Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs Veritas InfoScale Availability comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM PowerHA System Mirror
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veritas InfoScale Availability
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of IBM PowerHA System Mirror is 9.8%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas InfoScale Availability is 24.4%, down from 27.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Veritas InfoScale Availability24.4%
IBM PowerHA System Mirror9.8%
Other65.8%
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

HP
Senior Infrastructure Solutions Architect at Wysetek Systems Technologists Pvt. Ltd.
During failovers or site switches it integrates the storage and ensures the transition of your applications
In terms of interoperability and compatibility, every time new applications and database levels are released, a thorough compatibility check is conducted in PowerHA. IBM consistently ensures compatibility, especially in the open systems environment and within the Unix platform, where software compatibility challenges are prevalent. Regarding components controlled under PowerHA, IBM occasionally must address compatibility issues by providing fixes and releases. Despite this, the product exhibits stability. However, the main issue arises when components are updated, requiring IBM to release corresponding fixes. This process may take some time, but it is routinely addressed. Regarding product stability, PowerHA is generally reliable, with the only notable challenge being the need for fixes during component updates. It would be beneficial if the software had options for controlling and implementing an active-active setup, although PowerHA is primarily designed for active-passive configurations.
it_user281973 - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage and VMware Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
It provides a stable SAP environment, but deployment does require someone with experience.
It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment In my last job, it provided a great SAP environment that was stable and running on Veritas Cluster. I've used it for six years. It's not so easy in some cases, and you will need some experience. There were…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are that it's robust and reliable and that the CP memory can be updated in runtime."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
 

Cons

"The initial setup could be simpler."
"It could be more stable and more secure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM doesn't publish its prices, so it's hard to compare its pricing to know how costly it is."
"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
University
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM PowerHA System Mirror?
IBM PowerHA offers multiple editions. You can choose between the base, enterprise, or standard edition. If you intend to use it for purposes other than just ratio and not for HDR, and if you requir...
What needs improvement with IBM PowerHA System Mirror?
In terms of interoperability and compatibility, every time new applications and database levels are released, a thorough compatibility check is conducted in PowerHA. IBM consistently ensures compat...
What is your primary use case for IBM PowerHA System Mirror?
We use IBM PowerHA SystemMirror for high availability and VM protection. It covers scenarios like local node failures or even outages across entire sites. Additionally, it can manage workloads runn...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PowerHA System Mirror
InfoScale Availability, Veritas Cluster Server (VCS), Veritas InfoScale
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Arctic Line, Wªrth Group, Balluff, Al Mansour Holding Company, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising, SAIC FIAT Powertrain Hongyan, Vishay
Wayne State University, Zenith Mart
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs. Veritas InfoScale Availability and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.