IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Oracle Big Data SQL comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. IBM holds a 2.1% mindshare in CDI, compared to Oracle’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

649 Views
474 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Big Data SQL

Read 2 Oracle Big Data SQL reviews

87 Views
63 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Oracle Big Data SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and Oracle Big Data SQL compete in enterprise data management and integration. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive service offerings, while Oracle excels in data handling and analytics for large datasets.

Features: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers application and data integration, event streaming, and API management, meeting diverse enterprise requirements. Oracle Big Data SQL provides advanced analytics, efficient data processing, and SQL query execution across Hadoop, NoSQL, and Oracle Database systems. The strengths lie in IBM's integration solutions compared to Oracle's analytics capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is known for cloud-native deployment and a containerized design, simplifying deployment. It provides robust customer service with extensive support options. Oracle Big Data SQL offers scalable deployment but requires more expertise for optimal setup, focusing customer service on advanced support plans.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration features scalable pricing models yielding higher ROI in integration-centric applications, being cost-effective for diverse integration needs. Oracle Big Data SQL has higher setup costs but delivers substantial ROI for high-performance data analytics, highlighting IBM's cost efficiency in integration versus Oracle's value in data-heavy environments.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Oracle Big Data SQL Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Oracle Big Data SQL

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (24th)

Oracle Big Data SQL

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Big Data SQL is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Mohamed Moustafa

General Manager at Quit cement

Offers good scalability, strong stability and seamless integration

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive. It was a major plus. The integration process was smooth. Oracle's security is good and significantly better than that of other solutions I've encountered. Previously, we had separate data interfaces for 15 concrete mixing plants, requiring manual document creation in Oracle. Now, with integrated automation, production has become much easier and more efficient over the past three years.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive."

"This solution can maintain a large volume of data and is flexible to what data it can handle. The performance is very good."

Cons

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The solution could improve by adding more advanced features."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Big Data SQL?

The user interface is really user-friendly and intuitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Big Data SQL?

There is room for improvement in the pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Big Data SQL?

With Oracle Big Data SQL, I primarily managed data organization and structure. It helped streamline data within the system. I integrated Oracle with other systems. I worked with Oracle integrations...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 45% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 15% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Palantir Foundry vs Oracle Big Data SQL

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle Big Data SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

April 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

March 2025

Download Oracle Big Data SQL product report

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

A culture of innovation has propelled Oracle since its inception. Today, thanks to exceptional people, we lead the market in autonomous, cloud, and applications technologies.

Oracle

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Oracle Big Data SQL

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Oracle Big Data SQL

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Oracle Big Data SQL and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Oracle Big Data SQL report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.