IBM SoftLayer vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
154 views|104 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,748 views|1,643 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM SoftLayer and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer.""The stability is the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."

More IBM SoftLayer Pros →

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security.""The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use.""One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified.""For us, the versioning was an issue."

More IBM SoftLayer Cons →

"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks.""Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity.""Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have a yearly subscription for the product."
  • "Oracle Cloud Object Storage might not be that expensive compared to on-premises solutions."
  • "Disaster recovery (DR) can be expensive."
  • More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security.
    Top Answer:We have a yearly subscription for the product.
    Top Answer:Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security.
    Ranking
    Views
    154
    Comparisons
    104
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,748
    Comparisons
    1,643
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    259
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CloudLayer
    Learn More
    Overview

    SoftLayer provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. Our customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.

    Products and services include bare metal and virtual servers, networking, turnkey big data solutions, private cloud solutions, and more. Our unique advantages include the industry's first Network-Within-a-Network topology for true out-of-band access, and an easy-to-use customer portal and robust API for full remote-access of all product and service management options.

    Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

    Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

    Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

    Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

    Sample Customers
    Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Grace Co. Ltd., Keyword, Uvionics Tech, Tennis Australia, immixGroup, Salesbox, Cxense ASA, Avnet Inc., Komsomolskaya Pravda, Seekr
    Brinks
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Public Cloud Storage Services
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM SoftLayer is ranked 22nd in Public Cloud Storage Services while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. IBM SoftLayer is rated 8.6, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM SoftLayer writes "Stable with excellent speed and agility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". IBM SoftLayer is most compared with Amazon AWS, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service and Google Cloud Storage.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.