No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Patch Management (28th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
160
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management and Trellix Endpoint Security Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Heimdal Patch and Asset Management is designed for Patch Management and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.6% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.5% mindshare, down 3.9% since last year.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Heimdal Patch and Asset Management0.6%
NinjaOne7.6%
Microsoft Configuration Manager7.4%
Other84.4%
Patch Management
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.5%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint7.2%
CrowdStrike Falcon6.3%
Other83.0%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Manager at PT Symcaw Solutions Indonesia
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.
PankajKumar24 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd
Advanced threat prevention has strengthened incident response and customized security workflows
The biggest advantage of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is the ATP solution, which provides advanced threat prevention. Machine learning algorithms are available in the product as part of the threat anti-malware, including predictive machine learning and behavioral analysis, which are integral to the anti-malware module of EPP. In terms of my experience with the machine learning algorithms for analysis and threat detection, we are analyzing logs provided by Trellix, but we are not able to conduct specific machine learning analysis on those logs. The automated response mechanisms in the products help with incident management because we have to create playbooks in Trellix console for automation, which we need to enable. The customizable dashboard of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform definitely contributes to the decision-making process, as we customize the dashboard according to customer requirements. When it comes to integration aspects, we are able to integrate Trellix Endpoint Security Platform with SIEM or SOAR solutions using the ePO console, which enhances threat detection capabilities. Reporting and analytics aspects have an impact on security posture assessment, as we are able to fetch reports in the ePO console customized according to customer requirements for downloading and sending via email.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
"The solution scales well."
"The detection capability of Trellix Endpoint Security is higher than traditional antivirus solutions."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"The solution is stable."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."
"Some of McAfee Endpoint Security's main features are it has benefits over normal conventional antivirus solutions because it works much faster."
"The solution provides dashboard control, so we can centrally monitor the entire status of our organization."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"I would like to see more integration with third-party products."
"The solution needs to improve its virtual patching capabilities. One area where it could improve is by offering a patch management solution bundled with its security products. This would make it even more competitive against solutions like Kaspersky that offer this feature."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"Pricing is fair."
"Since the maintenance is done by our own team, the price of the subscription should really be cheaper."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"We pay 650 Rand for a license. It is a perpetual license which we normally run for two years."
"The product is expensive."
"Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
890,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Agriculture
10%
University
8%
Transportation Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise37
Large Enterprise62
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.
 

Also Known As

Thor Foresight Enterprise
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: March 2026.
890,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.