We performed a comparison between HPE All-Flash Storage and VAST Data based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hitachi Vantara and others in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays."It's just very easy for general block storage."
"The predictive performance analytics is a very good feature, as our system is performing better than before."
"Provides fast access and is user-friendly."
"Cost, racial per terabyte, and speed is why we chose PureStorage. It was no brainer."
"We can store more for a cheaper price as opposed to paying for larger devices and larger rack spaces which get outdated sooner and which we'd have to change every two years. It simplifies storage for us."
"Pure is simple to set up and manage on a day-to-day basis."
"Simplicity and reliability are the most valuable feature of Pure Storage FlashArray."
"It upgrades in place which means we'll be using it well into the future."
"The initial setup is easy compared to other vendors."
"The solution is easily manageable."
"The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to process huge amounts of data."
"The solution is useful for machine learning and scientific applications, including computer simulations."
"This has been one of the most reliable storage systems that I have ever used."
"There are many features which need to be added, particularly on the replication side."
"It was not proactive communication."
"It's too early to tell if we've seen a reduction in total cost of ownership. The solution is expensive."
"I feel like there is too much automation; the user doesn't have any manual input."
"The price of the solution can improve."
"We haven't seen ROI yet."
"I want to learn more about command line usage which I have not explored much yet. However, there are many automated solutions for repetitive tasks. I would like to see additional features like performance monitoring, configuring of alerts, and the customization of alert thresholds in the next release."
"We do have an issue with the vCenter integration. Pure Storage says it has a lot of free space, but vCenter says its completely full. This is because their dedupes are saved as space, but Vcenter still detects the disk as completely full. So, we do have an issue with that."
"The product’s ability to recover information and generate reports needs enhancement."
"The support, visibility, and reporting features must be improved."
"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."
"The write performance could be improved because it is less than half of the read performance."
"The read/write ratio is an area in the solution with some flaws and needs improvement."
HPE All-Flash Storage is ranked 10th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays with 3 reviews while VAST Data is ranked 8th in NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays with 2 reviews. HPE All-Flash Storage is rated 9.0, while VAST Data is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of HPE All-Flash Storage writes "Easily manageable, expandable, and provides high-capacity and high security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VAST Data writes "Stability-wise, a device that has been up and running for years". HPE All-Flash Storage is most compared with , whereas VAST Data is most compared with Pure Storage FlashBlade, NetApp AFF, Qumulo, Dell PowerScale (Isilon) and DDN SFA7990X.
See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.
We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.