IBM B2B Integrator vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Mule ESB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,686 views|814 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
1,753 views|1,382 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
MuleSoft Logo
7,174 views|5,877 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.""The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle.""Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations.""B2B provides a secure communication channel.""I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable.""The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive.""It can scale horizontally as well as vertically as a cluster.""This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."

More IBM B2B Integrator Pros →

"The solution is extremely scalable.""They have multiple features for each kind of task and issue. The company has different channels to give information to the administration. Security and integration capabilities are also important. This product has helped to replace a lot of other solutions, saving time and cost.""We are able to monitor all B2B messages, and we are able to see or track each message on it from an error perspective. That's a good side of it. It is working well, and we're able to do our current job.""They have best-in-class, quality support.""The product's most valuable feature is the real-time integration suite."

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Pros →

"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier.""I'm not using ESB directly. It is the integration layer, so it's running under the hood. However, the conversion and transformation performance is excellent. Anypoint Enterprise Security is also solid.""Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community.""The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily.""The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave.""It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications.""Easy connectivity and easy integration.""Scalability and load balancing."

More Mule ESB Pros →

Cons
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios.""The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit.""IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly.""The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with.""Map translator needs more enhancements.""API-Fication required, and there should be more clarity on their cloud migration strategy.""Patching or upgrading the product is a bit of a nightmare. It would be nice if they removed the installation manager port. We find it complicates upgrading and patching a great deal.""They do not have a solid partner ecosystem, and they do not have a clear roadmap for down the line; they're missing that clear roadmap."

More IBM B2B Integrator Cons →

"It can be now classified as a legacy system because there are no more updates. From what I know, there will be no updates for the current version, which is an issue. Therefore, we are looking for a compatible new software that we can use. We're currently researching what is there in the market. We would consider something that would give us better speed on our current processor. There is also room for improvement in terms of its scalability and GUI. It is an old system, and its scalability can be improved. Its GUI can also be more appealing.""Onboarding on the solution is complex. It's hard to onboard partners and customer suppliers. It's one aspect that is not that straightforward.""They can improve APIs because they are still lagging behind in API connectivity. With non-API connectivity, they're market leaders, but API connectivity, they're still in the immature space.""The only weaknesses they have different governance for each task and different channels for communication which are hard to maintain. The relation of the company with other companies can be improved. We have a lot of customers who this platform for the interchange of information which can also be improved. The compliance information about banks can also be updated."

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Cons →

"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work.""Mule ESB is more into the latest REST APIs, not much into the SOAP web services. Developing is all about web services and not easy with Mule.""I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution.""Community editions need more attention.""The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight.""It should have some amount of logging.""The initial setup could be more straightforward.""It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."

More Mule ESB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."
  • "The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."
  • "The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."
  • "Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."
  • "The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."
  • "The product costs more than 40K."
  • More IBM B2B Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is a little bit on the higher side because they give you the best support. Out of ten, I would rate pricing at seven or eight."
  • "They have a good pricing system, in relation to powerful features."
  • "The tool is expensive because of its rich features."
  • More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."
  • "Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners."
  • "The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
  • "The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
  • "This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
  • "Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
  • "This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
  • "I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."
  • More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.
    Top Answer:API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud.
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable feature is the real-time integration suite.
    Top Answer:IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services needs to improve API management. It needs to incorporate a better and more stable… more »
    Top Answer:I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using… more »
    Top Answer:Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,686
    Comparisons
    814
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    450
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    1,753
    Comparisons
    1,382
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    265
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    7,174
    Comparisons
    5,877
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

    IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services are designed to alleviate the burden on internal resources by providing secure connectivity and collaboration with your customers, suppliers, and business partners. The solution is built on the cloud-based B2B integration and visibility capabilities of IBM Sterling B2B Collaboration Network and provides comprehensive service offerings for partner onboarding, B2B process management, and trading partner support.

    • Facilitate growth by rapidly growing and adapting your B2B community without burdening internal resources and capital
    • Reduce B2B total cost of ownership by reducing the cost and increasing the reliability of B2B operations

    Accelerate B2B collaboration with global customers and suppliers by leveraging our B2B expertise.

    For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
    Sample Customers
    Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
    Information Not Available
    Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Transportation Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Retailer9%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company46%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.