No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hexagon EAM vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hexagon EAM
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of Hexagon EAM is 3.0%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hexagon EAM3.0%
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management3.0%
Other94.0%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

TalalAhmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Functional Consultant at Synergy Computers
Integrated asset and work order management has reduced errors and simplifies hospital operations
I find every feature of Hexagon EAM to be the best for me because it decreases time and minimizes paper usage, including the energy management system that integrates with other flow meters allowing all data to be viewed on a single screen. This feature was introduced in 2023 and is known as Equipment Overview 360, which is particularly valuable since few applications offer such a feature in EAM. My clients utilize energy meters, some manual and some digital, in conjunction with Equipment Overview 360, which helps them gather data more efficiently, monitor it every second or every five seconds, and view their historical data over the last three to four years, making data management significantly easier. I consider features such as Equipment Overview 360, energy management, work order management, permit to work system, and especially the case management system introduced in 2017 for one client to be very valuable. We adapted Hexagon EAM for health and safety, incorporating case management capabilities with root cause analysis and fishbone diagrams. Hexagon EAM is not only about work order management; it also includes asset management, as seen in the hospital sector where we manage around 35,000 active assets and 250 plus labs using Hexagon EAM for asset management, work order management, and store management in one of my clients.
RajneeshThamke - PeerSpot reviewer
program director at Birlasoft IndiaLtd.
Has supported tracking asset lifecycles with cost and maintenance visibility
The best feature is the ability to track the entire lifecycle from when the asset enters your organization until disposal. The entire lifecycle can be captured, including costs, depreciation, and any maintenance performed on the asset. All these costs can be tracked, which is the beauty of it. The advanced analytics and reporting tools are highly advanced. Because of the advent of AI technology, integrating it with AI will probably add much more value to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I appreciate the most about Hexagon EAM are its robust features."
"I find every feature of Hexagon EAM to be the best for me because it decreases time and minimizes paper usage, including the energy management system that integrates with other flow meters allowing all data to be viewed on a single screen."
"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted our organization; it was our first project, and after go-live, it resulted in huge success, with the client satisfied and thrilled, cost reductions around 30%, labor utilization increased by 20%, and new users adopting the systems, appreciating the product, and eager to work in those systems."
"My advice to others who are considering implementing Hexagon EAM is to implement it, that it is a good product, that it is a product totally adaptable to each of the clients' needs, that it has a lot of potential to grow if they finally want to get the most out of it."
"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted our organization by significantly lowering costs."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"This is a very good and flexible solution, and it works across any kind of asset-intensive industries or organizations and would be very helpful for them in general."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
 

Cons

"Adding more columns to existing objects is very hard, and I need to create custom tables and link them to the existing tables, which makes coding very challenging."
"One thing I believe could be improved in Hexagon EAM is the scheduling function, as it can seem daunting at first to those who are not comfortable on a computer, compared to our previous asset management system, which had a better and easier-to-use scheduling module."
"The stability of Hexagon EAM has been good, although it can be a bit slow when handling a lot of data."
"I think Hexagon EAM can be improved, particularly regarding the application slowing down or certain modules being unavailable at times."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is not expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Government
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hexagon EAM?
Hexagon EAM can be improved, especially in workflows. If I observe other applications, I can customize the workflow as part of not only the out-of-box features, allowing for proper customization of...
What is your primary use case for Hexagon EAM?
My main use case for Hexagon EAM is that I was a developer at Hexagon, and I perform customizations as part of client requirements. A specific example of a customization I have worked on using Hexa...
What advice do you have for others considering Hexagon EAM?
The advice I would give to others looking into using Hexagon EAM is to be careful while writing Flexes. Since Flexes are based on PL/SQL, if I mess up with any PL/SQL, I cannot save any records, so...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is very user-friendly to set up. It gives a lot of flexibility to make changes according to business needs.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
This solution is primarily designed for mid-tier companies. While SAP is the most expensive option, those who cannot afford SAP normally opt for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management....
What is your primary use case for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
Any customer who has an asset-intensive business where lots of assets are involved needs a system. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management helps these businesses manage their assets eff...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Find out what your peers are saying about Hexagon EAM vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.