No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM DOORS vs Jira vs PTC Integrity Requirements Connector comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of IBM DOORS is 25.5%, down from 34.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jira is 11.2%, down from 15.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is 3.1%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM DOORS25.5%
Jira11.2%
PTC Integrity Requirements Connector3.1%
Other60.199999999999996%
Application Requirements Management
 

Featured Reviews

Amol Dumbre - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Manager at Forvia
Integrated lifecycle management has supported global A‑SPICE projects and custom reporting
I believe the toolchain currently covers all of our requirements. Even for A-SPICE and related requirements, I can add attributes and manage things effectively because the tool is highly customizable. I can continue updating things and managing different processes. The only gap I have identified is in code-level coverage reporting. I have coverage traceability from IBM DOORS through the architecture and design, but I am unable to demonstrate code-level coverage reporting. That reporting capability would be helpful. Testing is covered very well through IBM Test Manager. The traceability to code is something I feel there may be certain gaps in, though I may not be fully aware of all capabilities since my role is different and I primarily receive reports rather than being an end user. Regarding the traceability feature, I am not an end user but rather receive reports from my team, so my perspective is limited.
Akhil Viswam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery
Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.
Sandipan Roy - PeerSpot reviewer
Electronic System Product Specialist at Cummins Inc.
A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability
I see that when we just define the configuration management part, it is a completely different case. Somehow in our organization or current profile, we are not built to make that linkage between that requirement and the configuration management part. So, if it is making some kind of accountability there or some kind of configuration linkage, then it would be a little bit helpful. The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user. At least for the new commerce may be. If it is possible, they can make it module-wise for the PTC Integrity team. To give along with the PTC channel itself, then it might be a little bit helpful. For example, as in the MATLAB that we are using, users have ample amount of use cases there and resources by which they can explore the learning part also. So, if it is possible for PTC Integrity directly to get that one, it will be helpful for the new users.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution."
"I have had no problem with stability and I think that it's worked very well."
"The most valuable feature is the management verification and login."
"I am able to create a traceability and impact analysis report of a set of 20+ documents in minutes, and then use the tool to help verify that the data is accurate."
"The recommendation aspects of the solution are good."
"There are a few other requirements management tools, but none are at this level of solving complex situations."
"It helps to manage requirements efficiently, which significantly improves the way requirements are managed."
"It is very customizable and easy to scale."
"The fact that Jira was so simple to understand was a huge boon in my book because I didn't have to waste time trying to learn the tool to get work done and move the squad along."
"JIRA stores history of changes, which helps a lot to track who, when, and why the issue was modified​."
"The simplicity of Jira is the part that I like the most, as well as the way in which it can be extended."
"Jira is quite easy to use and very simple from my point of view."
"We are interested in migrating to Jira and using it as our internal tool for agile projects and for controlling the IT software development cycle for projects like consulting or API."
"The agile framework works well, and I pretty much live by that. Everything, such as sprint management, is laid out."
"The dynamic communication and the ability to customize it the way we want are the most valuable features."
"Jira is easier to configure than other platforms like DevOps, is fairly easy to learn so long as you dedicate some time to it, and is easier to use than other solutions."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
 

Cons

"One thing that I would like to see is a lower-cost version of it that we could use for smaller projects. Sometimes, we do projects for commercial customers who would benefit from something like DOORS, but it's just so expensive. It's just a monster, so a lower-cost version would be the thing that we'd like to see."
"The low performance of the solution is probably because it is quite an old tool."
"Usability and user-friendliness could definitely be improved as far as ease-of-use."
"There needs to be quicker access to tech support. When I have a two minute question that takes two minutes to answer, it shouldn't take me 45 minutes and/or a few days of callbacks to get to the right technical support person. It's unnecessary and frustrating for the user."
"The interface needs an area to be able to type your query and actually be able to find them."
"The user interface for the Change Proposal System could be improved."
"Both the performance and the price could be improved."
"They need to provide users with information on what options would be best for their setup."
"It can have a more high-level view of portfolios. It has quite detailed views, but I would like a high-level view of portfolios. We want to integrate Jira with Microsoft Active Directory, and I don't know how easy or hard it is going to be. I don't know if Jira supports this. We are starting that integration in the last quarter of this year. I hope to find all the required tools for this integration."
"Something I do not like about the new version is that there is a need to browse all the way back to the beginning, should a person click on a task that is specifically for his group and wish to go back and look at the other portfolios or people."
"The reports in Jira can be improved, especially for test reports."
"So at one point in time, they did a huge UI upgrade. At that time, I felt like they had changed something, so it was hard to figure out. Now that we are habituated, it's not an issue now."
"The reporting tool and the approval tool need work."
"There is a steep learning curve for administration. While the tool is fairly easy for our users to understand and use, what it takes to set up the system to make it easy for end users is fairly complex."
"It should be less expensive."
"There is a difference between their cloud and their server versions. The next-gen project, which is an advanced feature that allows you to visualize the road map of your delivery over multiple products and over time, is not available yet for the server version."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing can vary depending on the size of the organization and how contracts are negotiated."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive."
"We have to pay for a license. I think it's a one-time payment as my company hasn't notified me about more charges. I don't think it's expensive for large corporations, but it will be costly for an average person."
"I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars."
"It is expensive to onboard additional users."
"I think it's expensive because you have to pay for the licenses to IBM and all that and maintain them."
"The licensing cost is too high."
"It's expensive."
"To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money."
"I don't feel that price is an issue."
"We used to be on a perpetual license provided by our clients."
"We have an enterprise license that includes cloud service and support."
"Its price is good and similar to other products. It is about five or six dollars per user."
"I understand JIRA is quite expensive."
"Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution."
"JIRA's pricing is very economical. I would say that JIRA is a great deal more economical than Microsoft."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
25%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
7%
Government
6%
University
5%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
32%
Consumer Goods Company
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Construction Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise38
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business107
Midsize Enterprise58
Large Enterprise151
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS?
Over the years, the first version cost something around 5800 euros.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS?
I believe the toolchain currently covers all of our requirements. Even for A-SPICE and related requirements, I can ad...
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational DOORS?
I manage the entire application lifecycle management, which includes requirement management, architecture, and softwa...
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below d...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?
Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Rational DOORS
Jira Software
PTC IRC
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Infosys, Chevrolet Volt
Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Cummins, Continental
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Jama and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2026.
886,426 professionals have used our research since 2012.