IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Katalon Test Ops comparison

"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."

"I noticed that only the enterprise version has integration with GitHub."

"It's more user-friendly as a solution."

"Katalon Test Ops has AI features that speed up the process by automating tasks that would otherwise be done manually."

"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."

"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."

"There are stability troubles. My area does not have a good connection. That's why sometimes I face issues."

"The execution module of Katalon Test Ops may need some improvement, especially when running a high volume of test scripts."

"The free version is limited."

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."