Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Patch Management (23rd)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (9th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management and Trellix Endpoint Security Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Heimdal Patch and Asset Management is designed for Patch Management and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.9% mindshare, down 4.3% since last year.
Patch Management
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."
"The most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security include its protection capabilities such as DNS and endpoint security, DNS threat prevention, as well as advanced threat prevention."
"We like the management of the ePO, and we like the management console."
"Technical support is always available and very helpful."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"I recommend Trellix Endpoint Security to others as it seems like one of the industry standards and is fairly stable."
"Tech support is responsive. They're good, the very best."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
"They can make it free, but that's not going to happen."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
"The VirusScan needs to improve in order to detect ransomware and other advanced threats."
"The interface is complex."
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
"The pricing is great and licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."
"We pay 650 Rand for a license. It is a perpetual license which we normally run for two years."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"Pricing is fair."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
"It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market."
"Since the maintenance is done by our own team, the price of the subscription should really be cheaper."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
863,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Agriculture
8%
Performing Arts
7%
Government
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
 

Also Known As

Thor Foresight Enterprise
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , Qualys and others in Patch Management. Updated: July 2025.
863,651 professionals have used our research since 2012.