We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"It is a stable solution."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"The product is easy to use."
"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."
"Functionality-wise, I like WSO2 API Manager - Publisher API and WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus."
"WSO2 is very stable."
"One of the great things about WSO2 API Manager is that it is so easy to adopt. And because it's an open source solution, we're able to extend the implementation any time to suit our company needs better."
"This solution is a little bit faster, easier to use, and has better integration than the other solutions I have experienced."
"The main feature — the publication of the API, the management section — is great in general."
"It's a good product."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The pricing can be improved."
"The product hasn’t been updated for some time."
"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."
"The price and the complexities attached to the solution are two areas of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution could be more user friendly for engineers."
"WSO2 API Manager could increase their security compliance."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
"Based on our recent large scaling project, the latency needs to be improved."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 21st in API Management with 4 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 7th in API Management with 33 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Apache APISIX. See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.