HP Wolf Security vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure comparison

HP and Sangfor are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. HP is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sangfor is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.7. HP holds a 2.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Sangfor’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sangfor users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

13,108 Views
3,801 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Read 11 Sangfor Endpoint Secure reviews

1,638 Views
1,622 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Sangfor Endpoint Secure are competitive endpoint security solutions with unique strengths. HP Wolf Security seems to have the upper hand in ease of use and management, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure excels in advanced malware detection and integration capabilities.

Features: HP Wolf Security is known for effective threat isolation, an easy-to-navigate management console, and straightforward deployment. Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers robust threat intelligence, AI-driven analytics, and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security could improve by having faster response times in threat detection, more frequent updates, and enhanced threat intelligence. Sangfor Endpoint Secure may benefit from improved customer support response time, simplified advanced features, and a more intuitive interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is praised for its straightforward deployment and helpful customer support. Sangfor Endpoint Secure has a more complex deployment process but provides commendations for its detailed documentation and strong customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security offers competitive pricing and solid return on investment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Sangfor Endpoint Secure, while slightly more expensive, provides strong value through enhanced security features. Users feel the higher cost is justified by the superior feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (14th)

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HP Wolf Security	2.5%
Sangfor Endpoint Secure	0.7%
Other	96.8%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Ovais Abbas

Coordinator Associate at National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases

Quick threat response and behavior analysis while enhancing network security

The main use case is usually related to security. It deals with attacks that come day-to-day such as zero-day attacks and APT attacks. Our main task is to secure the network infrastructure in the hospital where I work It facilitates the departments of IT and other departments to procure and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The real-time monitoring feature of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is truly real-time, with no delay compared to other solutions."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"We use the product for network protection from any malicious threat."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

Cons

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"Sometimes, the VPN is not secure and doesn't work properly in Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure should include healing capabilities."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

At first, people might not understand the interface, which is why it should be simplified. However, once they understand it and see its functionality firsthand, everyone would recommend Sangfor.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 13% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 11% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 18% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 11% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 9% of the time

Open EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 8% of the time

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 6% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

January 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

January 2026

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

Sample Customers

Valspar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure

December 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.