Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs ibi WebFOCUS comparison

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It's highly scalable and can handle significant data volumes."

"The most valuable feature is building ad hoc reports."

"The solution can read and write 500 different types of outputs."

"It stands out for its ability to work across different platforms, support mainframe data, offer cloud integration, automate report scheduling, and provide a robust scripting language."

"It is a stable solution."

"I mainly use the solution for the ease of reporting and for executive dashboards."

"The stability of SSRS has been reliable, with minimal issues encountered during our usage."

"We get good support from Microsoft."

"The solution's features are all just wrapped up in one nice easy package. I don't need a lot of toolsets to get everything I need done."

"The tool's valuable features are its drill-down feature, graphs, and charts."

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services has been functional whenever I needed to use it."

"We can create quality reports in real time."

"When it comes to customer support, we don't always reach the right person. Sometimes, we get junior-level reps who aren't as knowledgeable as we are."

"If there were to be any improvements right now, their documentation needs to get in sync with their product."

"The challenge lies not in what the tool can do but in how you use it and understand the data."

"The solution can be improved by adding more automated options for reporting."

"Sometimes, we need to make sure that the configuration stays consistent across the reporting instances. They all connect to the same database. So, it shares that same backend, but the reporting services itself can also be configured. On the application level, for reporting level. And it is, based on my own experience, it is a manual effort to make sure that the reporting servers are configured the same across the environment."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"I would like the solution to add the scheduling feature for reports."

"In this solution, the cost should be reduced for the enterprise edition."

"The setup is difficult because you have to install different servers."

"The complex tuning for report performance is complicated. There is a lack of native support for source code control. We often need to use separate tools like VS Code or other software to manage version control and changes in the database. It would be beneficial if source code management were integrated directly into SSRS, thus eliminating the need to rely on external tools. While CLI-based operations are exemplary, the trend is towards GUI for a better user experience. Integrating both visualization and source code management within SSRS would simplify the process for users."

"The product could be improved by reducing the time it takes to build and deploy reports."

"There are occasions during maintenance runs when the Check Point monitoring system reports a lot of blocked sessions."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The price is pretty good."

"The pricing is high."

"The product pricing is reasonable in terms of suitable features for business."

"The solution is cheaper than its alternatives."

"The solution is free to use for developers."

"The tool's licensing costs are expensive."

"Value-wise, the solution's pricing is good for the price that we pay."

"The solution is expensive."