No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gretel.ai vs Serverless comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gretel.ai
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AI Synthetic Data (6th)
Serverless
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Gretel.ai and Serverless aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Gretel.ai is designed for AI Synthetic Data and holds a mindshare of 8.9%, up 8.6% compared to last year.
Serverless, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Architecture Management, holds 0.3% mindshare.
AI Synthetic Data Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Gretel.ai8.9%
Tonic.ai15.1%
Broadcom Test Data Manager8.8%
Other67.2%
AI Synthetic Data
Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Serverless0.3%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect8.9%
LeanIX7.7%
Other83.1%
Enterprise Architecture Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Gretel.ai?
Leave a review
SA
Lead Software Engineer
Serverless workflows have boosted rapid AWS development but still need better CI and automation
Serverless has many advantages, and it is very easy to handle with a cloud solution. However, there are a few concerns about the limitations. Especially when I work with Lambdas, there are maximum Lambda timeouts. Likewise, there are several things from Serverless, such as maximum file uploads. Serverless can be improved by addressing the challenges faced when we have the first infrastructure. Sometimes it is hard because we need to manually create things such as Cognito pools. While 90 percent of the time is automated, more automation would be better. If Serverless provided CI/CD capabilities, that would also be great, as currently it only allows for manual deployments. Additionally, when working with cloud services, Serverless allows the use of LocalStack or Serverless Dev, but I think Serverless Dev might need simplification for easy access without organization registration. When considering needed improvements, I get frustrated with Lambda time and similar issues, which are actually not related to Serverless but rather are AWS issues. However, when discussing Serverless, the main points I see require improvement from the Serverless end.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Synthetic Data solutions are best for your needs.
896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
37%
Transportation Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Construction Company
32%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Serverless?
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience, I find the application to be very cost-effective. The headcount needed is much lower compared to supporting services in software development...
What needs improvement with Serverless?
Serverless has many advantages, and it is very easy to handle with a cloud solution. However, there are a few concerns about the limitations. Especially when I work with Lambdas, there are maximum ...
What is your primary use case for Serverless?
My main use case for Serverless is that I mainly worked on Node.js serverless applications for my platforms, and I have worked with different domains, spanning three or four domains with Serverless...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview