IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

IBM and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.5, while WSO2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. IBM holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

1,159 Views
556 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 41 WSO2 API Manager reviews

4,899 Views
4,899 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

WSO2 API Manager and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are competitive products in the API management and integration space. WSO2 API Manager appeals for its cost-effectiveness whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration stands out for its comprehensive features.

Features:WSO2 API Manager offers seamless API lifecycle management, strong analytics, and scalability, primarily due to its open-source flexibility. It provides robust support services and a simple user interface. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration boasts end-to-end integration capabilities, hybrid cloud flexibility, and AI-driven automation. It offers advanced integration and broad functionality, distinguishing it with comprehensive features suitable for complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement:WSO2 API Manager could enhance its integration capacity to match broader enterprise needs, expand support for advanced security features, and improve the documentation of new functionalities. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration could streamline its setup process to simplify deployment, reduce overall complexity, and provide more cost-effective pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:WSO2 API Manager is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive support, making it user-friendly. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration involves more intricate setups due to its comprehensive nature, but its robust documentation and superior customer service assist in mitigating complexities. WSO2 provides a more direct approach, whereas IBM delivers a stable deployment environment for complex needs.

Pricing and ROI:WSO2 API Manager is attractive for its lower setup costs and agile ROI, making it appealing for cost-efficient solutions. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration requires a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI through extensive integration capabilities and efficiency improvements. The primary contrast lies in affordability versus comprehensive return value, where WSO2 offers cost savings, and IBM offers high returns for strategic investments.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (16th)

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.7%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WSO2 API Manager	4.7%
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration	0.5%
Other	94.8%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

VishalSingh14

IT Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration

I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"It is a stable solution."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"The product is easy to use."

"As far as I am aware this solution is the first API Publisher that allows you to create and publish API and to manage the API lifecycle."

"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."

"API management lifecycle is the most valuable."

"The most beneficial feature of WSO2 API Manager is its capability to use Swagger to define and then populate the API."

"A complete integration suite and a good platform."

"Yes WSO2 API Manager is scalable"

"The solution is open source and easy to configure."

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"The pricing can be improved."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"The price and the complexities attached to the solution are two areas of concern where improvements are required."

"Based on our recent large scaling project, the latency needs to be improved."

"Dashboards for application monitoring of the APIs would be beneficial, allowing us to check for faulty APIs."

"The technical support must be improved."

"I would like to see improvements in the speed of the solution as it can be a bit slow compared to other platforms along with addressing memory issues would be beneficial."

"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."

"WSO2 API Manager could improve by adding external API security features, which is one area where there is room for enhancement. Internally, API security is strong, and all other necessary features are already available. It has a solid marketplace, supports both Docker and standalone setups, and offers great enterprise integration. The developer portal has greatly improved the user experience, making it simple and user-friendly wherever we’ve implemented it. Overall, it’s not as complicated as other API gateways."

"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"My previous company paid about 1.2 million dollars, and my current company pays about 300k. Both companies are at the enterprise level."

"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."

"We have not opted for the paid version of WSO2 but we have implemented the free and open source WSO2 software to a great extent and it is working as per our expectation."

"WSO2 API Manager is quite an expensive tool. I rate the product's pricing a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."

"WSO2 API Manager is an open-source solution."

"There is a subscription-based pricing structure and also the open-sourced version available."

"I am using the free version."

"It is an open-source product."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 39% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 13% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 11% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 20% of the time

Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 18% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 10% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

August 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

September 2025

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager

September 2025

Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.