We performed a comparison between HPE Serviceguard and IBM PowerHA System Mirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Veritas and others in High Availability Clustering."The solution's scalability is excellent."
"HPE Serviceguard is stable, it has high availability for production."
"The most valuable features are that it's robust and reliable and that the CP memory can be updated in runtime."
"Many customers want virtualization or high availability but not on HPE Serviceguard with the appliance."
"They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static."
"The initial setup could be simpler."
HPE Serviceguard is ranked 5th in High Availability Clustering with 2 reviews while IBM PowerHA System Mirror is ranked 2nd in High Availability Clustering with 2 reviews. HPE Serviceguard is rated 0.0, while IBM PowerHA System Mirror is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HPE Serviceguard writes " The solution's most valuable feature is the ability to create a Mount Point Package ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM PowerHA System Mirror writes "During failovers or site switches it integrates the storage and ensures the transition of your applications". HPE Serviceguard is most compared with Windows Server Failover Clustering, Veritas InfoScale Availability and DRBD, whereas IBM PowerHA System Mirror is most compared with Windows Server Failover Clustering and Veritas InfoScale Availability.
See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.
We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.