No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hexagon EAM vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hexagon EAM
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of Hexagon EAM is 3.0%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is 2.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hexagon EAM3.0%
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management2.7%
Other94.3%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

SA
Senior product manager at Metrolinx
Digital workflows have transformed fleet maintenance and now need faster UI and smarter automation
Hexagon EAM can be improved by incorporating artificial intelligence features, predictive maintenance features, and inventory management improvements. They can also explore adding more features beneficial for daily operations. Hexagon EAM could also extend into different sectors like oil and engineering fields, which they are already doing. The EAM application will help save money through predictive maintenance activities, leading to higher efficiency of the equipment. I want to highlight that whenever we have hundreds of checklist items on a specific route, which has hundreds of equipment, processing these work orders takes a lot of time. The status changes are time-consuming because these work orders have hundreds of equipment attached to them and numerous checklist items. When we save the work order, it takes a long time. If Hexagon can improve the speed of the application, whether in the on-premise or cloud versions, by optimizing the user interface response times, it would be very helpful for us. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would give Hexagon EAM a 7. I chose 7 out of 10 because there are still many improvements needed on the EAM application regarding performance and the addition of predictive maintenance and artificial intelligence features. There is significant scope for improvement in application performance, which justifies my score of 7 out of 10.
RajneeshThamke - PeerSpot reviewer
program director at Birlasoft IndiaLtd.
Has supported tracking asset lifecycles with cost and maintenance visibility
The best feature is the ability to track the entire lifecycle from when the asset enters your organization until disposal. The entire lifecycle can be captured, including costs, depreciation, and any maintenance performed on the asset. All these costs can be tracked, which is the beauty of it. The advanced analytics and reporting tools are highly advanced. Because of the advent of AI technology, integrating it with AI will probably add much more value to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted our organization by significantly lowering costs."
"What I appreciate the most about Hexagon EAM are its robust features."
"Hexagon EAM helps the business maintain the buses by daily reading their mileage and managing asset life cycle maintenance."
"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted my organization by reducing the downtime of the assets."
"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted my organization by helping and solving problems in the work order workflow and approval in real-time."
"I find every feature of Hexagon EAM to be the best for me because it decreases time and minimizes paper usage, including the energy management system that integrates with other flow meters allowing all data to be viewed on a single screen."
"My advice to others who are considering implementing Hexagon EAM is to implement it, that it is a good product, that it is a product totally adaptable to each of the clients' needs, that it has a lot of potential to grow if they finally want to get the most out of it."
"By saving time for technicians, we complete work that typically takes 8 hours in just 4 hours, resulting in saving 50% of time and reducing labor costs as a result."
"This is a very good and flexible solution, and it works across any kind of asset-intensive industries or organizations and would be very helpful for them in general."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
 

Cons

"I think Hexagon EAM can be improved, particularly regarding the application slowing down or certain modules being unavailable at times."
"I want to highlight that whenever we have hundreds of checklist items on a specific route, which has hundreds of equipment, processing these work orders takes a lot of time."
"Hexagon EAM can be improved by rebranding from HxGN EAM to APM, Asset Performance Management."
"Adding more columns to existing objects is very hard, and I need to create custom tables and link them to the existing tables, which makes coding very challenging."
"Customers have noted that engaging with the Hexagon technical support team can be a lengthy process, especially with the on-premises version, where sharing logs and receiving resolutions is time-consuming."
"It excels at work management, with the majority of its functionalities focused there, but it lacks in the inventory module."
"I do wish there were more updates and enhancements."
"The stability of Hexagon EAM has been good, although it can be a bit slow when handling a lot of data."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is not expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hexagon EAM?
I would add that one of the features of Hexagon EAM that could be improved is the lack of vendor-side integration or a module for vendors. In most cases I have encountered where Hexagon EAM is used...
What is your primary use case for Hexagon EAM?
My main use cases for Hexagon EAM are asset maintenance and inventory management, which are primarily used in automotive manufacturing and the pharmaceuticals industry. I can provide a specific exa...
What advice do you have for others considering Hexagon EAM?
On the integration side, I have not used DataBridge Pro, but I believe it is a good step towards integration with other applications. Reporting through Cognos Report Studio is good and offers most ...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is very user-friendly to set up. It gives a lot of flexibility to make changes according to business needs.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
This solution is primarily designed for mid-tier companies. While SAP is the most expensive option, those who cannot afford SAP normally opt for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management....
What is your primary use case for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
Any customer who has an asset-intensive business where lots of assets are involved needs a system. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management helps these businesses manage their assets eff...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Find out what your peers are saying about Hexagon EAM vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.