No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Patch Management (39th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
167
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (8th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Heimdal Patch and Asset Management and Trellix Endpoint Security Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Heimdal Patch and Asset Management is designed for Patch Management and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.3% mindshare, down 3.9% since last year.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Heimdal Patch and Asset Management0.8%
NinjaOne6.8%
Microsoft Configuration Manager6.3%
Other86.1%
Patch Management
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.3%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint6.5%
CrowdStrike Falcon5.7%
Other84.5%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Manager at PT Symcaw Solutions Indonesia
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.
AmitKumar22 - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Manager at Frontier Business systems
Strong endpoint protection has simplified compliance and reduced effort for large user environments
One of the best features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is its endpoint security, and I have been using it for the last four and a half to five years, so I can say this is one of the best EDR endpoint security solutions I have ever seen. The features that make Trellix Endpoint Security Platform stand out for me are ease of use and analytics, which I really appreciate the most. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform positively impacts my organization, ensuring we are compliant with SOC 2, HIPAA, and all other compliance requirements, so there are no issues with that.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
"For those who can't afford expensive cybersecurity professionals but are responsible for configuring the security of the organization, MVISION Endpoint is a good product to go with."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"The most valuable features are reporting from the ePO console and the advanced threat protection (ATP)."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"Their malware detection rate is excellent for all type of devices and the anti-theft products are good and easy to use."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is very stable."
"HIPS protects server files from being modified or deleted by unauthorized users. It's primarily deployed in the web tier."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
"What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature. There should be daily signature updates for protection."
"The vendor should simplify the way they bundle the products because it's very hard to explain to customers what products contain which features."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"Currently, Trellix Endpoint Security can't find the running mutexes, while other open-source products can do it."
"We have reports by users of machines being slow when the on-demand scan starts."
"They could improve it by providing better manageability for administrators. I need to spend too much time on this right now."
"An area in need of improvement involves the overview, which usually does not enable one to get the value in reports."
"The solution currently lacks mobile device management."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
"We pay for the license on an annual basis."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."
"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."
"It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine."
"I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Agriculture
10%
Transportation Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business68
Midsize Enterprise39
Large Enterprise67
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.
 

Also Known As

Thor Foresight Enterprise
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: August 2026.
912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.