We performed a comparison between HCL Verse and Superhuman based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the mail server."
"HCL Verse has a nice interface and it is a practical email solution. There are a diverse set of features, such as the search bar on top of the screens."
"It is fast, and it increases your productivity."
"The best feature about Superhuman is the fact that you don't have to manually go through your emails. This solution segregates your email according to your preferences and how you want to categorize emails."
"The solution could improve by allowing us to use a color that we want in the editing boxes."
"Security is very important to us, so improvements to this functionality are welcome."
"Superhuman could be improved by being made available across a broader range of devices including Android and Windows PCs."
"It can have a few more integrations. As far as I know, it is being integrated with Salesforce."
Earn 20 points
HCL Verse is ranked 14th in Email Applications while Superhuman is ranked 11th in Email Applications with 2 reviews. HCL Verse is rated 9.0, while Superhuman is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HCL Verse writes "Stable, scalable, and good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Superhuman writes "Email triage solution that actions and handles emails based on preferences". HCL Verse is most compared with HCL Notes, HCL Domino, Office 365, Huddle and Hub, whereas Superhuman is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, ProtonMail and Google Workspace. See our HCL Verse vs. Superhuman report.
See our list of best Email Applications vendors.
We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
