No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
39th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...
Ranking in Patch Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (4th), Vulnerability Management (20th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (4th), Mobile Threat Defense (4th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (17th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Manager at PT Symcaw Solutions Indonesia
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.
reviewer2882148 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally
In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
"By moving to Intune, they were able to save the complete cost for Ivanti Neurons for UEM and put it towards something they were already paying for, and additionally they improved enrollment deployment time significantly and now can deploy laptops in an hour and even give the task to end users."
"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."
"From the reporting we receive, we perform patching updates every week with no tickets or complaints from users saying they dislike it or their computers were abruptly restarted."
"The advice I would give to others looking into using Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is that it is a vast and very trustworthy application with vast features that you can use for entire endpoint management along with patching and app controls."
"Ivanti Neurons for UEM has positively impacted my organization by providing customers with tools to scan, perform remote desktop functions, conduct patch analysis, and manage software deployment along with network scanning."
"MobileIron UEM is a scalable solution."
"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to reduce the volume of daily tasks."
"I experience every day how the unified platform has really optimized IT and security operations processes since patch management automatically patches the vulnerabilities."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."
"To improve Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, I believe we should focus on automating recurring problems, improving detection, and measuring results."
"I would like to have better support for the application."
"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."
"Customer support is really poor."
"In terms of improvements for Ivanti Neurons for UEM, the only challenge I face with EPM Endpoint Manager is in scanning network devices, as some devices appear without a serial number, which is an issue that takes more time since customers often require the serial number as a mandatory field."
"Sometimes I find that the reporting in Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is too detailed, and I would appreciate the ability to customize my reporting a little bit more."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."
"The solution is affordable."
"The solution is expensive compared to other products."
"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."
"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Agriculture
10%
Transportation Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise30
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it is quite high.
What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management can be improved by allowing me to drive optimization, proactive monitoring, and automatic information, which lets Ivanti detect and resolve endpoint issues fas...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
My main use case for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is support. I use Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management in my daily work to review tickets and look at issues and access requests. I have ...
 

Also Known As

Thor Foresight Enterprise
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
Frontier Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: September 2026.
913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.