No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Patch Management (39th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
167
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (8th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management and Trellix Endpoint Security Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Heimdal Patch and Asset Management is designed for Patch Management and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.3% mindshare, down 3.9% since last year.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Heimdal Patch and Asset Management0.8%
NinjaOne6.8%
Microsoft Configuration Manager6.3%
Other86.1%
Patch Management
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.3%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint6.5%
CrowdStrike Falcon5.7%
Other84.5%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Manager at PT Symcaw Solutions Indonesia
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.
AmitKumar22 - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Manager at Frontier Business systems
Strong endpoint protection has simplified compliance and reduced effort for large user environments
One of the best features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is its endpoint security, and I have been using it for the last four and a half to five years, so I can say this is one of the best EDR endpoint security solutions I have ever seen. The features that make Trellix Endpoint Security Platform stand out for me are ease of use and analytics, which I really appreciate the most. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform positively impacts my organization, ensuring we are compliant with SOC 2, HIPAA, and all other compliance requirements, so there are no issues with that.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
"The support that we get from McAfee is excellent."
"The platform's most valuable features are AI capabilities and its quick updates."
"The initial setup is straightforward, not complex."
"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."
"The remote installation capabilities are very helpful for us."
"HIPS protects server files from being modified or deleted by unauthorized users. It's primarily deployed in the web tier."
"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."
"The package of protection that it provides is useful. It has antivirus, malware protection, VPN, and a whole bunch of other features."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"They could provide better integration capabilities for the product with other services."
"We’re facing remote installation issues sometimes:"
"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive."
"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."
"I would like to see more automation."
"They could improve it by providing better manageability for administrators. I need to spend too much time on this right now."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."
"It is reasonably priced."
"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."
"The product is expensive."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"Annual license fee is good"
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Agriculture
10%
Transportation Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business68
Midsize Enterprise39
Large Enterprise67
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.
 

Also Known As

Thor Foresight Enterprise
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: August 2026.
912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.