No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Glassbox vs OpenText Contact Center Analytics comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Glassbox
Ranking in Customer Data Analysis
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Web Analytics (4th)
OpenText Contact Center Ana...
Ranking in Customer Data Analysis
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Customer Data Analysis category, the mindshare of Glassbox is 9.7%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Contact Center Analytics is 2.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Data Analysis Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Glassbox9.7%
OpenText Contact Center Analytics2.4%
Other87.9%
Customer Data Analysis
 

Featured Reviews

James Dascole - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at Charter Communications
Customer journeys have become clearer and real-time insights now highlight needed reporting improvements
One improvement I want to mention is that the way I had Glassbox set up was through the data layer; I am a technical person, so I used a Google Dev screen to search within Glassbox for segments rather than using the Adobe API connection, which I think would have been preferable since others have reported better success with that. I give Glassbox a seven because I would have preferred it connected through Adobe rather than through the data layer, which complicates training for non-technical staff to build custom reports; having the Adobe API set up would have made finding Adobe segments easier.
Abbasi Poonawala - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Enterprise Architect at Alinma Bank
Analytics has reduced churn and improved IVR routing but now needs better data integration
Tighter integration with the CRM and IVR could enhance the overall integration capabilities, and there is room for improvement in the data ecosystem, including integration with multiple data platforms such as Snowflake.To make the experience smoother with OpenText Contact Center Analytics, the entire stack needs to support observability metrics. The addition of better observability metrics can yield better results, such as measuring churn reduction rates.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One specific outcome I can share about Glassbox is a decrease in customer complaints because as soon as I catch an issue, as soon as there is an event where a particular issue is occurring and it crosses the threshold, the system sends an event and I can check that user session to see what is happening and address that issue immediately and resolve it."
"Glassbox positively impacted our organization because we got a one-stop solution to track all different journeys, different dashboards, and different applications."
"Glassbox is a tool I use all the time; it is one of our most popular tools."
"The customer support is nice; we have a quite strict partnership with continuous feedback, workshops, and they are listening to us because the client is quite important, so it is fine."
"Glassbox has reduced the turnaround time of customer incidents, and it is saving a lot of time and money for us."
"One of the biggest benefits of using Glassbox is faster issue identification and better visibility into customer experience problems."
"Glassbox has helped us save considerable money and time."
"I have seen a return on investment, having saved a lot of money and time."
"The biggest advantage of OpenText Contact Center Analytics is its positive impact on customer churn and revenue, where revenues have increased drastically due to the adoption of the tool."
"The biggest advantage I see in OpenText Contact Center Analytics is its ease of use, as the tool provides usability, reusability, adaptability, and ease for new users; you do not need to build your skills to use it, which is valuable."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics helped us move from reactive support to data-driven operational improvements."
"I am totally satisfied with how they operate because it also manages our large documents; we have somewhere around six million documents, and there are almost two hundred plus people using OpenText Contact Center Analytics document management system and their dashboard features and everything, so two hundred plus of our team members are using it."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics has positively impacted my organization by helping save us considerable time to analyze data."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics has helped in reducing customer churn for one of our clients, which contributes to top-line growth for our clients."
 

Cons

"I give Glassbox a seven because I would have preferred it connected through Adobe rather than through the data layer, which complicates training for non-technical staff to build custom reports; having the Adobe API set up would have made finding Adobe segments easier."
"Glassbox is not the best when it comes to back-end data and capturing things such as server time and response time."
"Glassbox is powerful, but I think the user interface could be more intuitive for new users."
"One frustration I have experienced with Glassbox is that with large amounts of session data, it could sometimes take time to filter and narrow down the exact user journey I want to analyze."
"There are sometimes issues with Glassbox itself where some alerts do not get captured or the GIA integration does not show correct results, but it is being learned and improving."
"Glassbox can be improved because it is somewhat complex and there is a steep learning curve that requires training."
"Glassbox can be improved in various ways. I think performance and lag are areas needing improvements."
"Glassbox is not stable in my experience. Glassbox often has downtime and technical issues; reports are not loading and there are login errors."
"Tighter integration with the CRM and IVR could enhance the overall integration capabilities, and there is room for improvement in the data ecosystem, including integration with multiple data platforms such as Snowflake."
"We have nine engineers, but I don't think it requires that much because the engineers take up all of their bandwidth."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics can be improved by being more flexible and scalable on other public clouds with new features."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics could be improved in the integration with other SAP applications, particularly the integration mechanism with C4C systems, which is an area where we want OpenText Contact Center Analytics to provide an automated solution."
"On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the benefit of the speech and text analytics capabilities as a seven, as it sometimes worked but also sometimes did not, indicating room for improvement."
"While OpenText Contact Center Analytics is strong in conversation intelligence and enterprise-scale analytics, I can suggest a few improvements."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Data Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise9
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Glassbox?
Pricing was fair; while I did not directly manage the budget, we continually renewed at a great rate.
What needs improvement with Glassbox?
One improvement I want to mention is that the way I had Glassbox set up was through the data layer; I am a technical person, so I used a Google Dev screen to search within Glassbox for segments rat...
What is your primary use case for Glassbox?
My main use case for Glassbox is customer journey mapping. I use Glassbox for mapping the customer journey by looking between starting pages and end pages, finding where customers veer off, closing...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Contact Center Analytics?
I do not know if OpenText Contact Center Analytics is expensive or affordable, as I was not part of the procurement. I believe OpenText Contact Center Analytics should expand their licensing model ...
What needs improvement with OpenText Contact Center Analytics?
To improve OpenText Contact Center Analytics customer experience analytics, they need to enhance features, conduct cross-comparative analysis, improve UI/UX, and undertake stress testing for differ...
What is your primary use case for OpenText Contact Center Analytics?
My use cases with OpenText Contact Center Analytics were to build dashboards in Power BI, which required integration between Power BI and the dashboards coming out of this tool. I did not implement...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bank Leumi
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Glassbox vs. OpenText Contact Center Analytics and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.