Bizagi vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Bizagi and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bizagi is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Bizagi holds a 6.2% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 81 Bizagi reviews

3,008 Views
67 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

172 Views
39 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Bizagi

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Bizagi compete in the Business Process Management Software space, with Bizagi often having an upper hand for its comprehensive features despite potentially higher costs.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers enterprise-level integration, supports complex deployments, and provides extensive process automation capabilities. Bizagi is known for its user-friendly design, rapid application development, and agility in process improvements. It allows businesses to quickly automate and modify processes, facilitating better responsiveness.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS can improve its ease of deployment, reducing complexity in on-premise installations. Enhancing user experience can also be considered. Bizagi could refine its error identification in integration features and improve the intuitiveness of its more technical functions. Additional enhancement of orchestration capabilities and REST integration could benefit Bizagi's adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bizagi’s cloud-based deployment model simplifies setup and scaling, paired with responsive customer service. IBM WebSphere BPMS, while comprehensive in support services, demands complex on-premise installation and system configuration, which can be challenging for immediate deployments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS typically necessitates a higher initial investment due to its integration and scalability, but it offers good long-term ROI for businesses with complex automation needs. Bizagi provides a cost-effective setup with a quicker ROI, making it suitable for companies aiming for rapid improvements without extensive initial spending.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Process Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (4th), Business Process Management (BPM) (5th), Rapid Application Development Software (16th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (6th)

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 6.2%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration

Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.

Read full review

Samuel Tsang

Senior Project Manager at Bank Of China(Hong Kong) Limited

Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing

The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."

"The product has a comfortable GUI and a good environment for users."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the process modeling part and process simulation."

"The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products."

"Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."

"The API is pretty straightforward."

"The approval process is simple."

"The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations."

More Bizagi pros

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

Cons

"In business process mapping, you have pools and dark pools. I don't see that Bizagi differentiates between a regular pool and a dark pool."

"Cloud support for their process mapping tool could be better. To map all your processes in any way and call your data, you need to download their on-premise setup or their desktop setup. Cloud support for process mapping is limited, and they should work on that."

"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."

"I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected."

"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."

"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"The solution was very limited."

More Bizagi cons

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Some solutions are completely free. One would be the business process diagramming tool, the server beneath it, and the automation tool. You don't need to pay to map the business process, but you would need to when you want to execute any of the commands. So, basically, they lure you in with a free ride, and when you want to scale the solution, you'll have to pay for it."

"From what I know of the market, I think Bizagi is a cheap solution for process engineering. Out of the solutions I've tried, from cheapest to most expensive, would be Vizor, Bizagi, Signavio, and then Siemens. I used a version of Bizagi that my university provided for free, so I have never paid for a license."

"It is expensive."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

"The pricing model is good; I believe it's free for up to 20 users, and then they start charging. I hear the solution can get quite expensive, however."

"We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it."

"My company uses the free version of the product."

"Pricing is good value for money."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 24% of the time

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 21% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

Bonita vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

June 2025

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

WebSphere BPMS

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

Information not available

IBM

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.