No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Glassbox vs OpenText Contact Center Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Glassbox
Ranking in Customer Data Analysis
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Web Analytics (7th)
OpenText Contact Center Ana...
Ranking in Customer Data Analysis
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Customer Data Analysis category, the mindshare of Glassbox is 8.1%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Contact Center Analytics is 1.7%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Data Analysis Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Glassbox8.1%
OpenText Contact Center Analytics1.7%
Other90.2%
Customer Data Analysis
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2816604 - PeerSpot reviewer
SRE at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Session insights have transformed how we detect user errors and prioritize fixes across regions
Glassbox now has GIA as an AI integration that provides analysis very quickly without needing to watch the entire session. Based on previous results, the analysis is accurate 90 to 95 percent of the time regarding possible reasons why a user faced an issue. Based on that analysis, we can make a report and get things done to prevent errors. The best features that Glassbox offers are reporting and the funnel. These two use cases help us most as we can determine the expected count for user behavior and compare it to earlier weeks and days from the same period. In the report section, we can identify specific alerts that are being triggered on a regular basis so we can capture and analyze them and fix them in the longer term. The funnel feature helps us check user impact and identify which countries or specific areas the website is failing in. With this feature, if a customer is facing a cart page error, we can check how many users were impacted at that specific time and which regions those users are experiencing errors. We can also check what products those customers are trying to add. Based on that information, we can create a report and check comparisons. When we share it with the business team, they can determine if the issue is widespread and work on it with higher priority, or if it has lower impact with fewer users affected, indicating an intermittent error that can be worked on with lower priority. Glassbox has had a positive impact on my organization through all the features it provides. As AI is advancing and its adaptability within the app itself integrates many use cases, the reports, funnels, dashboards, GIA features, and integrations that Glassbox provides help us address issue behavior and work on resolutions. Additionally, it creates reports that we can share with other teams so they can determine if the impact is wider. To prevent errors quickly, Glassbox captures reproducible customer errors. If an error is not reproducible, Glassbox does not capture it and can mark it as a false alert. This is how we prevent false alerts and capture only genuine alerts.
Abbasi Poonawala - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Enterprise Architect at Alinma Bank
Analytics has reduced churn and improved IVR routing but now needs better data integration
Tighter integration with the CRM and IVR could enhance the overall integration capabilities, and there is room for improvement in the data ecosystem, including integration with multiple data platforms such as Snowflake.To make the experience smoother with OpenText Contact Center Analytics, the entire stack needs to support observability metrics. The addition of better observability metrics can yield better results, such as measuring churn reduction rates.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Glassbox positively impacted our organization because we got a one-stop solution to track all different journeys, different dashboards, and different applications."
"Glassbox has helped us save considerable money and time."
"I have seen a return on investment, having saved a lot of money and time."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics has helped in reducing customer churn for one of our clients, which contributes to top-line growth for our clients."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics helped us move from reactive support to data-driven operational improvements."
"The biggest advantage of OpenText Contact Center Analytics is its positive impact on customer churn and revenue, where revenues have increased drastically due to the adoption of the tool."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics has positively impacted my organization by helping save us considerable time to analyze data."
 

Cons

"Glassbox can be improved because it is somewhat complex and there is a steep learning curve that requires training."
"Glassbox can be improved in various ways. I think performance and lag are areas needing improvements."
"There are sometimes issues with Glassbox itself where some alerts do not get captured or the GIA integration does not show correct results, but it is being learned and improving."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics can be improved by being more flexible and scalable on other public clouds with new features."
"OpenText Contact Center Analytics could be improved in the integration with other SAP applications, particularly the integration mechanism with C4C systems, which is an area where we want OpenText Contact Center Analytics to provide an automated solution."
"Tighter integration with the CRM and IVR could enhance the overall integration capabilities, and there is room for improvement in the data ecosystem, including integration with multiple data platforms such as Snowflake."
"While OpenText Contact Center Analytics is strong in conversation intelligence and enterprise-scale analytics, I can suggest a few improvements."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Data Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Glassbox?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is great, and it is cost-effective. The pricing is good, and licensing is also easy.
What needs improvement with Glassbox?
Glassbox can be improved in various ways. I think performance and lag are areas needing improvements. Basically, it is a platform speed issue. Users have reported performance lag, especially when r...
What is your primary use case for Glassbox?
My main use case for Glassbox is to utilize it for the product layouts and the checkout funnels. In our main use case, we have to use two homepages, such as get your money and we have some apply no...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Contact Center Analytics?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the sales team handled it, and I believe it is quite feasible.
What needs improvement with OpenText Contact Center Analytics?
Tighter integration with the CRM and IVR could enhance the overall integration capabilities, and there is room for improvement in the data ecosystem, including integration with multiple data platfo...
What is your primary use case for OpenText Contact Center Analytics?
OpenText Contact Center Analytics is primarily used for analytics on call recordings, integrated with our in-house IVR system.The integration with the IVR system focuses on menu options in the IVR ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bank Leumi
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Glassbox vs. OpenText Contact Center Analytics and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.