Lenovo Flex System vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Lenovo and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Lenovo is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7, while Supermicro is ranked #10. Lenovo holds a 3.2% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lenovo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

Lenovo Flex System

Read 10 Lenovo Flex System reviews

400 Views
255 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

730 Views
571 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Lenovo Flex System

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 25, 2025

Supermicro SuperBlade and Lenovo Flex System compete in the high-performance server market. Lenovo Flex System tends to have the upper hand due to advanced features and long-term ROI advantages.

Features: Supermicro SuperBlade features dense compute nodes, efficient power usage, and a straightforward deployment process. Lenovo Flex System offers flexibility with integration capabilities, various processor options, and robust networking features.

Room for Improvement: Supermicro SuperBlade could enhance advanced feature offerings, increase integration capabilities, and provide more processor options. Lenovo Flex System may improve customer service responsiveness, reduce initial investment costs, and simplify feature customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Supermicro SuperBlade provides easy deployment and reliable customer service with responsive support teams. Lenovo Flex System has a more intuitive deployment model, although its customer service is not as highly regarded as Supermicro's.

Pricing and ROI: Supermicro SuperBlade is appealing with a lower setup cost for immediate cost savings. Lenovo Flex System requires a higher initial investment but offers better long-term ROI due to its durability and comprehensive feature set, making it a favorable choice for those prioritizing future value over initial expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed Lenovo Flex System vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Lenovo Flex System vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lenovo Flex System

Ranking in Blade Servers

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Lenovo Flex System is 3.2%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 5.8%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Syed Ibrahim

Assistant Manager Systems - IT Infrastructure at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Provides a high initial ceiling before upscaling is required, user-friendly and rich in resources, but has occasional stability issues

The solution should come with cloud native applications to prepare for cloud based solutions. Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem. The level of customer support needs to be improved. There is currently an issue with Lenovo switching out SAN switches from the chassis, which will cause problems for people who already have a set up with the SAN switch connected to the central storage. This could require an entirely different network, adding an additional cost for the user.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Lenovo Flex System is very stable."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is its ease of use."

"Flex System's best features are its performance and stability."

"The functionality is reliable and requires minimal support."

"We use the solution as a compute model to run the compute load on servers."

"It comes at a good price. We didn't face any problems with this product."

"The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads."

More Lenovo Flex System pros

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

Cons

"The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one."

"It does not have the same module flexibility that was present in IBM Blade. On the Blade System, I was able to choose between the Cisco module, or BMC module. Since the switch to Lenovo, I have not had the same choice of modules, only the BMC modules."

"The solution's firmware and driver upgrades are a bit difficult."

"I had some difficulties with the initial setup."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration with other platforms."

"Continuing the production of this product is necessary. It is currently out of support, and we are seeking support from other sources besides Lenovo."

"The product could improve its integration capabilities."

"Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem."

More Lenovo Flex System cons

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"The solution does not scale well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing."

"The 14 blade server allows significant room for upscaling before having to invest in another chassis. You would have to purchase another chassis much sooner in the case of an eight or nine blade server."

"The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."

"The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier."

"There is a one-off payment to buy the equipment and the support is purchased annually."

"We are just paying the operational cost, which is not much."

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

16%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lenovo Flex System?

Compared to its quality, the pricing is very reasonable and represents good value.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lenovo Flex System?

Continuing the production of this product is necessary. It is currently out of support, and we are seeking support from other sources besides Lenovo.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lenovo Flex System?

We are using Lenovo Flex System on the server for our VMware environment, which includes our VMs and all our servers, Linux and Windows. It manages the daily operation efficiently.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Superdome X vs Lenovo Flex System

Compared 58% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Lenovo Flex System

Compared 42% of the time

More Lenovo Flex System Competitors

Dell PowerEdge M vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 16% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 16% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 14% of the time

HPE Integrity vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 13% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

May 2025

Download Lenovo Flex System product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

May 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

Flex System Blade Servers, Flex System SN Series

SuperBlade

Overview

Flex System is Lenovo’s proven, 2nd generation blade, that efficiently runs your infrastructure applications with up to 80% better density than standard rack server deployments.

Lenovo

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Prace

Buyer's Guide

Lenovo Flex System vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

June 2025

Free Report: Lenovo Flex System vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about Lenovo Flex System vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lenovo Flex System vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.