BizTalk Server vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.1, while IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IBM users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 14 BizTalk Server reviews

495 Views
124 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 5 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

172 Views
39 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and BizTalk Server compete in the business process management system market, with IBM WebSphere BPMS often seen as superior due to its advanced integration capabilities.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS focuses on scalability and comprehensive process mapping, with robust tools for automation and optimization. It seamlessly integrates with enterprise applications, enhancing connectivity. BizTalk Server is equipped with strong application integration abilities, offering seamless data exchange with diverse adapters catering to various enterprise needs. While both provide extensive integration options, IBM WebSphere BPMS is typically recognized for its superior process automation.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve its deployment complexity, user interface design, and initial training requirements. BizTalk Server might enhance its user documentation clarity, reduce the steep learning curve, and broaden support for emerging technologies. Enhancements in these aspects could elevate user experience for both products.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS involves a more complex deployment process but is supported with thorough documentation and responsive customer service, aiding in smoother implementation. BizTalk Server offers a streamlined deployment with a strong support network, fitting businesses in search of rapid integration. IBM WebSphere BPMS necessitates more initial effort in deployment, yet offers comprehensive support. BizTalk Server is preferred for easy setup and operational flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS bears higher initial setup costs, but promises a high ROI for large enterprises demanding sophisticated process management. BizTalk Server provides a cost-effective setup with a focus on flexibility, yielding solid ROI through adaptable integration capabilities. Organizations prioritizing high-end process automation may find greater value in IBM WebSphere BPMS, while those valuing cost-effective agility may lean toward BizTalk Server.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Process Automation

14th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (8th)

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Vignesh Kumar Sekar

Senior Analyst at Sword Group

Enables message routing and provides a secure way to communicate between two systems

The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes. It enables a handshake with the source and target systems using certificates. It is the most secure way of communicating between two systems. It is an advantage. We can do a lot of message routing. If we want to handle large data, we can put the data into different patterns to process it. We can do it through sequential convoy or parallel convoy orchestration. BizTalk comes with SQL Server. We can load temporary data in the database and use the batch process from BizTalk. It is an added advantage. Creating agreements is a manual job, but it's quite easy in BizTalk. Even a fresh college graduate can configure AS2 certificates and partner profiles and communicate with other systems. It is easy.

Read full review

Samuel Tsang

Senior Project Manager at Bank Of China(Hong Kong) Limited

Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing

The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Essentially, you can do whatever you like with these systems, and you do not have to take care about the scaling because if one server is overloaded, it just forwards the message to the next server, even if it were designated to a specific server. It weeds out the messages according to the load. If you want to scale it, you just add new servers."

"The most valuable feature of BizTalk Server is that it will turn XML into flexible transactions."

"I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good."

"BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation."

"The most valuable feature is its reliability and stability. The first version of BizTalk was released in 2000, and many companies still use it. It was stable until 2013 when we had support."

"BIzTalk's integration with Visual Studio is the most valuable feature of this product."

"The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes."

More BizTalk Server pros

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

Cons

"BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages."

"BizTalk lacks native cloud support. BizTalk doesn't offer in-built support for cloud. We need to use third-party adapters to connect it to cloud services."

"It's a complex product because you have many degrees of freedom to connect different parts together. Whether it's sensible or not, is up to you, but the machine does allow it. But because of the vast degrees of freedom, it's complex."

"It's an on-premises system, requiring physical servers for deployment. This is different from Azure; you don't need any servers with Azure. If you have a subscription, you can do whatever you want. There are unit restrictions based on the environment (like non-production vs. production) in BizTalk. You need physical servers and databases. In Azure, those are not required – it's all in the cloud."

"Updating things in BizTalk is a headache."

"BizTalk Server is an outdated legacy system that does not support messaging."

"The product could be improved in monitoring, managing, and support functionalities."

"The deployment could be simplified."

More BizTalk Server cons

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BizTalk Server is not freeware. There's a significant licensing cost involved. Be sure you will actually utilize its features fully."

"Based on the knowledge, it is relatively cheaper than Azure Identity Services and cloud services in general."

"It was not cheap, but it was affordable."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost will depend on the client's requirements."

"BizTalk Server is cheap. I would rate its pricing a two out of five."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

BizTalk Server has adapted to the changing needs of business over time with steady development, but there are new requirements, for example, on APIs, application programming interfaces. That functi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 16% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 14% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 11% of the time

Control-M vs BizTalk Server

Compared 8% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

June 2025

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

WebSphere BPMS

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

Information not available

IBM

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.