HPE Superdome X vs Lenovo Flex System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
1,995 views|1,303 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Lenovo Logo
661 views|500 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Superdome X and Lenovo Flex System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We've got a few of them, because we needed some really large machines. So far, they've been working pretty good.""I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.""SDX gave us a very large RAM and we need that for the large-scale graph-handling applications.""One of the really cool things about Superdome is, depending on the model you choose, you can put 8-16 blades in it.""The most valuable features of HPE Superdome X are speed, performance, and resilience.""This product is very reliable.""Superdome X is a system that can compete in terms of performance and uptime, but it's now standard. That is the great value. There are competitors like IBM, for example, but IBM has a propietary operating system. With Superdome X, you have a system that can run Windows, Red Hat, or VMware, but in a mission critical server."

More HPE Superdome X Pros →

"The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads.""Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.""The product is very user-friendly and has many resources at the enterprise level.""One of the most valuable features of this solution is its ease of use.""The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The Lenovo Flex System is very stable."

More Lenovo Flex System Pros →

Cons
"I know we support Windows and I think it's Red Hat, and I'd like to see more OSs supported.""What would make it better from my point of view is if HPE spent more time on testing with the actual built-in Red Hat Linux drivers, as opposed to always trying to say, "Use our driver."""HPE Superdome X can improve by adding a lot of cloud capabilities to allow this solution to be cloud-ready in case the customer wants to move it to the cloud.""It would be helpful if you could do the maintenance completely online.""In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important because we are forced to use two chassis even with lower loads. So introducing more flexibility in the Superdome environment would be helpful.""I'd like to see the onboarding of some storage class memory to really expand the already very large RAM, into something that could be even much bigger."

More HPE Superdome X Cons →

"The product could improve its integration capabilities.""The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.""Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem.""The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one.""It does not have the same module flexibility that was present in IBM Blade. On the Blade System, I was able to choose between the Cisco module, or BMC module. Since the switch to Lenovo, I have not had the same choice of modules, only the BMC modules.""The solution could improve by providing more integration with other platforms."

More Lenovo Flex System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a very expensive one-time cost with no licensing fees."
  • "The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive."
  • More HPE Superdome X Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing."
  • "The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."
  • "There is a one-off payment to buy the equipment and the support is purchased annually."
  • "The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier."
  • "The 14 blade server allows significant room for upscaling before having to invest in another chassis. You would have to purchase another chassis much sooner in the case of an eight or nine blade server."
  • More Lenovo Flex System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the robustness of the machine. Similar performance could likely be achieved with other configurations, but this machine is very stable.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not very cheap. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very inexpensive, and ten being very expensive.
    Top Answer:In this specific model, it could be beneficial to have a server configuration similar to Cisco, like the kind offered in HPE Superdome Flex X280. The ability to separate the chassis is important… more »
    Top Answer:Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.
    Top Answer:The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier.
    Top Answer:Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    1,995
    Comparisons
    1,303
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    8.0
    10th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    661
    Comparisons
    500
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP Integrity Superdome, HP Superdome X
    Flex System Blade Servers, Flex System SN Series
    Learn More
    Overview
    HPE Superdome X is an HPE server that represents a new category of x86 modular, mission-critical systems to consolidate all tiers of critical applications on a common platform. Engineered with trusted Superdome 2 reliability, the HPE Superdome X includes a modular, bladed design, and shares HPE BladeSystem efficiencies including a common server management framework, supported from x86 to Superdome 2. With breakthrough innovations such as the fault-tolerant Crossbar Fabric and Error Analysis Engine coupled with hard partitioning capabilities, Superdome X sets the standard for mission-critical x86 computing.

    Flex System is Lenovo’s proven, 2nd generation blade, that efficiently runs your infrastructure applications with up to 80% better density than standard rack server deployments.

    Sample Customers
    Pella
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE Superdome X is ranked 6th in Blade Servers with 11 reviews while Lenovo Flex System is ranked 10th in Blade Servers with 7 reviews. HPE Superdome X is rated 9.0, while Lenovo Flex System is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Superdome X writes "Robust product, helped with workload management and offers remote configuration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Flex System writes "Provides a high initial ceiling before upscaling is required, user-friendly and rich in resources, but has occasional stability issues". HPE Superdome X is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem, HPE NonStop and HPE Integrity, whereas Lenovo Flex System is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series and Dell PowerEdge M.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.