenter Orchestrator vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 13% of the time
BizTalk Server vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
BizTalk Server vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 13% of the time
Rundeck vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Logo
Rundeck vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Compared 12% of the time
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
June 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
June 2025
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator reportDownload Microsoft System Center Orchestrator product report
 

Also Known As

WebSphere BPMS
MS System Center Orchestrator
 

Overview

Information not available
IBM

As an IT administrator, you probably perform a lot of tasks and procedures to keep your computing environment healthy. You may have automated individual tasks, but typically, not the whole process. With System Center - Orchestrator you tie disparate tasks and procedures together using a graphical user interface Runbook Designer to create reliable, flexible, and efficient end-to-end solutions in your IT environment.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
June 2025
Free Report: IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.